Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT02773420
Other study ID # 2015-0701
Secondary ID ISR-2015-10644
Status Completed
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date August 2015
Est. completion date January 2019

Study information

Verified date May 2021
Source University of Illinois at Chicago
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Purpose: The current study aims to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the HETâ„¢ Bipolar System (Medtronic, Boulder, CO) for the treatment of grade I-II hemorrhoids in a prospective pilot study. This device was evaluated retrospectively in a limited cohort of 23 patients previously. Methods: Patients seen at a colorectal clinic in a single institution with grade I-II hemorrhoids are offered to participate in a prospective pilot trial. The HET device is a modified anoscope equipped with LED lighting, a tissue clamping mechanism and a bipolar energy source used to treat multiple hemorrhoidal columns in one sitting. Three columns of hemorrhoids are treated with 2 heat energy applications per column. The primary outcome is the treatment effect on hemorrhoid symptoms of bleeding, pain, prolapse, itching, and soiling. This is measured with a patient completed questionnaire documenting each symptom's frequency from 0 to 3 (i.e. 0 is < 1x/month; 3 is daily) before therapy and at 3 weeks and 6 month follow-up. Post-treatment pain scores were recorded using the visual analog scale (VAS).


Description:

HET Bipolar System: Validation of Outpatient Hemorrhoid Treatment Introduction: This study will evaluate the effectiveness of treatment of Grade I-II hemorrhoids with the novel HET Bipolar System (Medtronic, Boulder, Co.). This device is a modified anoscope equipped with LED lighting, tissue clamping mechanism and bipolar energy device. It is inserted in the anus under direct vision targeting the tissue proximal to the hemorrhoid, which is placed within the treatment window and clamped. The bipolar energy device is activated to ligate the feeding hemorrhoidal vessels, essentially disrupting the blood supply to the hemorrhoid. The only published evaluation of this device to date is a retrospective analysis of the safety and efficacy of the device in 23 patients (1). There is no prospective study of this device and its effectiveness in the literature. The investigators aim to evaluate the efficacy of this device, defined as decrease in symptoms and/or recurrence, of Grade I-II hemorrhoids through a prospective study consisting of 30 patients. Other non invasive means of treating hemorrhoids range from sclerotherapy to rubber band ligation, which often requires multiple treatments and can cause some discomfort. The investigators aim to study HET Bipolar treatment of hemorrhoids to offer another validated minimally invasive option for the treatment of symptomatic hemorrhoids in the outpatient setting. Research Design and Method: The investigators will enroll a total of 30 subjects. Participating patients,18 years of age and older, will be undergoing treatment with the HET bipolar system for symptomatic Grade I and II hemorrhoids. Please note that the HET bipolar system is used as part of standard of care and participants will receive the treatment regardless of this research. The subjects will be identified and recruited by University of Illinois at Chicago Department of Colorectal Surgery faculty via clinic appointments in the Outpatient Care Center, 1801 W. Taylor St, Suite 3F, Chicago, Il 60612. Informed consent will be provided at the clinic in regards to participation in the study. Refusal to participate will not influence treatment options presented or deemed necessary for the subject's condition. A pretreatment hemorrhoid symptom questionnaire will be completed by each patient. In developing our questionnaire the investigators examined the only validated hemorrhoidal symptom questionnaire in the literature, the Sodergren Score (2) and also various others (3). The Sodergren score offers a theoretical basis, however the investigators chose to develop a questionnaire secondary to the need for inclusion of bleeding symptoms of hemorrhoids. While subjects are undergoing treatment, the investigators will record timing of treatment, number of hemorrhoids treated, and energy application timing. Immediately after the treatment, the patients will describe how painful the procedure was using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The questionnaire will take 5-10 minutes to complete. Patients will be seen for follow up outpatient clinic visits at 2-3 weeks and at 8-12 weeks post procedure. At follow up, the patients will be given a post-treatment questionnaire regarding symptoms of hemorrhoids (this is the same