There are about 6461 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in Russian Federation. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
This is a phase IIb, prospective, multi-country, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group study to investigate the efficacy, safety and transformation of NP following single intradiscal injection of STA363 (lactic acid) into one or two IVDs compared to placebo for the treatment of discogenic low back pain. This study will be conducted in Russia, Spain and the Netherlands.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of ustekinumab dosing in inducing clinical remission (Global) and in maintaining clinical remission (US); to evaluate the safety profile and ustekinumab exposure (pharmacokinetics [PK]) in pediatric participants with moderately to severely active Crohn's disease.
This is multicenter investigator-initiated randomized open-label phase II clinical trial to compare prophylaxis of graft versus host disease treated with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil versus ruxolitinib after post-transplant cyclophosphamide. In total 128 patients will be included in the study. After inclusion into the study and performing of transplantation patients will be randomized in 1:1 proportion in two arms (64 patients per arm): arm A will include patients who will be treated with cyclophosphamide and ruxolitinib for GVHD prophylaxis; arm B will include patients who will be treated with cyclophosphamide, tacrolimus and MMF for GVHD prophylaxis. After the end of the treatment patients will be followed-up during two years.
For the first time in Russia, it is planned to introduce and study primary knee arthroplasty using an active robotic system. The aim is to increase the efficiency of primary total knee arthroplasty using an active robotic surgical system. Traditional endoprosthetics of the knee joint (TKA) has now reached its maximum manufacturability and efficiency, but the accuracy of the performance depends on the skill and experience of the surgeon, as well as the efficiency of the cutting instrument (oscillator saw) when performing bone resection, the condition of the instrument and on the density of bone tissue fabric, which is highly variable. Modern RSS used in orthopedics include a robotic arm, robotic cutting devices with a computer navigation system, which are in active, semi-automatic or passive control mode. The main advantage of robotic systems is accurate preliminary planning using 3D modeling, use individual implant selection and virtual positioning.The active robotic surgical system TSolution-One allows participants to level the error in the positioning of the implant. The active robotic surgical system (ARSS) allows to correctly install the implant, which affects its service life, reduces the risks of postoperative complications, quickly returns to the usual way of life and forgets about the technical negative sensations and limitations that existed before the operation.It is planned to conduct an open-label retrospective and prospective clinical study in parallel observations.The study is planned to include 300 patients with osteoarthritis of the knee joint stage 3-4 (according to Kellgren-Lawrence). Investigators took three groups of patients, 100 patients each, and offered different options for total knee arthroplasty techniques.According to the research:-A clinical active robotic system for primary total knee arthroplasty will be introduced in Russia-There will be recommended indications and contraindications for this system in patients with gonarthrosis-The methodology of preoperative planning will be improved-The results of primary knee arthroplasty with an active robotic system will be evaluated in comparison with standard techniques and computer navigation-The methodology developed and improved in the dissertation will be introduced into the work of the clinical departments of traumatology, orthopedics and disaster surgery, studying the learning curve.
This is a study for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) or small lymphocytic leukemia (SLL) who have previously received treatment with at least a BTK inhibitor. The main purpose is to compare LOXO-305 to idelalisib plus rituximab or bendamustine plus rituximab. Participation could last up to four years, and possibly longer, if the disease does not progress.
The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of lenvatinib (E7080/MK-7902) plus pembrolizumab (MK-3475) plus chemotherapy compared with chemotherapy alone in participants with advanced/metastatic gastroesophageal cancer. The primary study hypotheses are that lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy is superior to chemotherapy alone for both overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) as assessed by blinded independent central review (BICR), in participants with programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) Combined Positive Score (CPS) ≥1 and in all participants.
This is a study for participants with a type of blood cancer called mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). The main purpose is to compare pirtobrutinib (LOXO-305) to other drugs that work in a similar way that have already been approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (US FDA). Participation could last up to two years, and possibly longer, if the disease does not progress.
Primary Objective: - For Cohort A, Cohort B, and Cohort C Part 2: To assess the antitumor activity of tusamitamab ravtansine in metastatic breast cancer (mBC) and tusamitamab ravtansine monotherapy and in combination with gemcitabine in metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (mPAC) - For Cohort C Part 1: Confirmation of the recommended tusamitamab ravtansine dose when administered in combination with gemcitabine Secondary Objectives: - To assess the safety and tolerability of tusamitamab ravtansine administered as monotherapy and in combination with gemcitabine - To assess other efficacy parameters of tusamitamab ravtansine administered as monotherapy and in combination with gemcitabine - To assess the immunogenicity of tusamitamab ravtansine - To assess the pharmacokinetics (PK) of tusamitamab ravtansine and gemcitabine when given in combination
The purpose of this study is to learn about the effects of three study medicines (encorafenib, binimetinib, and pembrolizumab) given together for the treatment of melanoma that: - is advanced or metastatic (spread to other parts of the body); - has a certain type of abnormal gene called "BRAF"; and - has not received prior treatment. All participants in this study will receive pembrolizumab at the study clinic once every 3 weeks as an intravenous (IV) infusion (given directly into a vein). In addition, half of the participants will take encorafenib and binimetinib orally (by mouth) at home every day. Participants may receive pembrolizumab for up to two years. Those participants taking encorafenib and binimetinib can continue until their melanoma is no longer responding. The study team will monitor how each participant is doing with the study treatment during regular visits at the study clinic.
This study will evaluate the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of DS-1062a versus docetaxel in participants with previously treated advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with or without actionable genomic alterations.