View clinical trials related to Critical Illness.
Filter by:Physical restraints (PR) are widely used in ICU around the world. Many institutions have suggested that the use of PR should be reduced. Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) are a convenient way of packaging evidence and presenting recommendations to healthcare decision makers. There are currently no CPGs on PR in China, while other countries had, so we hope to be able to adapt existing guidelines to apply in Chinese context. We use the CAN-IMPLEMENT approach to adapt and implement the guidelines.
This is a registry-based cohort study of all adult patients (≥18 years) admitted to Swedish Intensive Care Units with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 disease during the first 2 months of the 2020 pandemic. The main goal is to describe demographic characteristics, coexisting conditions, treatments and outcomes among critically ill patients with COVID-19. A secondary goal is to identify independent risk factors associated with increased mortality for these patients. Data regarding baseline characteristics including comorbidities, intensive care treatments and outcomes will be extracted. ICU lengths of stay and 30-day mortalities will be calculated. The primary outcome is 30-day all-cause mortality. THIS PART OF THE STUDY HAS BEEN COMPLETED. UPDATE 26 Feb 2022: Characteristics and outcomes of 'first wave' patients admitted to Swedish ICUs was published in Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2021 Apr 1;38(4):335-343. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001459. A description of the surge response and aggregated data outcomes in Scandinavian countries was published in https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aas.13983. ADDITIONAL SUMMARY - EXTENDED INCLUSION PERIOD AND ADDITION OF LONG-TERM OUTCOMES Due to the continued influx of patients requiring intensive care throughout 2020 and 2021, we extended the inclusion period to 30 June 2021. Thus this new cohort will include all patients admitted to ICUs in Sweden from 6 March 2020 to 30 June 2021. We will investigate short (30day mortality) and long-term outcomes (365d mortality and cardiovascular complications) of patients admitted to Swedish ICUs with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 disease.
Swallow disorders or dysphagia related to mechanical ventilation affects between 1,300 and 2,000 patients in Danish intensive care units every year and increases aspiration, pneumonia and risk of dying. In intensive care units, dysphagia may vary around the clock as fatigue and fluctuating alertness play an important role for the patients' ability to swallow effectively without aspiration to the airway. For this reason, ICU nurses must be able to assess dysphagia in the ICU patient day and night, but guidelines are lacking. One of the simplest and most sensitive methods is the Yale Swallow Protocol, however, this protocol requires translation and validation before it can be implemented in Danish intensive care units. This project aims to translate and validate the Yale Swallow Protocol for use in Danish intensive care units. Furthermore, this project will explore nurses' perceptions and management of dysphagia in the intensive care unit as well as feasibility and acceptability of the Yale Swallow Protocol.
The investigators hypothesize that those with respiratory failure due to COVID-19 will have different burdens of mental and physical disability than those with respiratory failure who do not have COVID-19. Detecting these potential differences will lay an important foundation for treating long term sequelae of respiratory failure in these two cohorts.
The Risk stratification in COVID-19 patients in the ICU (RISC-19-ICU) registry was founded during the emerging SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. COVID-19 is a novel disease caused by infection with the SARS-CoV-2 virus that was first described in December 2019. The disease has spread exponentially in many countries and has reached global pandemic status within three months. According to first experience, hospitalization was required in approximately 20 % of cases and severe, life-threatening illness resulted in approximately 10 %. In some countries, health care systems were overwhelmed by the rapid increase in critically ill patients that far exceeded their capacity. It is thus of utmost importance to gain knowledge about the characteristics and course of critically ill patients with COVID-19 and to stratify these patients according to their risk for further deterioration. A key part of fighting this pandemic is to exchange scientific information and advance our understanding of the disease. The Risk stratification in COVID-19 patients in the ICU (RISC-19-ICU) registry aims to collect an anonymized dataset to characterize patients that develop life-threatening critical illness due to COVID-19 and make it accessible to collaborative analysis. The data collected may be composed of a core dataset and/or an extended dataset. The core dataset consists of a basic set of parameters, of which many are commonly generated during treatment of critically ill patients with COVID-19 in an intensive care unit (the individual parameters are marked yellow in the attached case report forms, and are clearly marked on the electronic case report forms during data entry). The extended dataset consists of parameters that may be measured during treatment of critically ill patients with COVID-19 in an intensive care unit, depending on clinical practice, indication and availability of the measurement method. The data accumulating in the registry as the pandemic or subsequent waves develop are made available to the collaborators to support an optimal response to the pandemic threat. The information gained on the initial characteristics and disease course via the RISC-19-ICU registry may contribute to a better understanding of the risk factors for developing critical illness due to COVID-19 and for an unfavorable disease course, and thus support informed patient triage and management decisions. Initial research questions are (I) to perform risk stratification of critically ill patients with COVID-19 to find predictors associated with the development of critical illness due to COVID-19: characterization of the study population, which are critically ill patients with COVID-19: inflammation, oxygenation, circulatory function, among other parameters collected in the registry, and (II) to perform risk stratification of critically ill patients with COVID-19 to predict outcome after ICU admission (ICU mortality, ICU length of stay): characterization of patients grouped by disease course in the ICU, based on inflammation, oxygenation, circulatory function, and other parameters collected in the registry.