questionnaire as the pre-treatment questionnaire). The questionnaire assigns each of the five cardinal symptoms of hemorrhoids with a number from 0 to 3 with 3 being the most severe symptom. After tallying the five symptom scores, a total from 0 (no symptoms) to 15 (severe symptoms) will be assigned to each patient's overall symptoms. In addition, patients will be given a journal to record their daily pain for 14 consecutive days, day 21 and day 56 using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). This is to more accurately record pain, as the questionnaire does not include a VAS score component. Patients who are unable to come for follow up visits will be interviewed over the phone by one of the investigators and the relevant data, i.e. the questionnaire and pain score, will be obtained during this phone conversation. For patients following up over the phone, a phone script will be created in addition to the questionnaire. The total number of visits/encounters is 3 and will take place during regular clinic visit appointments. The difference between pre treatment and post treatment scores will be representative of the treatment effect. Statistical Section: Descriptive statistics will be used to describing the distribution of data. The Wilcoxon signed rank test will be used to examine the pre- and post- treatment symptom score difference. Paired two-sample t-test and McNemar's test will also be used to examine the pre- and post-treatment difference for other variables of interests. Sample size justification: Since the Wilcoxon signed rank test will be used to test the significant difference between pre- and post- treatment scores, the power calculation is based on the Wilcoxon signed rank test. At 80% power level, assuming correlation 0.2 between pre- and post- treatment scores, the sample size of 18 ensure minimum detectable difference in symptom score between pre- and post-treatment scores of 3. Thus, our sample size of 30 is appropriate. Example: At 80% power level, assuming correlation 0.2 between pre- and post- treatment scores, the sample size of 18 ensure minimum detectable difference in symptom score between pre- and post-treatment scores of 3. Expected Results/Conclusions: The investigators anticipate a significant decrease of hemorrhoidal symptoms, defined in this study as pain, pruritis, prolapse, soiling, and bleeding with the HET bipolar system, providing a validated outpatient minimally invasive treatment option for symptomatic hemorrhoids. Benefits/Risks: There is no direct benefit to the subjects of this study. The main risk of this research is loss of confidentiality of information. The patient may experience mild anxiety or discomfort in providing information about their health and well-being. Records will be stored in an electronic data file on a password protected computer in a locked office. Master key will be kept in a separate file accessible only by the primary investigator. Informed Consent: Informed consent will be provided at the clinic in regards to participation in the study. Refusal to participate will not influence treatment options presented or deemed necessary for the subject's condition. Consent will be obtained by the primary investigator and/or research fellows who have experience and training in the explanation of the procedure, potential risks and benefits. The informed consent document will be stored in the subject's electronic medical record. If non-English speaking subjects are encountered, the informed consent will be translated by interpretation in the language of the subject. Data and Safety Monitoring Plan: This study poses minimal risk, the main risk being mild anxiety or loss of confidentiality of information. If problems arise they will be handled according to Institutional Review Board protocol. Data Collection and Management Procedures: Data procurement will be done electronically and incorporated in password protected encrypted server in a locked office. The master key will be kept in a separate file accessible only by the primary investigator. Reporting Unanticipated Problems: If any unanticipated problems arise they will be reported to University of Illinois at Chicago's Insitutional Review Board per defined protocol.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 35
Est. completion date January 2019
Est. primary completion date January 2019
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: 1. 18 years of age and older. 2. Patients undergoing treatment for symptomatic hemorrhoids using the HET device Exclusion Criteria: 1. All patients not included in Inclusion Criteria 2. Patients with inflammatory bowel disease, malignancy, anal fissures and those who are subject to anti-coagulation therapy with any drug other than aspirin.

