Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Recruiting
Administrative data
| NCT number |
NCT06225193 |
| Other study ID # |
022.HEP.2023.D |
| Secondary ID |
|
| Status |
Recruiting |
| Phase |
|
| First received |
|
| Last updated |
|
| Start date |
June 20, 2023 |
| Est. completion date |
June 23, 2024 |
Study information
| Verified date |
January 2024 |
| Source |
Methodist Health System |
| Contact |
Kavya Vinod Mankulangara, PharmD |
| Phone |
214-947-4681 |
| Email |
MHSIRB[@]mhd.com |
| Is FDA regulated |
No |
| Health authority |
|
| Study type |
Observational
|
Clinical Trial Summary
In this initial investigator-initiated retrospective study, aim to analyze the enhanced liver
fibrosis (ELF) scores in this high-risk population for NAFLD/nonalcoholic
steatohepatitis(NASH)-related fibrosis. Study define 'high-risk' to include metabolic
syndrome, which can be further defined by an atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD)
score >7.5, any diagnosis of hyperlipidemia, history of coronary artery disease, history of
heart failure, hypertension and/or type 2 diabetes. Study would also like to compare the
performance of this score with historical methods of fibrosis assessment, where applicable,
including vibration-controlled transient elastography, magnetic resonance elastography, blood
markers and liver biopsy. Study will assess the impact of ELF scores on predicting liver
events in the time, have used it and determine if diet, lifestyle changes and/or
pharmacotherapy will improve serial ELF scores. Will also seek to understand how ELF scores
are distributed in our community.
Description:
Methodist Health System consists of nine hospitals and over one hundred clinics that serve 7%
to 10% of patients in the Dallas metropolitan. In November 2021, adopted the use of ELF tests
in patients who had risk factors for NAFLD/NASH based on abnormal liver enzymes, metabolic
risk factors, and evidence of hepatosteatosis on imaging. There is a knowledge gap in the
literature when it comes to ELF scores in our population and the data we collect in this
study will contribute to filling that knowledge gap.
Historically, assessment of fibrosis has been accomplished with FibroScan,elastography or
liver biopsy. However, these tests are not widely available in most clinics, and can be
invasive and costly. At present, the two primary inexpensive and non-invasive alternatives
are the fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) and ELF scores, which employ algorithms that utilize routine lab
draws. While a low FIB-4 score has a negative predictive value of 90% for advanced fibrosis,
it does not provide a risk assessment of liver-related events. For this reason, the study
explore the newer ELF serum test as a non-invasive, more affordable and available means to
detect patients with developing fibrosis and as a predictor of liver-related outcomes that
could be easily used in a primary care setting. This will better risk-stratify this patient
population at the primary care level, without need for invasive and expensive testing, and
will guide appropriate referrals to Hepatology.