There are about 5012 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in Mexico. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
150 patients with clinically complete chronic spinal cord Injury will be included in a randomized, parallel, placebo controlled, multi-centric, phase III trial. Patients will be evaluated before starting the medication, and at the end of the treatment in the locomotor, sensory, grade of independence, sensitivity and control of bladder and anal sphincters, quality of life, and psychogenic erection in males. Patients will be divided randomly into two groups where one will receive placebo and the other one 4-Aminopyridine (4-AP) in a maximum of 30 weeks in increasing doses.
This is a randomized, controlled, open-label, prospective and longitudinal clinical trial. Rectal, intestinal and bladder EBRT-related toxicity will be assessed according to RTOG / EORTC scales at the first day of EBRT, during the 2nd, 3rd and 4th week of treatment, and 1, 3 and 6 months after the end of radiation treatment. The assessment of quality of life (QoL) will be measured by completing the questionnaire of the European Organization for Research and the Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C-30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) version 3.0, in addition to specific QoL questionnaires for cervical and endometrial cancer respectively (EORTC QLQ-CX 24 and EORTC QLQ-EN24), previously validated in Mexican Spanish-speaking population, and which will be simultaneously applied with the RTOG / EORTC toxicity scales. EXPECTED RESULTS AND PERSPECTIVES: This trial aims to provide information about the feasibility of using a newer EBRT technique, as effective as conventional 3D-conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT), but with less toxicity.
This is a randomized, blinded, non-comparative, two-arm Phase 2 clinical trial to assess the efficacy and safety of AGEN2034 administered with placebo (Treatment Arm 1 - monotherapy) or with AGEN1884 (Treatment Arm 2- combination therapy) for treatment of patients with advanced cervical cancer who relapsed or progressed after receiving first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. The study is not intended to compare the efficacy of the 2 experimental arms. Rather, the efficacy of each arm will be evaluated against its relevant historical controls as appropriate.
This study is open to people with generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP). People can only take part if they have completed treatment in a previous study with spesolimab (1368-0013 or 1368-0027). The goal of this study is to find out how well people with GPP tolerate long-term treatment with spesolimab. The study also tests whether spesolimab helps improve GPP symptoms and how quickly the symptoms improve after a flare-up. Every participant gets spesolimab for almost 5 years (252 weeks). Depending on their symptoms and whether they had a GPP flare during the previous trial, they get spesolimab every few weeks. When participants have a GPP flare during this trial, they get spesolimab as an infusion into a vein. Participants visit their doctors regularly. During these visits, the doctors collect information on any health problems of the participants. To assess the study endpoints, doctors regularly check participants' skin.
The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of pembrolizumab + lenvatinib to chemotherapy in female participants with Stage III, IV, or recurrent endometrial carcinoma. It is hypothesized that the combination of pembrolizumab + lenvatinib will be superior to chemotherapy for progression-free survival (PFS) per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) by blinded independent central review (BICR). It is also hypothesized that the combination of pembrolizumab + lenvatinib will be superior to chemotherapy for overall survival (OS). As of Amendment 7 eligible participants on study completion will be able to transition to an extension study, if available, in which they can continue to receive pembrolizumab monotherapy, lenvatinib monotherapy, or a combination of both pembrolizumab and lenvatinib as received in the parent study.
Studies in the field of health and HIV indicate that threat appraisal is associated with poor adherence to treatment, anxiety, poor quality of life, avoidance behavior, less antiretroviral adherence, negative affect, social, instrumental and emotional stress, depression, global distrés, poor subjective health and psychological distres. Most psychological interventions have been oriented to behavioral aspects, leaving aside cognitive aspects such as threat appraisal, so is necessary to investigate psychological treatments and its impact in threat appraisal an in an clinical and psychological outcomes. Primary objective: To evaluate the efficacy of a cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) to decrease threat appraisal in comparison with Usual Care (UC) in HIV patients initiating antiretroviral treatment at week 8. Secondary objectives: To evaluate the effect of a cognitive behavioral therapy intervention compared with Usual Care in HIV patients initiating antiretroviral treatment in the following variables: challenge appraisal, affect (positive and negative), adherence, quality of life, anxiety and depression, HIV viral load and loss to follow-up at weeks 8, 20 and 52. Exploratory objectives: To assess the threat appraisal cut-off value that predicts favorable outcomes in adherence, virologic suppression, retention in care and adverse events at week 52. The study is an open label, single center, parallel group clinical trial, in which 50 participants will be randomly assigned using a blocked design to one of the 2 arms: Usual Care (single individual psycho-educative session) or Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (Usual care + 6 sessions of individual Cognitive Behavioral Therapy). The sample will be conformed with 50 adults with HIV, naïve to ARV treatment, starting care at INCMNSZ, who have scores of threat appraisal ≥40 in the CEAT scale, without severe mental disorders or cognitive impairment. We will use independent t test and chi square and intention to treat analysis for the primary outcome, also for secondary outcomes t student for continuous variables, chi square for categorical variables and per protocol analysis in participants adherent to the intervention.
Reliable and valid assessment of burn wound depth or healing potential is essential to treatment decision-making, to provide a prognosis, and to compare studies evaluating different treatment modalities. Clinical evaluation remains the most widely used method for assessing the depth of the burn wound. This method is based on the subjective evaluation of visual and tactile characteristics of the wound, with an accuracy ranging between 50 to 70%; which is not precise to guide clinical decision making. The aim of these study is to validate thermography as a therapeutic approach to predict treatment modality based on thermographic imaging of the wound and its healing potential obtained during the first three days of treatment of either healing by re-epithelization, requiring skin grafts, or requiring amputations. By performing this algorithm, it is expected to address three aspects of the management of patients with acute burns: early clinical diagnosis, initial management decisions and reduction of hospitalization days.
The purpose of this study is to test the effectiveness and safety of nivolumab combined with ipilimumab compared to nivolumab monotherapy in participants with previously untreated kidney cancer that has spread.
This study will assess the effect of lowering low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) with evolocumab on major cardiovascular events in adults without a prior myocardial infarction (MI) or stroke who are at high risk of a cardiovascular event.
This trial will compare the application of Glass Ionomer Cement (GIC) sealant with no-intervention for the most clinically- and cost-effective strategy for managing MIH molars without post-eruptive breakdown, in a school setting, using low-technology and child-friendly dental techniques. Methods/Design: This two-arm, parallel group, patient-randomized controlled, superiority trial will have treatment provided in schools. Schoolchildren (age 6-9), presenting at least one MIH molar (n molars = 195,) will have random allocation to treatment with or without the application of a GIC sealant (GC Fuji TRIAGE®, GC Europe, Leuven, Belgium). Baseline measures and outcome data will be assessed through participant report and clinical examination. The primary outcome is the presence of post-eruptive fracture and development of caries lesions. Secondary outcomes are: (1) self-reported dental hypersensitivity; (2) oral health-related-quality of life, reported by children; (3) plaque index, (4) gingival health, (5) caries status (according to ICCMS scores) in primary and permanent teeth; (6) the incremental cost-effectiveness. A trained and calibrated examiner will evaluate the treated teeth every six months post treatment for a period of 36 months. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression tests will be used to investigate the primary outcome. The Logistic Regression and Poisson Regression Analysis will be used to analyze the secondary outcomes (α=5%).