View clinical trials related to Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage.
Filter by:The purpose of this multicenter, two component observational and standardized case-control study is to evaluate risk factors of gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding with a prospective 3-month and 12-month follow-up to examine outcomes and their possible causes.
The aim of this study is to assess of effect of Surgicel® (Fibrillar) for preventing delayed bleeding after endoscopic hemostasis in non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding
Prospective-randomized trial. Patients with recurrent bleeding from gastroduodenal ulcers are randomized into either endoscopic treatment with the OTSC [Over The Scope Clip] or endoscopic standard therapy. Hypothesis: Endoscopic therapy with OTSC is superior to standard therapy regarding technical success and rebleeding.
This study is to see whether the early intravenous administration of tranexamic acid improves the outcome of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
Patients with atrial fibrillation requiring anticoagulation treatment are at high risk of gastrointestinal bleeding. The investigators propose the percutaneous stop the oral anticoagulation and closure of the left atrial appendage with the Amplatzer ® system in patients receiving anticoagulant therapy for atrial fibrillation without associated valvular heart disease, to reduce significantly the risk of stroke while minimizing the risk of bleeding in a group of patients with high risk for both events. ELIGIBLE trial(Left atrial appendage Efficacy of GastroIntestinal Bleeding after closure) is a prospective, multicentric and randomized (2 to 1) trial, comparing percutaneous closure of atrial appendage left versus standard treatment with oral anticoagulants in patients with history of gastrointestinal bleeding and high embolic risk.
This study will evaluate the use of RightBio Metrics' RightSpot device used to determine if there is proper placement of a nasogastric or orogastric tube.
Perioperative usage of immunonutrition (ANOM®) can attenuate the pro-inflammatory cytokines and reduce postoperative infectious complications and length of hospital stay after major upper gastrointestinal surgery. (ANOM®)immunonutrition product name
A bleeding peptic ulcer remains a serious medical problem with significant morbidity and mortality. Endoscopic therapy significantly reduces further bleeding, surgery, and mortality in patients with bleeding peptic ulcers and is now recommended as the first hemostatic modality for these patients. In the past few years, adjuvant use of a high-dose proton pump inhibitor (PPI) after endoscopic therapy has been endorsed in some studies. However, low dose of PPI has also been supported in the management of these patients. The investigators enroll 130 patients with active bleeding or nonbleeding visible vessels in this study. They are randomly assigned as 40 mg/day or 160mg/day IV nexium group. All patients receive successful endoscopic therapy with heater probe or hemoclip placement. In the low dose group (N=65), 40 mg IV Nexium daily is given for three days. Thereafter, the patients receive 40 mg nexium orally daily for two months. In the large dose group (N=65), 160 mg/day continuous infusion is given for three days. Thereafter, the patients receive 40 mg nexium orally daily for two months. The primary end point is recurrent bleeding before discharge and within 14 days. At day 14, volume of blood transfused, number of surgeries performed, and the mortality rates of the two groups are compared as well.
The patients who admit to emergency department with upper gastrointestinal system bleeding will undergo a clinical evaluation with Rockall Risk Scoring System. The patients with Rockall score of 1 or less will be discharged with medical treatment, and will have an elective upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in the end of the 30th day. The impact of Rockall Risk Scoring System on assessing the necessity of emergency endoscopy, length of hospital stay, morbidity, and mortality in low-risk patients will be evaluated.
Introduction: Proton pump inhibitor (PPI) is the drug of choice used in patients with non-variceal upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding (UGIB). Intravenous (IV) PPI is more commonly used than oral form when overt bleeding occurs. Previous study has revealed that oral rabeprazole and IV omeprazole achieved similar intragastric pH elevation. It's probable that oral form and IV PPI provide equal efficacy in treating mild to moderate UGIB patients. Aim: This study aims to compare the effect of three-day oral rabeprazole and iv omeprazole on bleeding control in patients with mild to moderate non-variceal UGIB. Patients and methods: All patients presented with black to tarry stool passage or hematemesis and visited our ER will be evaluated to recruit into this study. They will receive regular vital sign monitoring, laboratory study and nasogastric tube insertion with gastric fluid aspiration. Esophagogastroendoscopy and hemostatic procedure if need will be performed within 12 hours. Those confirmed to have non-variceal UGIB, stable vital signs and agree to participate into this study will be randomized into two groups receiving either oral rabeprazole (20mg bid) or iv omeprazole (40mg qd) for three days. The presence of recurrent bleeding within three days, in-hospital complication and duration of hospital stay will be recorded and analyzed. Expected results: At the end of this study, we will be able to determine whether patients treated with oral rabeprazole and iv omeprazole have similar re-bleeding or complication rates and hospitalization days.