View clinical trials related to Emergencies.
Filter by:Intrauterine devices (IUDs) are highly effective to prevent pregnancy when used for emergency contraception (following unprotected intercourse in the last 3 days), but data are lacking for people who desire an etonogestrel (ENG) contraceptive implant in this situation. This proposal will identify the most effective way to start an implant for emergency contraception using a randomized controlled trial comparing pregnancy risk between those receiving the implant vs. the implant plus oral emergency contraception (EC). Data from this project will inform clinical practice and add another option, the implant, for those desiring a long acting, highly effective contraceptive method when they present for emergency contraception.
Appendicitis is a common condition in children 6-17 years of age, and the top reason for emergency surgery in Canada. Children with appendicitis can have very bad pain in their belly. Children often need pain medications given to them through a needle in their arm called an intravenous (IV). The most common IV pain medication is a type of opioid called morphine. We know that opioids work well to improve pain, but there are risks and side effects when taking them. There are non-opioid medications that doctors can give to patients, like ketorolac. Ketorolac helps decrease inflammation and pain and has fewer side effects when a patient takes it for a short period of time. Our past and present overuse of opioids, driven by an unproven assumption that opioids work best for pain, resulted in an Opioid Crisis and doctors are now looking for alternatives. To do this, we need to prove that there are other options to treat children's pain that are just as good as opioids, with less side effects. The goal of our study is to discover if school aged children who arrive at the emergency department with belly pain, improve just as much with ketorolac as they do with morphine. To answer this question, we will need a very large number of patients in a study that includes several hospitals across Canada. With a flip of a coin, each participant will either get a single dose of morphine or a single dose of ketorolac. To make sure that our pain assessment is impartial, no one will know which medicine the child received except the pharmacist who prepared the medicine.
The goal of this cluster randomized clinical trial is to test the efficacy of messaging interventions to increase booster vaccine uptake in adults in the emergency department(ED). The main question[s] and goals of this study are: - does the intervention of vaccine messaging increase booster vaccine uptake at 30 days post ED visit? - does the intervention of asking about vaccine acceptance increase booster vaccine uptake at 30 days post ED visit? - considering recent national changes to funding and availability of updated vaccines, the investigators will examine the effects of these changes on vaccine acceptance and uptake in ED populations. Specifically, they will stratify EDs and ED patients according to the ED availability of vaccines, and they will also examine whether costs and availability of vaccines are a deterrent to patient acceptance and uptake of vaccines
The characterization of the bacterial or viral etiology of an infectious event is required for both isolation decisions and rationale use of antibiotics. In emergency room (ER), the direct identification of the causal pathogen is rarely available in real-time. Alternative is the identification of the host-response to either a bacterial or viral infection. One of this host-response is the expression of peripheral leukocytes cell surface markers, measured by flow cytometry. Investigators and others have reported the high diagnostic performances of combination of cell surface biomarkers to differentiate bacterial from viral infection. The CYTOBACT study aims to confirm on a 500 patients multicentric cohort (200 having already been collected during another study: SEPTIMET), the best combinations for this diagnostic issue. The study will be conducted in 3 emergency departments of APHP hospitals network in Paris, France. Patients with a suspicion of infection will be proposed to participate. No intervention will be introduced during the routine care in the (ER) which will be let at the discretion of the treating emergency physician. During the routine blood sampling in the ER, an additional 30 ml volume of whole blood will be collected, centrifugated, aliquoted and stored at -80°C for further measurement of the expression of a panel of cell surface markers. The participants will be followed up during their hospitalization (if any) and no longer than 28 days. Clinical data at admission, usual blood tests and all microbiological investigations performed during the hospital stay will be recorded into an electronic case record form (eCRF). Based on all those recorded data (excepted the results of flow cytometry for cell surface biomarkers) 2 independent adjudicators will qualify the infectious episode into bacterial,viral or no infection, and (if any) into infection, sepsis or septic shock (according to Sepsis 3.0 definitions). Using different "machine learning" statistical tools, all the combination of the cell surface biomarkers will be tested to select those with the highest performance to differentiate bacterial from viral infection.
