View clinical trials related to Infertility.
Filter by:The goal of this study is to determine if benchtop incubators improve the number of embryos making it to the blastocyst stage of development (about 4-6 days after fertilization) in people undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment for their infertility. - Test the effectiveness of the benchtop incubator. - Determine if the number of embryos reaching the blastocyst stage of embryo development (the stage that the embryos are biopsied for PGT-A and frozen) is improved in the benchtop incubator compared to the box incubator. - Compare embryology outcomes between the two incubator types. - Investigate transfer and pregnancy outcomes. - Expand the knowledge surrounding the impact of the incubator on IVF outcomes. Patients will have their mature oocytes collected at the egg retrieval procedure split into two groups and randomized to be cultured in both incubator types.
The aim of this randomized controlled trial was to compare the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of using progestin with GnRH antagonist to prevent premature LH surge in poor responders undergoing double stimulation protocol.
Study Aims: To evaluate the impact of oxidative and nitrosative stress, as well as DNA methylation, on male reproductive health. This is achieved by analyzing urinary biomarkers: 8-oxoGua, 8-oxoGuo, 8-oxodGuo, 3-nitrotyrosine (3-NO2Tyr), 5-methylcytidine (5-MeCyt), and cotinine in infertile and fertile males. Study Design: A prospective observational case-control study comparing infertile male patients (cases) from a reproductive sciences center with fertile male volunteers (controls) from a gynecology and obstetrics department. The study focuses on understanding the role of oxidative stress in male infertility and its implications for assisted reproductive techniques.
A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Pivotal Study of the May Health System in Transvaginal Ablation of Ovarian Tissue under Ultrasound Guidance in Women with Infertility due to Polycystic Ovary Syndrome
Oocyte quality is a basic parameter that affects embryo quality and therefore it influences the outcome of assisted reproduction. It has been suggested that oocyte quality is improved by the intake of vitamins and antioxidants. Ova-Max is a dietary supplement that consists of vitamins, minerals and antioxidants which improve women's oocytes by preventing oxidative stress. Specifically, Ovamax includes Chasteberry, Melatonin, Myo-Inositol, Folic Acid, Co-Enzyme Q10, Vitamin E, L-Arginine, Grape seed extract and Alpha-lipoic Acid. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the influence of Ova-max intake on oocyte quality in women undergoing In Vitro Fertilization. According to the research hypothesis the administration of Ova-Max for three months increases oocyte quality in women undergoing intracellular sperm injection after ovarian stimulation and oocyte retrieval.
The purpose of the study is to evaluate the influence of needle size, injected fluid volume, and rate of fluid on the degree of pain experienced by adult healthy volunteers after subcutaneous infusion of sterile saline.
This study will aim to assess the fertility status of men with Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA) not on disease-modifying therapies. Participants will: 1. Complete online questionnaires that will assess SMA diagnosis and disease burden, medical and surgical history, medication usage, and fertility status and perspectives. 2. Over the 3-month initial study baseline period participants will provide two separate ejaculates for semen analysis and a single determination of sperm quality using DNA fragmentation testing using home collection and subsequent shipment to a central laboratory. 3. Over the initial study baseline period of 3 months study participants will obtain a blood test to determine male reproductive hormone levels. During the 24-month study duration, participants will be requested to undergo a yearly semen analysis and complete online relevant questionnaires.
Prospective observational study on the quality of life of patients attending general urology, sexual medicine, reproductive medicine, functional urology, neuro-urology and uro-oncology clinics.The data relating to the clinical conditions (disease state, psychological and related to quality of life) of the patients belonging to the above-mentioned clinics will be collected in a specially designed database which will allow us to extract the data in a simple and safe way used for statistical analyses. in clinical research.
IVF patients frequently experience physical, emotional or physicological burden; this is particularly relevant in the case of oocyte donors, since young women undergo a procedure that is of no health benefit to them. One of the phases of the treatment that contributes most to this situation is ovarian stimulation; as it involves the administration of daily injections which, in addition to the discomfort of administration, causes anxiety to the patient about its correct administration and possible side effects and to physicians concerns about patient compliance. Advances in pharmacology and knowledge of ovarian pathophysiology have led to the development of new protocols that simplify and reduce drug administration, decrease the potential risk of misapplication and contribute to an improved patient experience. In this context, Corifollitropin α, a long-acting recombinant FSH (rFSH) molecule, provides with a single subcutaneous injection similar results as daily administration of rFSH during a week. On the other hand, conventional stimulation protocols used in ART resort to using a GnRH analogue (agonist or antagonist) to prevent early luteinization, which is defined as the presence of a progesterone value of > 1.5 ng/ml on the day of induced ovulation. Nevertheless, its use presents some disadvantages, such as it being sometimes complex to achieve desensitization or consistent hypothalamic block, risk of OHS when ovulation is triggered with HCG or its cost. Hence the interest in exploring new options to prevent a premature peak in LH. Nowadays, the oral administration of progestagens (progesterone-primed ovarian stimulation [PPOS]) during the follicular phase of ovarian stimulation (OS) has emerged as an attractive alternative to conventional protocols for preventing early luteinization. Moreover, PPOS produces a similar or even better, in some subgroups, response to OS (length of treatment, number of MII, cancelation rate, etc.), reproductive outcomes (pregnancy rate, live birth rate, etc) and safety (rate of ovarian hyperstimulation [OHSS] or congenital malformations). Thus, PPOS would seem to be an effective option for personalized protocols, particularly when fresh embryo transfer (FET) is not to be performed, a circumstance that is likely to rise in frequency given the progressive increase in women's age at childbearing; for example, in oocyte donation, or in fertility preservation (FP) and preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A). However, very little data are available regarding cycle outcome following Corifollitropin α and PPOS as pituitary suppressor. The present study, a prospective RCT, was designed to evaluate cycle characteristics (MII oocytes as the primary objective) and endocrinologic profiles of oocyte donors receiving Corifollitropin α and MPA as co-treatment compared with those receiving a daily dose of rFSH (follitropin β) as a control.
Infertility, defined as the inability to conceive after 12 months of regular unprotected intercourse, is estimated to affect 1 in 7 heterosexual couples. Semen analysis, carried out as per the detailed World Health Organisation (WHO) standards in an andrology laboratory, is the primary investigation for the male partner presenting to the fertility clinic and reports on multiple semen parameters. Hospital clinic attendance is required, which could be at a significant distance from the patient's home, to produce a sample at a given appointment time that is then analysed by the laboratory without delay, as the results are time sensitive. A formal report is produced after several weeks. This process was not sustainable during the Covid pandemic and these methods would be threatened by similar situations in the future. Despite semen analysis being an essential component of fertility work-up the WHO themselves state that the test does not distinguish between fertile and infertile men. In addition, it involves a significant cost to the national healthcare system. Therefore, a more efficient initial test of male fertility warrants consideration. Home semen analysis tests are a screening tool that provide a simplified, initial assessment. They are widely available to purchase in the UK, but are not currently issued to patients seen in NHS clinics. They have the potential to reduce time to diagnosis and reduce the cost to the healthcare provider. To investigate the clinical and cost effectiveness of using home semen analysis tests a randomised controlled trial (RCT) is needed comparing them to laboratory semen analysis (standard care). Before a fully-fledged national trial is planned in a UK setting, the investigators would like to undertake a feasibility study to answer, "Is it feasible to conduct a trial comparing home semen analysis tests with current standard practice for the initial assessment of men referred to the fertility clinic?"