Glaucoma Clinical Trial
Official title:
Observational/Prospective Study for Benchmarking the Management of Glaucoma With Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty (SLT) or Trabecular Stent Bypass Microsurgery, Using the Diopsys Visual Evoked Potential/Pattern ERG Protocols
Establish electrophysiological benchmarks, using the Diopsys Visual Evoked Potential/ Pattern ERG (VEP/PERG) protocols of populations with Glaucoma following: 1) Baseline VEP/ERG prior to treatment; and 2) VEP/PERG after treatment.
The VEP and PERG have been proven and accepted as a viable clinical tool in the assessment of
diseases of the retina ganglion cells. The Diopsys® Neuro Optic Vision Assessment Vision
(NOVA) Testing System generates a battery of retinal responses evoked by viewing
horizontal/checkerboard grating patterns with optimized contrast levels and visual field
sizes.
Electrophysiological tests evaluate the function of the different structures constituting the
visual nervous pathways (retina, optic nerve, optic tract, and chiasm, radiation and cerebral
cortex). Among the various electrophysiological examinations, two very important tests are
Electroretinograms (ERGs), which study the various retinal components, and Visual Evoked
Potentials (VEPs) which study the visual pathway. These tests provide objective information
on the function of the visual system even in those cases in which opacities of dioptric means
(cataract, corneal leukoma) do not allow the direct observation of the retina and optic
nerve, and may provide functional information in advance of structural changes.
Maculopathy and neuropathies are included in the long list of diseases of the visual pathway
that permanently impair visual function. As there are considerable evidences related to the
nature and evaluation of maculopathy and glaucomatous neuropathy, objective and reliable
techniques are needed for visual function evaluation. By using PERG recordings, doctors are
able to differentiate between normal subjects and subjects with ocular hypertension
notwithstanding a normal optic disc and VF. PERG can provide important diagnostic information
regarding the functional integrity of the macula and ganglion cells.
Based on a longitudinal study from Bascom Palmer Eye, abnormal retina function was recorded
by PERG eight years before structural damage to the RNFL was detected. The study suggests
that for glaucoma suspects it takes two years for a 10% change in PERG amplitude while it
takes ten years for 10% change in RNFL.
The Diopsys® NOVA-pERG is a retinal biopotential that is evoked when a temporally
phase-reversed horizontal/checkerboard grating pattern of constant total luminance is viewed.
The contrast and viewing angle of the stimulus is optimized to elicit detection of
dysfunction of the macula or the retinal ganglion cells selectively. The two NOVA-PERG
reporting protocols are Contrast Sensitivity (CS) and Concentric Stimulus Fields (CSF). CS is
optimized to detect dysfunctions of the retina that are sensitive to discrimination between
different contrast levels while the CSF is optimized to localized pathologies in specific
regions of the retina such as central vision and macula. Currently both protocols utilize
steady-state technology.
The advantage of the Diopsys ERG as compared to traditional PERG is that it is non-invasive
electrodes are attached to the eyelid and not the conjunctiva, and takes ten minutes to
perform instead of 45. Patients do not been to be dark-adapted.
VEPs will be generated using a commercially available Diopsys NOVA System utilizing a fixed
protocol. The stimulus will be presented on a 17-inch LCD monitor, running at 75 frames/s.
Commercially available skin preparation and EEG paste will be used for recording of the
SD-tVEP. Synchronized single-channel VEPs will be recorded, generating a time series of 1024
data points per analysis window. The room luminance will be maintained at scotopic conditions
(<0.3 NITS). Preadaptation will be unnecessary for the SD-tVEP recordings. Multiple tests are
run to comprise one SD-tVEP protocol. One complete NOVA-VEP (FP) presents a stimulus for a
maximum of 1 minute and 46 seconds.
In all cases, the display will be viewed through natural pupils (undilated) with optimal
refractive correction in place. The viewing distance will be set to 1 m, yielding a total
display viewing angle of 15.5 degrees. The square black/white checkerboard pattern reversal
stimulus has a height and width of 27 cm with a red circular ring used as a fixation target.
The diameter of the target is approximately 1.5 cm with a ring thickness of 1.5 mm. The
target ring will be centered on the stimulus. The check size will be 29.0 minutes of arc. Two
pattern contrasts will be used in the study, based on earlier studies that suggested that
differential contrast stimulation could affect the NOVA-VEP (FP) waveforms. The first pattern
will have a Michelson contrast of 15%. The second pattern will have a Michelson contrast of
85%. These two patterns are referred to as LC (Low contrast) and HC (High contrast)
respectively.
