View clinical trials related to Dry Eye.
Filter by:This study was designed to compare patient acceptance, comfort, and preference between two meibomian gland clearing devices (Lipiflow vs, iLux). Primary Objective was to compare patient comfort as assessed by Likert-style scale questionnaire following each bilateral procedure. Secondary Objective was to compare overall experience and treatment preference as assessed by Likert-style questionnaire following each bilateral procedure. Both devices are exempt from IDE regulations [21 CFR 812.2(c)].
The objective of the study is to evaluate the effectiveness of laughter therapy in relieving the symptoms of dry eye disease.
Drug delivery platforms are an innovative exciting advancement in ophthalmology. They allow patients to eliminate topical medications which are generally associated with lack of compliance, difficulty of use and requiring help from family members. These delivery systems can be applied easily in office, and patients do not have to worry about drop insertion in their post-operative regimen. The results of this research project should help to answer the following question: Does the use of a physician administered intracanalicular dexamethasone insert improve the signs and symptoms of ocular allergy and dry eye disease in KC patients compared to the use of topical loteprednol etabonate ophthalmic gel 0.38%?
The study was planned to be conducted in 2 parts: Part 1 to determine the efficacy and safety of ECF843 vs vehicle, followed by Part 2 with additional exploratory assessments of ECF843 vs Vehicle. Both parts of the study included a double-masked study design, with randomization stratified for subjects with Sjogren's Syndrome.
Resono Ophthalmic has developed Rexo-Eye in 2014, a QMR-based patented instrument which is hypothesised to stimulate physiological cellular regeneration and reactivate the tear system by stimulating and reactivating the lacrimal system, induce mild hyperthermia and massage effects which reactivate the tear and lipid secretion, targeting all arms of pathogenic mechanisms of dry eye disease. By improving cell migration and cell health, eye surface epithelial problems in dry eyes which are hard to reverse could hopefully be improved. It has been marked since 2016 as a medical device for the treatment of ocular surface disorders and patented in Italy and Europe, with other international patents pending. In this study, we aim to assess the efficacy and safety of Rexon-Eye in dry eye patients.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of treatments for Meibomian Gland Dysfunction.
The investigational device is an approved biometry device to perform biometric measurements preoperatively to calculate the needed IOL power. First, two native measurements at the IOL Master will be performed. Thereafter randomly assigned artificial tears are instilled in the eye and biometry will be repeated within 30 seconds, as well as after 2 and 5 minutes. At least 24hours after those measurements, two native measurements at the IOL Master will be performed. Thereafter, the not yet used artificial tears are instilled in the eye and biometry will be repeated within 30 seconds, as well as after 2 and 5 minutes. Examinations will be implemented in accordance with the approved investigational plan on subjects and includes: repeated biometry without and with artificial tear drops.
In patients with moderate to severe dry eye syndrome, the test drug (HA 0.15% eye drop) or the control drug (cyclosporin 0.05% eye drop) is administered for 12 weeks, and the corneal staining of each group would be evaluated. The study objective is to demonstrate that the test drug is not clinically inferior to the control drug. Furthermore, the efficacy of combination therapy would be evaluated through exploratory combination therapy group.
Dry eye disease is a very frequent pathology that importantly affects the quality of life of patients; in spite of the common use of eye lubricants to ameliorate symptoms, there is still a large number of patients who do not present improvement of the disease or they worsen. Although its etiology is varied, the imbalance of the immune system plays a substantial role in the development of dry eye disease. Rapamycin or sirolimus is an anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory drug that has an enormous potential in ocular surface pathologies such as dry eye disease. The aim of the present study is to determine the effectiveness and security of subconjunctival application of a new formulated drug of liposomal sirolimus in patients with moderate and severe dry eye disease. This is a randomized placebo-controlled double blind clinical trial. Patients presenting data of moderate or severe dry eye disease will be randomized into two groups. One group will receive additional to the conventional treatment, subconjunctival injections of liposomal sirolimus; meanwhile the other group will receive subconjunctival placebo injections. After intervention the effectiveness and the security of the liposomal sirolimus will be evaluated.
Study design: Phase I-II clinical trial, comparative, non-inferiority with active control, parallel groups, double blind with randomisation. Safety analysis when completing the visits of the first 12 subjects of the Nanodrop® group, if there are less than 20% of unexpected Events (EA), related to the research product, recruitment is continued until the sample is completed for efficacy analysis objectives Security: Evaluate the safety of the ophthalmic application of Nanodrop® by quantifying the incidence of unexpected Adverse Events (EA) related to the research product (PI). Effectiveness: Demonstrate the non-inferiority of Nanodrop® compared to Systane® Balance, in the efficacy of the treatment of patients with dry eye, by means of the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI). Hypothesis Security: H0 = Nanodrop® is safe in its ophthalmic application as it presents an incidence of unexpected adverse events related to the research drug, less than 20% of the population of Nanodrop® safety group. H1 = Nanodrop® is not safe in its ophthalmic application, as it presents an incidence of unexpected adverse events related to the research drug, exceeding 20% of the population of Nanodrop® safety group. Effectiveness: H0 = Nanodrop® is lower than Systane® Balance by more than 5 points in the OSDI test score. H1 = Nanodrop® is lower than Systane® Balance by 5 points or less in the OSDI test score. Number of subjects: n = 126 evaluable subjects 63 evaluable subjects per group (both eyes). Main inclusion criteria: Dry eye diagnosis Duration of intervention treatment: 28 days Approximate duration of the subject in the study: 35 days