Clinical Trials Logo

Diverticulum clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Diverticulum.

Filter by:

NCT ID: NCT01627262 Completed - Clinical trials for Colonic Diverticulosis

Mesalamine for Uncomplicated Diverticular Disease: a Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study

Start date: May 2002
Phase: Phase 2
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of this study is to determine whether mesalamine is effective in the treatment of uncomplicated diverticular disease by reducing the pain.

NCT ID: NCT01626963 Recruiting - Colorectal Cancer Clinical Trials

Single-port Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery

Start date: January 2014
Phase: Phase 1/Phase 2
Study type: Interventional

Conventional multi-port laparoscopic surgery (CL) is now a standard approach to colorectal resections, due to it's short-term benefits over conventional open surgery. In recent years, several studies have demonstrated that - in suitable patients - single-port access surgery (SPA) has similar clinical outcome compared to CL, with additional cosmetic benefits. It remains, however, unclear whether the trauma of surgery is also less for SPA compared to CL. In this study, the investigators aim to randomise patients who are deemed suitable for SPA surgery to either SPA approach, or CL; in addition to clinical outcomes including length of operating time, post-operative pain scores, complications, quality of life indicators and cosmetic appearance, the investigators aim to compare the physiological response to trauma through biochemical markers (including C-reactive protein, White Blood Cell count) and cytokine expression (i.e. Interleukins IL-6 and IL-8). Patients will be analysed according to intention-to-treat analysis, with 25 patients in the SPA and 25 patients in the CL group. The patients will be operated by surgeons proficient in both CL and SPA surgery, and followed-up for the duration of their hospitalisation as well as at their routine out-patient visits, using questionnaires.

NCT ID: NCT01552226 Active, not recruiting - Rectal Cancer Clinical Trials

Compare Preperitoneal Analgesia to Epidural Analgesia for Pain Control After Colon and Rectal Surgery

Start date: January 2010
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

This is a prospective randomized study of 114 patients. The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of two standard methods of analgesia for pain control in patients undergoing elective colon and rectal surgery, as measured by the Numeric Pain Scale (NPS) and by the need for supplemental narcotic analgesics. This study is designed to determine if postoperative pain control by local analgesics delivered through preperitoneally placed ON-Q Silver SoakerTM catheters (CPA) is equivalent to continuous epidural analgesia (CEA).

NCT ID: NCT01534754 Completed - Clinical trials for Diverticular Disease of the Colon

Mesalazine and/or Lactobacillus Casei in the Diverticular Disease of the Colon

Start date: January 2009
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

This is a multi-centre, randomised, double blind, double-dummy, parallel groups, placebo-controlled trial was conducted in a population of patients suffering from symptomatic uncomplicated diverticular disease in order to investigate which is the best treatment in preventing relapses of the disease. Patients were randomly divided in double-blind fashion in one of the following groups: Group A. Active mesalazine 800 mg, 2 tablets/day for 10 days/month plus Lactobacillus casei placebo, 1 sachet/day for 10 days/month; Group B. Active Lactobacillus casei, 1 sachet/day for 10 days/month plus mesalazine 800 placebo, 2 tablets/day for 10 days/month; Group C. Active mesalazine 800 ng, 2 tablets/day plus Active Lactobacillus casei, 1 sachet/day for 10 days/month; Group D. Mesalazine 800 mg placebo, 2 tablets/day and Lactobacillus casei placebo, 1 sachet/day for 10 days/month. The main objective was to assess the safety and the efficacy of mesalazine and/or Lactobacillus casei in maintaining remission of symptomatic uncomplicated diverticular disease

NCT ID: NCT01522573 Recruiting - Pancreatic Cancer Clinical Trials

T-EUS for Gastrointestinal Disorders: A Multicenter Registry

EUSERCPReg
Start date: November 2011
Phase: N/A
Study type: Observational

The purpose of this registry is to record information and evaluate the impact of Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS) Guided Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) on the management of pancreatico-biliary disorders. The registry will evaluate efficacy, safety and technical success of the Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS)Guided Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) procedures. The safety and efficacy of various EUS-Guided ERCP procedures have been assessed in a series of studies. This multi-center registry has been initiated: - To document the impact of EUS-Guided ERCP procedures on the management of pancreatico-biliary disorders including malignancies. - To assess the clinical and technical success rates of EUS-Guided ERCPs for diagnostic or therapeutic procedures. Design is retrospective and prospective registry study. Procedures that will be captured include: 1. EUS-Coils placement 2. EUS Glue injection 3. EUS-Fiducial placement 4. EUS-Neurolysis 5. EUS-Stent placement 6. EUS-alcohol injection 7. EUS-fluid collection, abscess or cavity drainage 8. EUS guided ductal drainage 9. EUS-guided Ablation 10. EUS-guided anastomosis 11. EUS Guided ERCP for gallbladder, pancreatic duct or biliary duct drainage

