Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Withdrawn

Administrative data

NCT number NCT03396809
Other study ID # MOD00006043
Secondary ID
Status Withdrawn
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date July 26, 2017
Est. completion date December 7, 2018

Study information

Verified date March 2024
Source University of New Mexico
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Purpose: Intravitreal injection of medications has revolutionized the treatment microvascular diseases. These diseases often require regular, life-long injections. Ensuring patient comfort is important for compliance with long-term treatments. Patients receiving regular intravitreal injections often complain of progressive dry eye related discomfort. These symptoms are likely secondary to the use of povidone iodine as an antiseptic. Investigators hypothesize that punctal plugs could reverse the progressive ocular surface discomfort induced by povidone iodine during the post-procedural state.


Description:

Retina specialists treat many diseases of the posterior segment of the eye by the delivery of medications via intravitreal injections. Many of these medications are monoclonal antibodies that need to be injected monthly. Endophthalmitis is a sight threatening complication of intravitreal injections. Limiting this complication is of primary importance in any injection protocol. The gold standard antiseptic used in intravitreal injection is Povidone-iodine (PI). PI is used to clean the surrounding ocular adnexa and is used in a 5% dilution on the ocular surface. PI has been shown to be corrosive to the cornea, delay healing, and cause patients significant discomfort post injection especially for those with dry eye. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatories, topical anesthetics, and anticholinergics have been shown to decrease post injection discomfort1, but these measures are expensive, do not protect against corneal irritation and do not improve the healing capacity of the eye. There is a need for a cost effective measure that can reduce corneal irritation and improve healing due to the effects of PI. Punctal plugs are FDA approved for the treatment of dry eye. They increase lubrication of the eye by blocking the drainage of tears into the lacrimal sac. Our study would like to investigate the efficacy of punctal plug insertion in the prevention of dry eye symptoms caused by PI following intravitreal injection. It has been shown that PI is toxic to the cornea at increasing concentrations. Once in contact with corneal epithelium it releases free iodine radicals causing cytotoxicity and apoptosis of cells. This makes it an effective antiseptic for Ophthalmologic procedures, but also causes significant destruction of the healthy corneal tissue2. It has also been shown in rabbits that calf serum is protective against PI induced corneal damage by providing an additional organic substrate for the PI to bind3. It is possible that natural tears can have a similar effect. Punctal plugs are an extremely cost effective and widely used device to increase the volume of tears on the ocular surface. They block the lacrimal puncta and canalicular system that drains into the nasolacrimal duct, thereby inhibiting drainage of the natural tears into the nasal atria. In patients with dry eye who receive intravitreal injection punctal plugs may be useful in reducing corneal irritation by increasing the volume of natural tears on the ocular surface, which provides an additional organic substrate for the PI solution to bind. This has the potential to decrease the corrosive effects of the PI on the cornea, reduce healing time, and reduce pain in patients with dry eye. Investigators will be performing a case crossover study. First patients who consent will be asked to complete an Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI). Those whose score indicates a diagnosis of dry eye will eligible for the study. Three to five days after their intravitreal injection, patients will be contacted over the telephone and asked to complete the OSDI. At their next visit, one month later, a punctal plug will be inserted before their second injection. Three to five days after their second injection, they will be asked to complete the OSDI over the telephone. At their third visit they will receive an intravitreal injection and three to five days after they will be asked to complete a final OSDI. If patients are receiving bilateral intravitreal injections, and the OSDI survey indicates dry eyes bilaterally, then only one of the eyes will be randomly chosen for plug insertion. The other eye will then be used as a control. There will be no blinding.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Withdrawn
Enrollment 0
Est. completion date December 7, 2018
Est. primary completion date July 7, 2018
Accepts healthy volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Gender All
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - Patients seen at Eye Associates of New Mexico Retina Center or the University of New Mexico Eye Clinic - Three consecutive monthly intravitreal injections - Patients whose OSDI score indicate dry eye (score greater than 12) - Greater than 18 years old - Males and Females Exclusion Criteria: - previous punctal plugs - punctal cautery - active infection - history of ocular infection 1. herpes simplex virus 2. herpes zoster virus - previous eyelid trauma 1. surgery 2. graft versus host disease 3. and thyroid eye disease - Women whom are pregnant or may become pregnant

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Device:
Punctal plug
Punctal plugs are FDA approved for the treatment of dry eye. They increase lubrication of the eye by blocking the drainage of tears into the lacrimal sac. The nose portion of the plug has a larger diameter which is designed to fit in the canaliculum in order to retain the plug in the punctum. The plugs will be used on-label, as it is FDA approved in the treatment of dry eye. The purpose of punctal plugs are to increase tear volume by preventing drainage of tears into the lacrimal sac. The plugs are removable if necessary. Investigators are not testing this device for effectiveness or safety.

