View clinical trials related to Gingival Recession.
Filter by:this study is a Clinical evaluation of using Xenogenic collagen matrix (XCM) plus coronally advanced flap (CAF) compared to subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG) plus coronally advanced flap to treat Miller class I gingival recession. A split-full-split thickness flap will be elevated in the (XCM+CAF) group while it will be an only partial thickness flap in the (SCTG+CAF) group. The sample size will be 15 patients. Each patient has bilateral Miller Class I gingival recessions; and as a split-mouth study design one side will be treated with (SCTG+CAF), while the other will be treated with (XCM+CAF).
The aim of this prospective study is to assess the effects of definitive abutment connection at the time of implant placement on bone level changes in the areas of the posterior maxilla and mandible.
In this study it will be investigated the usefulness of Platelet-Rich Fibrin (PRF) on in the full thickness palatal graft donor site healing acceleration and in the patient's morbidity reduction. Eighty patients, with at least one gingival recession will be treated by a flap with connective tissue graft(CTG). In the test group (20 patients) and in the control group 2 a quadruple layer of PRF membrane will be placed over the palatal wounds; conversely, the control groups 2-4 patients will be treated by an absorbable gelatin sponge. Patients will be monitored at 1, 2, 3 and 4 weeks after surgery for the complete re-epithelialization of the palatal wound (CWE), the alteration of sensibility (AS) around the wound area, the post-operative discomfort (D), and the changes of feeding habits (CFH) by a visual analogic scale (VAS) evaluation. Furthermore, the analgesics consumption and the existence of delayed bleeding from the palatal wound (DWB) during the first post-operative week will be assessed.
Aim: The aim of this study was to determine whether the combined connective tissue graft (CTG) with injectable platelet rich fibrin (i-prf) with coronally advanced flap (CAF) improved root coverage of deep Miller Class I or II gingival recessions compared to CTG alone with CAF. Methods: Seventy-two patients with Miller class I and II gingival recessions were enrolled. Thirty-six patients were randomly assigned to the test group (CAF+CTG+i-prf) or control group (CAF+CTG). Clinical evaluations were made at 6 months
In this randomized controlled clinical trial we will compare the clinical outcome of Full thickness palatal graft technique (FTPGT) to coronally advanced flap (CAF) + subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG) in the treatment of RT1 (Cairo et al. classification) recessions. Forty patients, presenting at least one RT1 recession, will be treated with bilaminar procedures . 20 participants will receive FTPGT approach (test group) and 20 patients will undergo CAF+SCTG (control group). Complete root coverage (CRC) will be assumed as the main outcome at 12 months after treatment. Gingival recession (GR), clinical attachment level (CAL), pocket depth (PD), keratinized tissue width (KT,) thickness of keratinized tissue (GT) will be assessed at baseline and 12 months after treatment. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) will be reported: namely, the number of painkiller tablets taken during the first week, the degree of general discomfort (D) experienced assessed on a VAS scale (0-10), the extent of changes in their eating habits (CFH), dentin hypersensitivity (DH), patient-reported aesthetic satisfaction (PRES) quantified on a VAS scale (0-10) and overall treatment satisfaction (OTS).
Few studies evaluate the outcomes beyond 1 year follow up for gingival recessions treatments using the tunnel technique in combination with connective tissue graft. The aim of this randomized controlled trial (RCT) was to compare the 4-year outcomes of the CAF versus the pouch/tunnel (TUN) technique both associated with CTG.
This study evaluates the clinical and biological effects of leucocyte and platelet-rich fibrin (L-PRF) on intraoral wound healing.
The study team proposes to prospectively compare the healing outcomes of autogenous soft tissue connective tissue graft (CTG) and Acellular dermis matrix (ADM) in a split-mouth design study for patients requiring modification of gingival soft tissue biotype. The researchers aim to investigate the earlier phase of graft healing after the grafting surgery by biopsy histology and by examining the alteration of gene profile during the healing of gingival tissue healing by molecular cell biological techniques.
This randomized clinical comparative study will evaluate the postoperative pain following the FGG graft harvest procedure technique covered by four different methods for coverage of the palatal donor site.
This study attempts to assess the effect of orthodontic treatment on the stability of pre-orthodontic recession coverage by connective tissue graft- a randomized controlled clinical trial and thus facilitate better evidence based treatment protocol.