View clinical trials related to Diabetic Foot.
Filter by:This is a prospective trial designed to evaluate the use of Meso Wound Matrix (DSM Biomedical, Exton, PA) in Wagner grade 1 and 2 DFUs.
Type 1 and Type 2 diabetic patients with diabetic foot ulcer will be recruited and screened for participation in the study. Eligible patients will be randomized 1:1 to either experimental or control group and undergo 10-weeks of treatment (as an addition to standard care) and 4 weeks of follow-up to evaluate the effect of chitosan gel on chronic wound (diabetic foot ulcer) healing.
It is hypothesized that application at 4-week or greater intervals of the human placental umbilical cord tissue TTAX01 to the surface of a well debrided, complex diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) will, with concomitant management of infection, will result in a higher rate of wounds showing complete healing within 26 weeks of initiating therapy, compared with standard care alone. This confirmatory Phase 3 study examines a population of diabetic foot ulcer patients having adequate perfusion, with or without neuropathy, and a high suspicion of associated osteomyelitis in a complex, high grade wound.
Determining whether the utilization of Noraxon myoRESEARCH Software gait analysis Evaluation and orthotic gait Correction can reduce diabetic foot ulceration Or subsequent amputation in patients with a history of a diabetic foot ulceration.
Lower extremity complications such as chronic diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) are a major risk for Type I/II diabetes patients. Minor injuries that would normally heal without consequence in non-diabetic individuals are at greater risk of bacterial infection and progression to non healing (chronic) wound status in diabetics, largely due to a loss of sensation in limbs (neuropathy) and decreased blood flow (vascular disease). If not treated efficiently and effectively, DFUs can have serious complications e.g. amputation, sepsis and death. The investigators propose to address this significant unmet clinical need using a novel commercial handheld fluorescence imaging product called the MolecuLight i:X (MolecuLight Inc.) which images clinically-significant wound bacteria without contrast agents or patient contact. Evidence in animal models of chronic wounds and multiple published clinical trials (mainly DFUs) have shown significant clinical potential for fluorescence imaging to detect potentially harmful bacteria in wounds otherwise invisible to doctors. The investigators have shown that clinicians can easily, objectively and more accurately determine the likelihood of bacterial infection than the standard of care. Moreover, published clinical evidence has shown fluorescence imaging enables more accurate microbial wound sampling and guides more targeted debridement of wounds to reduce bacteria levels. Our pilot data also show that when used like this, the i:X device accelerates DFU wound healing, compared with current methods. Thus, the investigators propose to expand the current pilot studies through a statistically-powered 3 y randomized controlled trial to test the therapeutic benefit of fluorescence-guided treatment for DFUs in a larger group of patients. A successful trial could help reduce DFU healing times compared with standard practice (using a new Canadian product) and improve patient quality of life, reduce amputation risk and alleviate health care costs for diabetes complications in Canada and beyond.
Patients with diabetes, hammer, mallet and claw toes and impending ulcers associated with hammer mallet and claw toes will be randomized to tenotomy (cutting) of flexor tendons to the afflicted toes, done by needle and standard offloading or offloading alone. Impending ulcers are defined as callus or nail changes that are known pre-stages to ulcers. The effects of the surgery on incidence of ulcers associated with the named deformities, and rate of complications associated with the surgery.
1. Aim Patients with diabetes, hammer, mallet and claw toes and ulcers associated with the named deformities will be randomized to tenotomy (cutting) of flexor tendons to the afflicted toes, done by needle and standard offloading or offloading alone. The effects of the surgery on time to healing of ulcers associated with the named deformities, recurrence of the ulcers, and rate of complications associated with the surgery. In addition to this all patients gait and balance will be examined before start of the study, and after 3 months, to se if there is an effect of the surgery on patients gait and balance. 2. Method A prospective randomized clinical study, which means a study were patients will be allocated randomly to surgery and standard care or standard care alone. Patients will attend a total of up to 14 visits over a 12-month period. 3.
Diabetic foot is defined by World Health Organization as a syndrome in which the presence of neuropathy, ischemia and infection cause tissue damage or ulcers from minor trauma. This condition can be controlled in its early stages with conservative treatment, which is effective in preventing infections and amputations. However, even with the new knowledge acquired and the development of new therapies, the specialist often faces wounds that do not improve despite the proper treatment, so therapies have been sought to help the healing of these Ulcers. Growing evidence suggests that healing of chronic diabetic foot ulcers depends on growth factors and that the therapeutic use of these in wounds has the potential to accelerate their healing in conjunction with wound care Conventional. This study evaluates the effect of plasma rich in autologous growth factors on healing chronic ulcers of diabetic origin. This is a randomized clinical trial that evaluates two study groups. Control group in which advanced weekly healing will be performed while the post-advanced healing study group will be performed the intradermal application of plasma rich in growth factors. These manoeuvres will be performed once a week for four weeks and at the end of the study the results in both groups will be checked. Both groups will also evaluate, frequency and intensity of pain, quality of life, histological changes in ulcers and metabolic evaluation
Patients who are admitted to hospital with serious infections, such as those in bone, joints or spine, require a long course of intravenous (IV) antibiotics. After an initial treatment course in hospital or through a dedicated outpatient antibiotic program many patients can complete their treatment course at home. Such infections are often caused by bacteria called Staphylococci, and currently there are three antibiotic options used routinely. A fourth antibiotic, ceftriaxone, is a promising alternative; it is also effective against Staphylococci, and is more convenient, less costly and easier to give at home, however, it has not been studied thoroughly in a prospective manner. This study will compare ceftriaxone to routinely used antibiotics (cloxacillin, cefazolin or daptomycin) to see if ceftriaxone is equally as safe and efficacious in curing deep-seated Staphylococcal infections in patients receiving home IV antibiotics. Patients with deep-seated infections caused by methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) or coagulase-negative Staphylococcal species will be randomly assigned home IV treatment with ceftriaxone OR one of the three other antibiotics before leaving the hospital. Patients will then receive usual care from an Infectious Disease physician and Home IV team. The study team will assess whether cure has been achieved by the end of the IV treatment, follow-up at 6 months to see if patients remain infection-free, and record any side-effects of treatment. The overall goal is to determine whether ceftriaxone can be considered non-inferior to usual antibiotic treatment in treating Staphylococcal infections in a home IV setting.
Some people with diabetes get foot ulcers that do not heal. These ulcers can get infected and cause other medical problems. Five patients with these foot ulcers volunteered to participate in the first part of this study (C9T12015, NCT02657876). They are called Cohort 1 in this registration. Cohort 1 received one application (piece) of an experimental skin tissue to make sure it was safe. This study will extend the safety test of the experimental skin tissue. It will find out if it is safe to use more than once to cover non-healing ulcers. This extension will include two more groups, Cohort 2 and Cohort 3. Cohort 2 may get up to 5 applications. Cohort 3 may get up to 10 applications. The number of applications will depend on how well the wound is healing. Participants will be in the study up to one year.