Hepatocellular Carcinoma Clinical Trial
Official title:
DEB-TACE With Visualable Microspheres Versus PVA Microspheres for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: a Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled, Non-inferior Trial
This study will evaluate the safety and efficacy of DEB-TACE with visualable embolization microspheres versus PVA microspheres for hepatocellular carcinoma.
Status | Recruiting |
Enrollment | 188 |
Est. completion date | December 31, 2026 |
Est. primary completion date | December 31, 2025 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years to 80 Years |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - CNLC Ia-IIIa HCC patients who require transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and are not suitable for or refuse surgical resection, liver transplantation, or ablation Liver function classification of Child-Pugh A or B - ECOG PS score of 0-2 - With measurable lesions that had not been embolized (if there are more than 3 lesions, select the three largest lesions as target lesions, and the maximum diameter of target lesion is =10cm) - Agree to participate in this trial and voluntarily sign the informed consent form Exclusion Criteria: - Target lesions were embolized, or will require concomitant ablation or radiotherapy after TACE treatment(s) - With diffuse liver tumor or extrahepatic metastasis, expected survival <6 months With sepsis or multiple organ dysfunction - Severe liver dysfunction (Child-Pugh C) , or severerenal dysfunction (blood creatinine >2 mg/dL) - Significant reductions in white blood cells or platelets (white blood cells <3.0×10^9/L, platelets <50×10^9/L, hemoglobin<60g/L) that cannot be corrected (except splenomegaly or chemotherapy-induced bone marrow suppression) Uncorrectable coagulation dysfunction (PT prolonged by >3 seconds above the upper limit of normal) - With severe infection (>5 times the upper limit of normal white blood cells) The main portal vein was completely embolized by tumor thrombus without collateral blood supply - With risk of ectopic embolization (uncorrected arteriovenous fistula or portal venous fistula) in the target lesion supplying arteries - Angiography shows vascular anatomy obstruction or vasospasm that will affect the catheter placemenr embolic agent injection - Known allergy to iodine-containing contrast agents, polyvinyl alcohol materials or anthracycline t ochemotherapy drugs - Pregnant or lactating women - Patients who are participating in other trial(s) - Unsuitable for participation in this trial deemed by the researchers |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
China | Peking University First Hospital | Beijing | Beijing |
China | Zhongda Hospital,Southeast University | Nanjing | Jiangsu |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Zhongda Hospital |
China,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Disease control rate (DCR) for target lesions 1 month after the last TACE treatment | Target lesions were evaluated according to the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST) criteria. | 1 month after last TACE treatment | |
Secondary | Visualization score of embolic area | Evaluation will be performed, based on CBCT images after the first TACE treatment, or CT plain images after the last TACE treatment as follow: 3 points: dense imaging (imaging area >75% of tumor area); 2 points: mixed imaging (imaging area 25%-75% of tumor area); 1 point: weak imaging (imaging area <25% of tumor area); 0 point: not visible (no imaging in the tumor area). | Immediately, 1 day, 1 month after first TACE treatment, and 1 month, 3 months, or 6 months since the last TACE treatment | |
Secondary | Embolization success rate of target lesions | Defined as the number of successful embolizations for the target lesions / the total number of participants ×100%. | Immediately after each TACE treatment | |
Secondary | Equipment performance evaluation | Includes,the visualization performance of the microspheres on the fluoroscopy or cone-beam CT imaging; whether the microspheres can be easy pushed and pass through the catheter smoothly; whether the micro-catheter will be blocked during the process of pushing and releasing? | From the begin to immediately after each TACE treatment | |
Secondary | Disease control rate (DCR) for target lesions | Target lesions will be evaluated according to the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST), based on the enhanced CT/MRI (liver) images. | 1 month after the first TACE treatment, and 3 months after the last TACE treatment | |
Secondary | Objective response rate(ORR) | Target lesions will be evaluated according to the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST), based on the enhanced CT/MRI (liver) images. | 1 month after the first TACE treatment and 1 month, 3 months since the last TACE treatment | |
Secondary | Number of TACE treatments for target lesions | Totel times of TACE treatments for all target lesions | 6 month since the last TACE treatment |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT04209491 -
Interest of the Intervention of a Nurse Coordinator in Complex Care Pathway
|
||
Completed |
NCT03963206 -
Cabozantinib toLERANCE Study in HepatoCellular Carcinoma (CLERANCE)
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT03268499 -
TACE Emulsion Versus Suspension
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05263830 -
Glypican-3 as a Prognostic Factor in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated by Immunotherapy
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT05044676 -
Immune Cells as a New Biomarker of Response in Patients Treated by Immunotherapy for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT05095519 -
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Imaging Using PSMA PET/CT
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05497531 -
Pilot Comparing ctDNA IDV vs. SPV Sample in Pts Undergoing Biopsies for Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Cancers
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05068193 -
A Clinical Trial to Compare the Pharmacokinetics and Bioequivalence of "BR2008" With "BR2008-1" in Healthy Volunteers
|
Phase 1 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT03781934 -
A Study to Evaluate MIV-818 in Patients With Liver Cancer Manifestations
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Terminated |
NCT03655613 -
APL-501 or Nivolumab in Combination With APL-101 in Locally Advanced or Metastatic HCC and RCC
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT03170960 -
Study of Cabozantinib in Combination With Atezolizumab to Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04242199 -
Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of INCB099280 in Participants With Advanced Solid Tumors
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT04401800 -
Preliminary Antitumor Activity, Safety and Tolerability of Tislelizumab in Combination With Lenvatinib for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
|
Phase 2 | |
Withdrawn |
NCT05418387 -
A Social Support Intervention to Improve Treatment Among Hispanic Kidney and Liver Cancer Patients in Arizona
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04039607 -
A Study of Nivolumab in Combination With Ipilimumab in Participants With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma
|
Phase 3 | |
Terminated |
NCT03970616 -
A Study of Tivozanib in Combination With Durvalumab in Subjects With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04118114 -
Phase II Study of PRL3-ZUMAB in Advanced Solid Tumors
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT03642561 -
Evaluation the Treatment Outcome for RFA in Patients With BCLC Stage B HCC in Comparison With TACE
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT06239155 -
A Phase I/II Study of AST-3424 in Subjects With Advanced Solid Tumors
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT03222076 -
Nivolumab With or Without Ipilimumab in Treating Patients With Resectable Liver Cancer
|
Phase 2 |