Sepsis is an extremely common systemic condition in the Emergency Room (ER), which is found to be to be one of the leading causes of death among patients accessing the ER. To date, the diagnosis of sepsis does not rely on any specific markers for infectious conditions, but several methods of assessing the general condition of the patient, namely markers that elevate in a variety of inflammatory conditions (PCR, PCT), indices of tissue hypoxia (serum lactate), and scores based on the haemochromocytometric examination, the markers of function of different organs, and vital parameters expressed by the patient at the time of assessment (SOFA, qSOFA, SIRS, NEWS). These markers, in addition to not be specific for sepsis, have an insufficiently early peak of presentation to readily identify all patients presenting with this condition. Presepsin, as the N-terminal portion of the soluble component of Cluster of Differentiation 14 (CD14), is elevated almost exclusively in infectious conditions; moreover, its elevation in infectious contexts is extremely early compared with that of markers already in use, allowing early identification of septic patients who to date would be recognized as such only hours after the onset of the septic process. In addition, the determination of this biomarker could make it possible to stratify patients by prognosis, allowing greater attention to be paid to the most severe patients. It is hypothesized that the Presepsin assay in emergency room will allow to increase the rapidity and specificity of sepsis diagnosis compared with the diagnostic procedure currently used, improving the outcomes of patients accessing the emergency room with symptoms suggestive of sepsis. The main purpose of the present study is to evaluate the role of serum assay of presepsin in the early diagnosis of sepsis in patients presenting to the emergency department with clinical suspicion of sepsis by comparing the values obtained with traditionally used such as PCR, PCT, and blood culture. The secondary objective is to evaluate presepsin as a prognostic biomarker and useful for mortality risk stratification of the same patients, comparing the values obtained with validated predictor scores of mortality and/or severity (APACHEII, SOFA, qSOFA).
This prospective discovery study is designed to demonstrate the feasibility of using an unshielded, mobile MCG device in an Emergency Department (ED) setting. The main question it aims to answer is whether interpretable data can be reliably collected as part of an ED workflow.
This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a motivational interviewing (MI) intervention in enhancing advance care planning (ACP) among older adults who have visited the Emergency Room (ER) in the past six months and their family caregivers. The main question it aims to answer is: The effectiveness of the MI-based ACP intervention implemented within six months of an ER visit on improving older adults' advance directives (AD) completion rate. Compared to participants in the control group who will only receive a self-education booklet, participants in the intervention group will receive a motivational interview educational intervention to see the effectiveness of an MI-based ACP intervention implemented within six months following an emergency room visit regarding the completion of AD for older adults.
Rationale: Prescriptions of analgesics, especially opioids, have doubled in the Emergency department (ED) over the past decades in response to frequently reported undertreatment of pain in ED patients. Consequently, there is a shift towards a more restrained utilisation of opioids at the ED. However, there are still few (non-)pharmacological alternatives. Virtual Reality (VR) therapy is a relatively new and promising technique in non-pharmacologic pain reduction and anxiolysis and shows positive results on pain relief and pain. Objective: Primary objective is to investigate the effect of VR on patient-reported pain outcomes in the ED. Secondary objectives are to investigate the effect of VR on analgesics use, patient-reported outcomes, and process indicators and to identify barriers to implementation. Last, subanalyses will be performed to compare the effectiveness of two types of VR: VR based on distraction (VRD) and VR based on focussed attention (VRF). Study design: randomized controlled trial. Study population: Adults admitted to the ED with a NRS pain score of 4 (out of ten) or more and unacceptable pain. Intervention: There will be a control group receiving usual care and a intervention group that receives additional VR therapy. Main study parameters/endpoints: The main study outcome is the difference in patient-reported NRS pain score.
The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of early, supplementary parenteral nutrition following emergency laparotomy. Currently, parenteral nutrition is used in postoperative patients if or when oral or enteral nutrition is not feasible. However, little data exists on the optimal timing of parenteral nutrition. Oral and enteral nutrition is encouraged. Participants will randomized on the second postoperative day if their calorie intake (oral + enteral) is below 30% of the calculated requirement. Patients will be randomized to early (postoperative day 2) or postponed (postoperative day 5) start of parenteral nutrition. The combined oral + enteral + parenteral calorie target is 70-80% of the calculated requirement. Participants in the postponed group will be re-assessed on postoperative day 5, and if their calorie intake is less than 50% parenteral nutrition will be administered. The intervention will continue until oral + enteral intake is at least 70% of the calculated requirement or the participant is at his/her habitual intake.
There is currently no readily available pharmacologic intervention for suicidal ideation, a true psychiatric emergency, in the Emergency Department (ED). Investigators aim to trial low-dose, intravenous ketamine, a drug with well-established use in treatment-resistant depression, for patients who present to the ED with suicidal ideation.