View clinical trials related to Gastric Cancer.
Filter by:This is a prospective, single-center, single-arm, phase 2 trial to evaluate the feasibility and safety of neoadjuvant transcatheter infusion and embolism (TACiE) in patients with locally advanced adenocarcinoma of stomach and gastroesophageal junction. The TACiE protocol includes four cycles. Transcatheter oxaliplatin and concurrent embolism on day 1 and oral S-1 on day 1-14 will be administrated in the first and third cycles. Intra-venous oxaliplatin on day 1 and oral S-1 on day 1-14 (SOX) will be administrated in the second and fourth cycles.
Data demonstrating the efficacy of PIPAC in patients with regionally advanced gastric cancer with positive peritoneal cytology and/or minimal peritoneal disease is limited due to the relatively recent development of this technique and its historical preferential use in palliative patients with disseminated peritoneal metastasis. Existing data suggest PIPAC administered every six weeks in conjunction with standard treatment may work as an adjunct to conventional systemic neoadjuvant chemotherapy. PIPAC protocols have been established both for gastric cancer as well as other intra-abdominal malignancies and have a good safety profile. Given these promising findings, a study protocol is proposed herein to further investigate PIPAC for the treatment of a highly selected group of patients with regionally advanced gastric cancer (positive peritoneal cytology and/or minimal peritoneal disease).
Patients with stage cT3-4N+M0 gastric cancer were recommended to receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy before radical surgery in terms of the eradication of micrometastasis in addition to local control, higher compliance with intensive chemotherapy, and avoidance of futile surgery by detection of initially invisible distant metastasis after rapid disease progression. However, in some studies, gastrectomy followed by neoadjuvant chemotherapy failed to demonstrate survival benefits for these patients. And peritoneal recurrence was the most common and devastating reason. Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) was introduced for peritoneal cancer last century. A few studies suggested HIPEC could improve prognosis in patients with limited peritoneal metastasis from various cancer. In summary, we conducted this study to confirm the efficacy and safety of HIPEC after gastrectomy in patients with advanced gastric cancer received neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Gastric cancer is the sixth most common cancer and the third most common cause of cancer-related death in the world. The American Cancer Society estimates that about 26,560 cases of stomach cancer (16,160 in men and 10,400 in women) will be diagnosed in 2021. Median age at diagnosis is 68 years. Decreases in gastric cancer have been attributed in part to widespread use of refrigeration. Other factors likely contributing to the decline in stomach cancer rates include lower rates of chronic Helicobacter pylori infection, thanks to improved sanitation and use of antibiotics, and increased screening in some countries. Surgical resection is the principal therapy for gastric cancer, as it offers the only potential for cure. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy has an established role in the management of gastric cancer. Perioperative chemotherapy, or postoperative chemotherapy plus chemoradiation, are preferred for localized gastric cancer. Because of lower toxicity, two-drug cytotoxic regimens are preferred for patients with advanced disease. Adjuvant radiotherapy is associated with improvements in both overall and relapse-free survival and reductions in locoregional failure.
Although Pembrolizumab plus trastuzumab and chemotherapy is the standard of care for first-line treatment of HER2-positive advanced or metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) cancer,there is no established therapy in the second-line setting. RC48 showed promising activity with manageable safety in patients with HER2-overexpressing, advanced G/GEJ cancer who have previously received at least two lines of chemotherapy.Fruquintinib in combination with Paclitaxel demonstrated encouraging preliminary clinical antitumor activity in patients with advanced GC in ph1b/2 study. This study is aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Fruquintinib in combination with RC48 in the treatment of previously treated HER2-positive locally advanced or metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) cancer.
To evaluate the clinical efficacy (safety, feasibility and long-term efficacy) of robotic radical total gastrectomy and laparoscopic radical total gastrectomy in patients with locally advanced middle and upper gastric adenocarcinoma (CT2-4A, N-/+, M0) .
This trial is an investigator-initiated, single-center, open-label, single-arm exploratory study of mRNA neoantigen tumor vaccine in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer, including two phases: dose escalation and dose expansion. To evaluate the safety and tolerability of neoantigen tumor vaccine in subjects with advanced gastric cancer by conducting dose escalation trial in subjects diagnosed with advanced gastric cancer, and preliminarily evaluate the efficacy of neoantigen tumor vaccine in subjects with advanced gastric cancer. According to the characteristics of safety and efficacy data in the dose escalation phase, the dose expansion is performed at the intended clinical dose based on the investigator's judgment, and the treatment is performed in combination with PD-1/L1 to further evaluate the efficacy and safety profile of neoantigen tumor vaccine at a specific dose. Both the dose escalation phase and dose expansion phase include a screening period (Week -4 ~ Week -2), a baseline period (Week -1 ~ Day -1), a treatment period (Day 1 ~ Week 8 or 16), and a follow-up period. Subjects who signed and provided the formal informed consent entered the screening period. The treatment period included the initial treatment period (Day 1 ~ Week 8) and the enhanced treatment period (Week 12 ~ Week 16). The investigator determined whether to enter the enhanced treatment period based on the comprehensive judgment of the subject's efficacy, safety, compliance and other factors from Week 8 to Week 12. In the dose escalation phase, 18 subjects are expected to be enrolled at 100 μg, 200 μg and 400 μg (6 subjects in 100 μg, 6 subjects in 200 μg and 6 subjects in 400 μg). The low dose group was enrolled first, and the next dose group was started when the number of subjects met the requirements. If any subject withdrew early, the low dose group was given priority. The investigator will choose the optimal clinical dose for dose expansion, which can be one dose group or multiple dose groups. PD-1/L1 drugs are used in parallel to further confirm the efficacy and safety of neoantigen tumor vaccine, with about 18 subjects. The usage and dosage of PD-1/L1 should aligned with the package insert.
This trial is a multi-center, open, single-arm, superior phase II clinical study.
In this study, the investigators aimed to identify independent prognostic factors for early postoperative complications and survival in elderly patients (aged ≥65 years) with gastric cancer.
By uploading pre-operative patient information and patient CT data to RUS™, a virtual surgical environment with patient-specific relief prediction models can be provided. First, after uploading the CT and clinical information of a gastric cancer patient diagnosed with gastric cancer through an actual endoscopic biopsy and scheduled for robotic total gastrectomy, RUS™ will operate normally to check whether patient-specific surgical navigation is available before or during surgery. In particular, when using the patient-specific surgery simulation system provided by RUS™, the CT information provides a patient-specific 3D environment well, so it will be checked regarding whether the surgeon can use it before or during surgery without any particular problems. Using RUS™ software, navigation information is used before or during surgery, and among these, parts that can be quantitatively compared with actual measurements will be evaluated as a secondary research goal. After the surgery, the investigators plan to check the amount of bleeding, duration of hospitalization, and the rate of complications by performing robot gastrointestinal resection using the navigation system to ensure that there are no problems with patient safety.