The Possible Influence of Health Promotion Coaching on Health Related and Organizational Outcomes Among Nurses

Healthy Clinical Trial

Official title:

The Possible Influence of Health Promotion Coaching on Health Related and Organizational Outcomes Among Nurses

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Not yet recruiting

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT01172834
• Other study ID #: TASMC-09-IS-0258-09-TLV-CTIL
• Status: Not yet recruiting
• Phase: N/A
• First received: July 18, 2010
• Last updated: July 29, 2010
• Start date: January 2011
• Est. completion date: December 2011

Study information

• Verified date: July 2010
• Source: Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center
• Contact: Izthak Shapira, MD
• Phone: 972-52-4262626
• Email: shapiraiz[@]tasmc.health.gov.il
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Health authority: Israel: Ethics Commission
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Strong evidence shows that physical activity (PA) has favorable psychological and health related outcomes. However, most employees do not perform enough PA to achieve health and well being benefits. Worksite interventions aimed at improving PA often yield modest effect sizes, and their theoretical ground is not profound. The Health Action Process Approach (HAPA), is a novel comprehensive theoretical model for health behavior change, that hasn't been studied as a whole in a worksite intervention study.

The objectives of the proposed study are:

1. To develop a coaching-based group intervention that will be both grounded in theory (HAPA) as well as applicable.

2. To evaluate the feasibility of conducting this intervention among employed hospital nurses, using a randomized controlled design, interviews and other evaluation procedures.

The proposed study will offer the most comprehensive empirical test to date of the full HAPA model.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Not yet recruiting
• Enrollment: 120
• Est. completion date: December 2011
• Est. primary completion date: August 2011
• Accepts healthy volunteers: Accepts Healthy Volunteers
• Gender: Both
• Age group: 18 Years to 80 Years

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Nurses working in a full time capacity at Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center.

Exclusion Criteria:

• None nurses or nurses working part-time at Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center.

• Nurses not working at Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center.

Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Intervention Model: Crossover Assignment, Masking: Single Blind (Subject), Primary Purpose: Supportive Care

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Healthy

Intervention

Behavioral:
• Health Coaching
A manual-driven group Health Coaching intervention. Once a week for 3 months.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Israel	Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center	Tel-Aviv

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center	Tel Aviv University

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Israel, 

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Metabolic Syndrome Ratings	(Blood pressure, Sugar levels, HDL, Triglycerides, Weight)	Time 0	No
Primary	Metabolic Syndrome Ratings	(Blood pressure, Sugar levels, HDL, Triglycerides, Weight)	Time 1 - 3 months Follow up	No
Primary	Metabolic Syndrome Ratings	(Blood pressure, Sugar levels, HDL, Triglycerides, Weight)	Time 2 - 6 Months Follow up	No
Primary	Metabolic Syndrome Ratings	(Blood pressure, Sugar levels, HDL, Triglycerides, Weight)	Time 3 - 9 Months Follow up	No
Secondary	Organizational Behavior Ratings	Absenteeism,Perceived Organizational Support, Organizational Cynicism, Vigor, exhaustion, Peer Support, Social networks	Time 0	No
Secondary	Psychological Ratings	Subjective Well-Being, Psychological Well-Being, Positive and Negative Affect, Self Efficacy, HAPA Stage	Time 0	No
Secondary	Demographic ratings	Age, Gender, Seniority, Marital Status, Number of Kids	Time 0	No
Secondary	Coaching Process Ratings	Goal Attainment	Time 0	No
Secondary	Organizational Behavior Ratings	Absenteeism,Perceived Organizational Support, Organizational Cynicism, Vigor, exhaustion, Peer Support, Social networks	Time 1 - 3 months follow up	No
Secondary	Organizational Behavior Ratings	Absenteeism,Perceived Organizational Support, Organizational Cynicism, Vigor, exhaustion, Peer Support, Social networks	Time 2 - 6 Months Follow up	No
Secondary	Psychological Ratings	Subjective Well-Being, Psychological Well-Being, Positive and Negative Affect, Self Efficacy, HAPA Stage	Time 1 - 3 months follow up	No
Secondary	Psychological Ratings	Subjective Well-Being, Psychological Well-Being, Positive and Negative Affect, Self Efficacy, HAPA Stage	Time 2 - 6 Months Follow up	No
Secondary	Coaching Process Ratings	Goal Attainment	Time 1 - 3 months follow up	No
Secondary	Coaching Process Ratings	Goal Attainment	Time 2 - 6 Months Follow up	No
Secondary	Organizational Behavior Ratings	Absenteeism,Perceived Organizational Support, Organizational Cynicism, Vigor, exhaustion, Peer Support, Social networks	Time 3 - 9 Months Follow up	No
Secondary	Psychological Ratings	Subjective Well-Being, Psychological Well-Being, Positive and Negative Affect, Self Efficacy, HAPA Stage	Time 3 - 9 Months Follow up	No
Secondary	Coaching Process Ratings	Goal Attainment	Time 3 - 9 Months Follow up	No