View clinical trials related to Fear.
Filter by:The purpose of this study is to evaluate the experience of labor in parous women induced because of fear of labor and, to compare the experience of parous women induced without fear of labor. A comparison with the experience of women delivered with elective cesarean section because of fear of labor is done. In the induced labors, the induction method is amniotomy. Between groups the experience of delivery is evaluated with a questionnaire: Wijma Delivery Expectancy Questionnaire(WEDQ-B). Groups are also compared with regard to time from induction to delivery and rate of operative delivery. Hypotheses: - there is no difference in experience of delivery - there is no difference in time to delivery or rate of operative deliveries
Dental fear and anxiety in children constitue a crucial challenge to dental care delivery as well as future behavior related to dental problems in children. A common cause of such anxiety and fear is the procedural intervention that uses needles and syringes since a visual impact due to the needle acts as a deterrent to the child's cooperation during dental procedures. We therefore improvised the syringe such that it will camouflage the needle. We hypothesized that the use of this needle will alleviate the child's anxiety and therefore will demonstrate improved outcomes related to pain, fear and anxiety. This study is a group randomized trial to test the efficacy of the camouflage syringe as compared to the conventional syringe in children.
This study will evaluate whether the drug D-cycloserine (DCS) can improve a type of learning called classical conditioning, in which the brain learns to associate neutral stimuli with stimuli that elicit emotional or physiological responses. DCS is an antibiotic that was initially approved to treat tuberculosis and has been tested in clinical trials over the last decade for enhancing cognitive function. This protocol includes both a pilot study and a main study. The main study will begin after the pilot study ends. Healthy normal volunteers between 18 and 45 years of age may be eligible for these studies. Candidates will be screened with a medical and psychiatric history and a physical examination that includes blood and urine samples, an electrocardiogram (EKG), hearing test and startle test. The startle test involves recording eyeblink responses to loud noises. After the screening visit, those enrolled will participate in the pilot or main study, in which their reactions to two types of stimuli-an unpleasant, but harmless, shock to the arm and a mild puff of air to the eye-will be measured and recorded. - Pilot Study Session 1 - Participants will receive very brief electric shocks delivered through two electrodes attached to the forearm or fingers and will hear brief loud sounds that may startle. Geometric shapes will be presented on a computer monitor. Sessions 2 and 3 - The procedure is the same as in session 1, except participants will also be subjected to brief low-intensity tones and airpuffs to the eye. - Main Study Participants will undergo the same procedures described in the pilot study, with the following additions: - They will have an intravenous tube placed in a vein for collecting blood during the test. - They will take a pill each test day that contains either 100 mg DCS, 500 mg DCS, or a placebo (inactive substance). Subjects assigned to receive DCS will get the active drug on only one of the three test sessions and will be given placebo the other two sessions. The placebo group will receive placebo all three sessions. In both the pilot and main study, subjects' physiological responses to the stimuli will be recorded. Electrodes will be placed on two fingers (to measure sweat, or electrodermal activity), on the ribcage midway between the waist and armpit (to measure heart rate), and under one eye (to measure eye blink). Pulse will be recorded with a device attached to a finger, and breathing rate will be recorded with a special belt placed around the chest. At various times during the sessions, subjects will fill out questionnaires about their experience. Participants may withdraw from the study at any point.
The purpose of this study is to use brain imaging technology to investigate brain changes in people exposed to predictable versus unpredictable unpleasant stimuli. Unpleasant events that can be predicted evoke a response of fear, whereas unpredictable, unpleasant stimuli cause chronic anxiety not associated with a specific event. Information gained from this study may help in the development of more effective treatments for anxiety disorders. When confronted with fearful events, people eventually develop fear of specific cues that were associated with these events as well as to the environmental context in which the fearful event occurred. Evidence suggests that cued fear and contextual fear model different aspects of anxiety. However, studies that examine the way the brain affects expression of contextual fear have not been conducted. This study will use magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or Magneto-encephalography (MEG) to compare the brain activity underlying fear brought on by predictable and unpredictable aversive stimuli.