Locations

Country Name City State
United States Eye Associates of New Mexico Retina Center Albuquerque New Mexico

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
University of New Mexico

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

References & Publications (5)

Georgakopoulos CD, Tsapardoni F, Makri OE. EFFECT OF BROMFENAC ON PAIN RELATED TO INTRAVITREAL INJECTIONS: A Randomized Crossover Study. Retina. 2017 Feb;37(2):388-395. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000001137. — View Citation

Haddock LJ, Ramsey DJ, Young LH. Complications of subspecialty ophthalmic care: endophthalmitis after intravitreal injections of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor medications. Semin Ophthalmol. 2014 Sep-Nov;29(5-6):257-62. doi: 10.3109/08820538.2014 — View Citation

Jehangir N, Bever G, Mahmood SM, Moshirfar M. Comprehensive Review of the Literature on Existing Punctal Plugs for the Management of Dry Eye Disease. J Ophthalmol. 2016;2016:9312340. doi: 10.1155/2016/9312340. Epub 2016 Mar 7. — View Citation

Jiang J, Wu M, Shen T. The toxic effect of different concentrations of povidone iodine on the rabbit's cornea. Cutan Ocul Toxicol. 2009;28(3):119-24. doi: 10.1080/15569520903080511. — View Citation

Naor J, Savion N, Blumenthal M, Assia EI. Corneal endothelial cytotoxicity of diluted povidone--iodine. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001 Jun;27(6):941-7. doi: 10.1016/s0886-3350(00)00750-1. — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Reduction in OSDI scores For primary endpoints, investigators expect that participants will report reduced OSDI scores after intravitreal injection after insertion of punctal plug.
The Ocular Surface Disease Index, or OSDI, is a series of 12 questions associated with a scale that assesses dry eye disease. It has three subsections that investigate the symptoms, environmental factors, and functional limitations caused by dry eye. Each question has a 5 category Likert scale associated with it with five response options that range from "none of the time" to "all of the time." The final score is calculated by multiplying the sum of the scores by 25 and dividing by the total number of questions answered. A response between 0 and 12 represents normal, 13-22 mild, 23-32 moderate, and greater than 33 severe dry eye disease. The scores range from 0-100. The OSDI scores will be conducted by Elisabeth Sledz, in person after consent and over the telephone thereafter.
1 year
Secondary OSDI scores in patients receiving bilateral injections Patients receiving bilateral injections will be analyzed in a subgroup. Only one of their eyes will receive a punctal plug and the other will be used as a control. OSDI scores will be completed for both eyes.
The Ocular Surface Disease Index, or OSDI, is a series of 12 questions associated with a scale that assesses dry eye disease. It has three subsections that investigate the symptoms, environmental factors, and functional limitations caused by dry eye. Each question has a 5 category Likert scale associated with it with five response options that range from "none of the time" to "all of the time." The final score is calculated by multiplying the sum of the scores by 25 and dividing by the total number of questions answered. A response between 0 and 12 represents normal, 13-22 mild, 23-32 moderate, and greater than 33 sever dry eye disease. The scores range from 0-100. The OSDI scores will be conducted by Elisabeth Sledz, in person after consent and over the telephone.
1 year
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Active, not recruiting NCT04425551 - Effect of Micropulse Laser on Dry Eye Disease Due to Meibomian Gland Dysfunction N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT06379685 - Study to Evaluate the Safety and Tolerability of PRO-190 Ophthalmic Solution Compared to Systane Ultra® on the Ocular Surface. Phase 1
Recruiting NCT04701086 - 3 Month Study of Cationorm Pro Versus Vismed in Adults With Dry Eye Disease Related to Keratitis or Keratoconjunctivitis N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT03697876 - Safety and Tolerability of the Ophthalmic Gel PRO-165 Versus Artelac® Nightime Gel Phase 1
Terminated NCT02815293 - Topical Ophthalmic AGN-195263 for the Treatment of Evaporative Dry Eye Phase 3
Completed NCT02910713 - Evaluation of Dry Eye Symptoms in CAE With Application of Intranasal Neurostimulation N/A
Completed NCT04104997 - A Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability and Pharmacokinetic Characteristics of GLH8NDE After Single and Mutiple Ocular Administrations in Healthy Korean and Caucasian Volunteers Phase 1
Recruiting NCT02595606 - 0.3% Sodium Hyaluronate in the Treatment of Dry Eye of Diabetic Patients Phase 4
Completed NCT01711424 - An Observational Study of OPTIVE PLUS® for the Treatment of Dry Eye Disease N/A
Completed NCT01015209 - Safety and Tolerability of Chitosan-N-acetylcysteine Eye Drops in Healthy Young Volunteers Phase 1
Completed NCT01202747 - Evaluation of Screening Methods for Treatment of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction Phase 2/Phase 3
Completed NCT00969280 - Acupuncture for Dry Eye Syndrome Phase 3
Completed NCT00756678 - Efficacy and Acceptability of Two Lubricant Eye Drops Phase 4
Completed NCT00739713 - Effects of Sea Buckthorn Oil on Dry Eye N/A
Completed NCT01496482 - Comparison of Evaporimetry With the Established Methods of Tear Film Measurement N/A
Completed NCT00349440 - Efficacy of Cyclosporine for the Prevention and Treatment of Dry Eye Symptoms Following LASIK or Photorefractive Keratectomy Phase 4
Completed NCT00370747 - Efficacy and Safety Study for Ecabet Ophthalmic Solution for Treating Dry Eye Syndrome Phase 2
Completed NCT05162261 - to Evaluate the Effectiveness and Safety of the Tixel® , VS LipiFlow® in the Treatment of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction N/A
Completed NCT02871440 - A Two Comparator, Controlled Phase 3 Study in Patients With and Without Evaporative Dry Eye Phase 3
Completed NCT05042960 - Computer Screen Properties Study N/A