NCT ID: NCT01493349 Not yet recruiting - Diverticulitis Clinical Trials

Pathophysiology of Diverticular Disease

Start date: January 2012
Phase: N/A
Study type: Observational

Colonic diverticular disease is a highly prevalent condition in Western populations. The prevalence increases age-dependently from 5% at 40 years to 65% by the age of 85 years (1-3). The majority remain asymptomatic. However, a significant proportion of the patient population develops complications, such as diverticulitis with or without symptoms (10-20%) (1, 4-10). Perforated diverticulitis is rare with an estimated incidence of 4 per 100.000 per year, but the associated mortality rate is 22% to 39% (9, 11, 12). In the United States, the complications related to diverticular disease account for 130.000 hospitalizations each year, resulting in substantial health care costs (13). In Europe, it is estimated that approximately 23.600 deaths per year can be attributed to complicated diverticular disease, and the mortality will probably increase in the future due to the aging population (15-17). Several case studies report an overall increase in the incidence of diverticulitis, based on the increase in hospitalizations (18). Kang et al, reported a 16% increased male admission rate and 12% female admission rate for diverticulitis, between 1989/1990 and 1999/2000 (19). Aging and the Western diet, low in fiber and high in fat, in combination with increased intraluminal pressure and alterations in colonic motility are considered important etiological factors. A disturbance in large bowel motility is suggested to be a common pathophysiological feature in IBS and diverticular disease (20, 21). Based on observations that IBD, subgroups of IBS and (symptomatic) diverticular disease share clinical symptoms, the hypothesis is derived that they might also share pathophysiological factors like low grade inflammation, changed microbiota composition and activity, and increased intestinal permeability. The identification of clinical and pathophysiological factors associated with an increased risk for complicated diverticular disease may help to identify patients with diverticular disease, prevent complications, develop strategies to improve quality of life and reduce the related health care costs. Therefore we aim to investigate the composition of luminal and mucosal intestinal microbiota and the intestinal permeability in the development of diverticular disease and complicated diverticular disease. We hypothesize that both the intestinal microbiota and intestinal permeability are altered in patients with (current- or previous history of complicated) diverticular disease.

NCT ID: NCT01488045 Completed - Rectal Cancer Clinical Trials

Compare Propofol to Fentanyl and Midazolam for Colonoscopy

Start date: June 2011
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The study aim is to determine if Propofol or the combination of Fentanyl and low-dose Midazolam, are equivalent for patient satisfaction and discomfort when undergoing a colonoscopy. This is a prospective randomized study of 262. The primary outcome of this study is participant's satisfaction and discomfort of the colonoscopy procedure as perceived by the participant, and the secondary outcome will be the discomfort of the patient and difficulty of the procedure as perceived by the physician.

NCT ID: NCT01339273 Completed - Ulcerative Colitis Clinical Trials

Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) Block for Postoperative Analgesia After Laparoscopic Colonic Resection

Start date: September 2011
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Laparoscopic (key-hole) large bowel resection is a minimally invasive procedure when compared to open large bowel resection, but is still associated with a significant amount of pain and discomfort. Analgesia is commonly provided by a multi-modal technique involving varying combinations of paracetamol, Non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), regional analgesia and oral or parenteral opioids. While epidural analgesia is considered the gold standard for open colo-rectal procedures it can be associated with significant complications and may delay hospital discharge in laparoscopic procedures. Opioids are associated with an increased incidence of nausea, vomiting and sedation and reduced bowel motility which can also prolong recovery. Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) block is a technique which numbs the nerves carrying pain sensation from the abdominal wall and provides effective and safe analgesia with minimal systemic side effects. Their perceived benefits are thought to relate to reduced opioid consumption and therefore reduced opioid side effects. The investigators believe ultrasound guided TAP blocks will reduce pain and morphine consumption with a resultant improved patient satisfaction, earlier return of bowel function and earlier hospital discharge. The key research question the investigators are trying to answer is whether TAP block provide better pain relief than local anaesthetic infiltration of the laparoscopic port sites. Both techniques are currently being used in our hospital and a retrospective audit demonstrated better analgesia and lower consumption of morphine in the TAP block group.The differences were not statistically significant as the number patients in the audit were not large enough.The investigators are hoping that this study will demonstrate that the difference is real by recruiting the necessary number of patients into each group (36 per group)

NCT ID: NCT01326052 Completed - Clinical trials for Defecatory Disorders After Left Colonic or Rectal Resection

Improvement of Anorectal Function While Preserving of Inferior Mesenteric Artery Performing Left Hemicolectomy for Diverticulosis

IPIMAL
Start date: January 2004
Phase: Phase 3
Study type: Interventional

The aim of the study is to evaluate the anorectal function after hemicolectomy if we preserve or not the Inferior Mesenteric Artery (IMA). This study wants to demonstrate that IMA preservation could improve patient's quality of life reducing incontinence and/or constipation rate.

NCT ID: NCT01301417 Completed - Lymphoma Clinical Trials

Data Collection of Patients Treated With the ColonRing™ for the Creation of Circular Compression Anastomosis

RETROPRESS
Start date: February 2011
Phase: N/A
Study type: Observational

The proposed study is a post marketing, observational, retrospective data collection intended to gather and record data on patients treated with the ColonRing™ device in routine clinical practice at a single center. The data will assist in further evaluating the performance of the ColonRing™ device in regards to the creation of a colorectal anastomosis. Hypothesis:The performance of the ColonRing™, determined by the rate of complications, will be within the acceptable range reported in the literature for alternative treatment modalities.