View clinical trials related to Embolism.
Filter by:stroke's risk is increased in patients with pulmonary embolism and PFO compared to patients without PFO. Does this increased risk persist years after pulmonary embolism ?
This survey will allow to identify PE prognostic, but also long-term complications, i.e. recurrence rate, on-treatment bleedings, deep-vein thrombosis sequella, pulmonary hypertension rate, and chronic pulmonary disease rate without PH. This database should help us identify risk-factors for each event.
Severe COVID-19 is associated with a hypercoagulable state, with a high risk of thrombotic phenomena such as pulmonary thromboembolism (PE). Its diagnostic suspicion is complicated, due to the overlap of symptoms of PE with those of COVID-19 itself. Therefore, it is essential to improve PE prediction to optimise the performance of confirmatory imaging tests such as thoracic CT angiography. Early diagnosis has relevant therapeutic implications, as it justifies starting anticoagulant treatment early, with a possible positive impact on the clinical evolution of these patients. The CHOD risk scale has recently been described: the acronym for C-reactive protein concentration, heart rate, oxygen saturation, and D-Dimer levels. Its initial description was carried out in a study in a single hospital centre. proving to be an easy-to-apply tool, useful for predicting the appearance of PE in patients hospitalized for COVID-19. The objective of this study is to carry out an external validation of this scale in patients hospitalized for COVID-19 pneumonia, through an observational, cross-sectional, multicenter, real-life study in patients hospitalized for severe COVID-19 pneumonia, confirmed by objective methods, and showing high D-dimer values. Imaging tests with CT angiography will be performed in patients with elevated D-Dimer, following international clinical practice regulations. Given that they will be consecutive patients, CT angiography will be performed in all patients regardless of the patient's clinical probability of PE as long as they meet the inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria. To calculate the PE predictive power of the CHOD scale in the validation cohort, a methodology similar to that used in the construction cohort will be used, that is, the use of a ROC curve. Taking into account that a similar predictive value (with a maximum error of 5%) between the CHOD scale in the construction cohort and that of this study (validation cohort) will be considered as an adequate external validation, and taking into account a statistical power of 80%, an alpha error of 5% and a maximum loss of patients of 15%, the required sample size is 245 patients. Since 7 centres initially participate, each of which will have to contribute 35 valid consecutive patients for the analysis.
Pulmonary embolism (PE) is the third leading cause of cardiovascular mortality. The Pulmonary Embolism Response Team (PERT) concept offers a rapid and multidisciplinary approach focused on improving outcomes for patients with PE. All institutionalized PERTs in Poland have been invited to join the study. The goal of this registry is to describe current practice and outcomes in patients with acute PE treated by Polish PERTs.
Venous phase spectral or dual energy (DE) chest computed tomography (CT) in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism (PE) compared to standard computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA): sensitivity, evaluation of iodine mapping and incidental findings.
The objective of this study is to evaluate real world long-term functional outcomes, safety and performance of the Indigo Aspiration System for the treatment of pulmonary embolism (PE).
Cancer patients have an increased risk of perioperative complications undergoing surgery procedures. Postoperative complications caused by thrombembolic events after robot- assisted surgery in major urological procedures have been reported and associated with an increased lenght of stay in the hospital. We therefore aimed to investigate in a retrospective analysis 250 patients undergoing robotic-assisted radical cystectomy and prostatectomy procedures for risk factors for thrombembolic events in this specific patient population.
There are many available treatments for pulmonary embolism (PE), but the best treatment for this condition is not known. The HI-PEITHO study will compare two treatment options that are both available on the market for the treatment of PE. Patients will be randomized 1:1 to receive either blood thinners (anticoagulation) or blood thinners (anticoagulation) in combination with a device called the EkoSonicTM Endovascular device to dissolve blood clots. Patients will be followed for 12 months after randomization and have assessments while in the hospital as well as at 7 days, 30 days, 6 months and 12 months after randomization. The study will try to find out if one of these treatments is better than the other at reducing the risk of death and other serious problems.
The investigators expect to enroll about 80-100 acute pulmonary embolism patients treated with thrombolysis in two hospitals. Dynamic changes of cardiopulmonary function after thrombolysis are detected to evaluate which indicators can quickly reflect the effectiveness of thrombolysis.
Thromboprophylaxis for liver surgery can be commenced either preoperatively or postoperatively. Despite a clear trade-off between thrombosis and bleeding in liver surgery patients, there is no international consensus when thrombosis prophylaxis should be commenced in patients undergoing liver surgery. As far as we know, there are no prospective randomized trials in this field, and current guidelines are unfortunately based on very low quality evidence, that is, a few retrospective studies and expert opinion. Both American and European thromboprophylaxis guidelines for abdominal cancer surgery support the preoperative initiation of thromboprophylaxis, but these guidelines do not specifically address the increased bleeding risk associated with liver surgery. On the contrary, Dutch guidelines recommend postoperative thromboprophylaxis only, because of lack of evidence for preoperative thromboprophylaxis. Traditionally, many liver surgery units have been reluctant in using preoperative thromboprophylaxis due to the potentially increased risk of bleeding complications. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society Guidelines recommend preoperative thromboprophylaxis in liver surgery, but the guidelines provide no supporting evidence for this recommendation. Overall, the amount of evidence is scarce and somewhat contradictory in this clinically relevant field of thromboprophylaxis in liver surgery. The aim of this study is to compare pre- and postoperatively initiated thromboprophylaxis regimens in liver surgery in a randomized controlled trial.