End-tidal CO2 measurements in children will be assessed for their accuracy with arterial CO2 measurements.
Healthcare associated infections linked to the use of indwelling medical devices increase hospital morbidity, mortality and the Intensive Care treatment costs. The essential strategy for mitigating these consequences are prompt source identifcation and control, with appropriate antimicrobial therapy initiation as soon as possible. Removing the source is one of the golden rule for infection control. Early identification of the responsible germs is the other major guiding element for the appropriate anti-infectious treatment. Despite multiple detection/identification methods, there are no clear recommendations for biofilm identification in clinical practice. The gold standard method is bacterial/fungal culturing, with disadvantages related to late results, especially for slow growing, fastidious germs or related to the existence of uncultivable strains. In order to obtain more sensitive, specific results and to increase the chances of better biofilm characterization, in the present study the investigators compare biofilm identification results obtained by standard cultivation methods with those by DNA amplification and next generation gene sequencing. The studied biofilm is associated to four criticallly ill oncological patients indwelling devices (endotracheal tube, central venous catheter, arterial catheter and urinary catheter).
Infection with SARS-CoV-2 or severe acute respiratory syndrome coronarvirus type 2 was highlighted in December 2019 in the city of Wuhan in China, responsible for an pandemic evolution since March 11, 2020. The infection affects all ages of life, although affecting children in a very small proportion of cases. The typical presentation of the disease combines fever (98%), cough (76%), myalgia and asthenia (18%) as well as leukopenia (25%) and lymphopenia (63%). Upper airway involvement rare. The main clinical presentation requiring hospitalization of infected patients is that of atypical pneumonia which may require critical care management (27%), and progress to an acute respiratory distress syndrome (67%) involving life-threatening conditions in almost 25% of patients diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Other organ damage have been reported, mainly concerning kidney damage (29%) which may require renal replacement therapy in approximately 17% of patients. Neurological damage has been very rarely studied, yet reported in 36% of cases in a study including patients of varying severity. Finally, the mortality associated with this emerging virus is high in patients for whom critical care management is necessary, reported in 62% of patients. We therefore propose a prospective observational study which aim at reporting the prevalence of acute encephalopathy at initial management in Critical/Intensive care or Neurocritical care , to report its morbidity and mortality and to identify prognostic factors.
There was an interaction between mortality, nutritional intake and the Nutrition Risk in Critically ill (NUTRIC) score suggesting that those with higher NUTRIC scores benefited the most from increasing nutritional intake. Yet limited data were in Chinese patients. The current outbreak of novel coronavirus, named COVID-19, was first reported from Wuhan, China on Dec ember 31 , 2019. There are about 16% patients need ICU admission. The objective of this study is to validation of the "NUTRIC" nutritional risk assessment tool in Chinese ICU patients diagnosed as COVID-19.
Evaluate the accuracy, in the diagnosis of critical illness myopathy and / or neuropathy, of the simplified peroneal nerve test performed by a neurophysiopathology technician or by a neurophysiopathology doctor (as the gold standard) compared to the exam performed by an intensivist.