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Procedure:
HET Application
The HET device is a modified anoscope equipped with LED lighting, a tissue clamping mechanism and a bipolar energy source used to treat multiple hemorrhoidal columns in one sitting. Three columns of hemorrhoids were treated with 2 heat energy applications per column

Locations

Country Name City State
United States University of Illinois at Chicago Chicago Illinois

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
University of Illinois at Chicago Medtronic

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

References & Publications (3)

Gerjy R, Lindhoff-Larson A, Sjödahl R, Nyström PO. Randomized clinical trial of stapled haemorrhoidopexy performed under local perianal block versus general anaesthesia. Br J Surg. 2008 Nov;95(11):1344-51. doi: 10.1002/bjs.6379. — View Citation

Kantsevoy SV, Bitner M. Nonsurgical treatment of actively bleeding internal hemorrhoids with a novel endoscopic device (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 Oct;78(4):649-53. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.05.014. Epub 2013 Jul 25. — View Citation

Pucher PH, Qurashi M, Howell AM, Faiz O, Ziprin P, Darzi A, Sodergren MH. Development and validation of a symptom-based severity score for haemorrhoidal disease: the Sodergren score. Colorectal Dis. 2015 Jul;17(7):612-8. doi: 10.1111/codi.12903. — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary HET Treatment effect on hemorrhoid symptoms The effect of HET on symptoms of bleeding, pain, prolapse, itching, and soiling. 3 weeks to 6 months to 1 year
Secondary Pain associated with HET Evaluation of pain associated with the procedure itself using visual analog scale for pain to record outcome Immediately to 3 weeks to 2 months
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT06216223 - Laser Versus Surgery in Anal Diseases in Inflammatory Bowel Patients N/A
Withdrawn NCT02851940 - Pain and Bleeding Following Hypertonic Saline Sclerotherapy Compared to Brand Ligation for Symptomatic Hemorrhoids N/A
Recruiting NCT02301052 - Evaluation of Allium Ampeloprasum Spp.Iranicum Cream Effect for the Management of Hemorrhoids Symptoms Phase 1/Phase 2
Completed NCT02216305 - HAL-RAR Versus Hemorrhoidectomy in the Treatment of Grade III-IV Hemorrhoids. Prospective, Randomized Trial N/A
Completed NCT02358174 - Hemorrhoids and Metalloproteinases, Observational Study N/A
Completed NCT01483833 - Efficacy Study of Iferanserin to Treat Hemorrhoids Phase 2
Completed NCT00397137 - Stapled Anopexy Versus Closed Haemorrhoidectomy for Haemorrhoids N/A
Completed NCT00841620 - Symptom Control 1-year After Circular Stapler Anopexy or Diathermy Excision for Prolapsed Haemorhoids Phase 4
Completed NCT06459739 - Effect of Sacral Erector Spinae Plane Block on Hemorrhoid and Pilonidal Sinus Surgery N/A
Completed NCT04276298 - Topical Analgesia Post-Haemorrhoidectomy Phase 2/Phase 3
Completed NCT04675177 - Polidocanol Foam VS Artery Ligation in Hemorrhoidal Disease Phase 2/Phase 3
Recruiting NCT05889962 - Ultrasound-guided Pudendal Nerve Block for Pain After Hemorrhoidectomy N/A
Recruiting NCT01961739 - Topical 2% Lidocaine for the Treatment of Symptomatic Hemorrhoids Phase 2/Phase 3
Active, not recruiting NCT02061176 - THD Versus Open Haemorrhoidectomy N/A
Withdrawn NCT00512044 - Local Versus General Anaesthesia in Stapled Hemorrhoidectomy Phase 4
Completed NCT04031131 - The Use of Topical Anaesthetic in the Banding of Internal Haemorrhoids Phase 2
Recruiting NCT04329364 - RCT Comparing Conventional Haemorrhoidectomy With Laser Haemorrhoidoplasty Phase 2/Phase 3
Completed NCT05247333 - Implementation of a Minor Ailment Service in Community Pharmacy Practice N/A
Completed NCT04567485 - Impact of Moderate to Severe Pain in the Post-intervention Monitoring Room After Hemorrhoidectomy on the Length of Stay in the Outpatient Surgery Unit
Completed NCT03298997 - Ligation and Hemorrhoidopexy Technique Versus Ligation of Hemorrhoidal Arteries Using Ultrasound for Hemorrhoids N/A