During a recording session, the contrast polarity of each stimulus check will be temporally
modulated at a reversal frequency of 1 Hz (2 pattern reversals equates to 1 reversal cycle);
therefore, each reversal occurs at 2 Hz or twice per second. This stimulus is termed a
pattern reversal stimulus and has a duty cycle of 50%. The 15% and 85% contrast stimuli will
be presented for each eye (the fellow eye was covered) for 15 seconds. The right eye will be
the first one to be tested for all patients.
In preparation for recording, the skin at each electrode site will be scrubbed with Nuprep
using a cotton gauze pad. Electrodes will be fixed in position with Ten20 conductive paste
and secured with a small gauze pad with conductive paste applied. Electrode impedance will be
maintained below 10 kohm and typically kept below 5 kohm.
The Pattern Electroretinogram (PERG) will be recorded using a commercially available system
Diopsys® NOVA (Diopsys, Inc. Pine Brook, New Jersey). The testing protocol will include the
Concentric Stimulus Field (CSF).
Subjects will be fitted with the appropriate correction for a viewing distance of 24 inches
and will be instructed to fixate on a target at the center of stimulus monitor. The test will
be performed in a dark room to standardized environment luminance, free of visual and audible
distractions. The subject will be comfortable seated facing the stimulus monitor. The
patient's seated height will be adjusted so the eye stays in a horizontal plane with the
center of the monitor. The test will be performed without pupil dilation and subjects will be
allowed to blink freely.
The PERG will be recorded from the study eye by means of hypoallergenic skin sensors
Silver/Silver Chloride ink (Diopsys® proprietary Skin Sensor) on the lower eyelids. The
reference sensor will be located in the contralateral eyelid and ground sensor in the central
forehead area (Fz). The skin will be prepared by cleaning with eyelid cleanser (OCuSOFT®) to
ensure good and stable electrical conductivity, keeping the impedances bellow 5 kohm.
The stimulus will be presented on a gamma corrected Acer V173BM 17-inch LCD monitor, having a
refresh rate of 75 frames / second. The CSF pattern stimulus will consist of black/white
horizontal gratings (24° and 16° circular field, 98% contrast and 102.28 candelas/m2 mean
luminance), reversing at 15 reversals/second) with a duration of 25 seconds. A red spinning
ring will be used as a fixation target with a diameter of 1 cm and 1 mm of thickness. This
target ring will be at the corner of four checks, centered on the stimulus field.
A test will be categorized as non-reliable if Phase Variance is greater than 0.4 and/or if
the Magnitude Variance to Magnitude Ratio (VMR) is greater than 2.9 and/or if more than 4
artifacts are detected. The FERG test results will be saved in an SQL database and presented
in a report form to be used for analysis.
;
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT06000865 -
Glaucoma Rehabilitation With Action viDeo Games and Exercise - GRADE
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06278597 -
Automatic Evaluation of the Anterior Chamber Angle Width by a New Non-contact Optical Device
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04271709 -
Manhattan Vision Screening and Follow-Up Study (NYC-SIGHT)
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03274024 -
The Asia Primary Tube Versus Trab (TVT) Study
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04552964 -
Assessment of the Impact of an add-on and Its Smartphone Application on the Daily Management of Glaucoma
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT01957267 -
Functional and Structural Imaging for Glaucoma
|
||
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04624698 -
iStent Inject New Enrollment Post-Approval Study
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04020705 -
The Efficacy of Citicoline in Eyedrops (OMK1) in Reducing the Progression of Glaucoma
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03150160 -
Additive Effect of Twice-daily Brinzolamide 1%/Brimonidine 0.2%Combination as an Adjunctive Therapy to Travoprost in Patients With Normal Tension Glaucoma
|
Phase 4 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05581498 -
Glaucoma Exercise as Medicine Study (GEMS).
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT02921568 -
Side-by-Side Comparison of P200TE and Spectral OCT/SLO on Diseased Eyes
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT02901730 -
Clinical Study of LPI With Different Laser Wavelengths
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02955849 -
A Trial of China Laser and Surgery Study Glaucoma in Rural China
|
Early Phase 1 | |
Recruiting |
NCT02471105 -
Investigation of IOP and Tolerability of Bimatoprost 0.01% and Tafluprost Unit Dose Preservative Free 15 Microgram/ml
|
Phase 4 | |
Recruiting |
NCT02554214 -
Pilot Clinical Trial on a New Adjustable Glaucoma Drainage Device
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT02390284 -
Stop Retinal Ganglion Cell Dysfunction Study
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT02653963 -
Triamcinolone for Ahmed Glaucoma Valve
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02520674 -
Glaucoma Screening With Smartphone Ophthalmology
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02628223 -
180 Degree vs. 360 Degree Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty as Initial Therapy for Glaucoma
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02390245 -
Philadelphia Telemedicine Glaucoma Detection and Follow-Up Study
|
N/A |