There are about 25435 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in United Kingdom. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
This clinical trial is looking at UCB4594. This is the first time the drug is being tested in humans. UCB4594 is a type of drug called a monoclonal antibody. It has been designed to work by targeting a protein called human leucocyte antigen G (HLA-G) that is found in high levels on some cancer cells. By attaching itself to this protein it may help the immune system to attack and kill the cancer cells. The four main aims of the clinical trial are to find out: 1. The best dose of UCB4594 that can be given safely to participants in the trial. 2. What the side effects of UCB4594 are and how they can be managed. 3. What happens to UCB4594 inside the body and how it affects cancer cells. 4. Whether UCB4594 can cause cancer to shrink.
OPAL is a multicenter observational study, following the natural disease trajectory of participants who have permanent damage to their liver caused by scarring, sometimes also referred to as liver cirrhosis. These participants will also have recently had an acute worsening of their liver disease, which is also known as a hepatic decompensating event, which has resulted in them being admitted to hospital or required them to seek medical attention as an outpatient.
A DDI study consisting of 3 parts conducted as an open label, fixed sequence study in healthy adult subjects.
This project aims to understand the feasibility, acceptability and real-world evidence of a novel UK-based remote brain health clinic for patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). A timely and accurate diagnosis of dementia is a priority in the UK and MCI is indicative of future risk of cognitive decline. An accurate etiological diagnosis of MCI (MCI-subtyping - distinguishing those who are likely to go on to develop dementia and those who are not) is vital for treatment planning. Whilst the assessment of molecular biological markers (biomarkers) for etiological diagnosis of MCI and Alzheimer's disease (AD) is increasingly recommended and employed internationally, the uptake is low in UK memory clinics. The Brain Health Clinic (BHC) has been specifically designed as a state-of-the-art diagnostic centre for those with MCI. Procedures will include a range of clinical and biomarker assessments, with molecular biomarkers based on lumbar puncture and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis. Additionally, the clinic will employ remote neuropsychiatric assessments using digital and telephonic methods. This allows for regular contact, whilst adhering to changes in clinical practice and national guidance due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Our overarching objectives are to first establish the acceptability and feasibility of the remote Brain Health Clinic and its novel clinical and biomarker assessment programme. Then secondly establish the impact of care under the Brain Health Clinic on i) care management decisions (e.g. follow-up and treatment planning); ii) time to etiological diagnosis of MCI (MCI-subtyping); and iii) time to diagnosis of dementia and severity of dementia at the time of diagnosis.
This randomised control clinical trial aims to investigate the effects of exercise training and diet on physical and functional fitness and immunological and metabolic changes in adults with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. Investigators will randomise participants to either 12 weeks of supervised/semi-supervised exercise only, exercise + nutritional guidance, or no exercise.
This mixed-methods acceptability study aims to investigate whether an early acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) based intervention called ProACTive™, aimed at supporting burns patients' adjustment to a changed appearance and preventing distress, is acceptable. This will be measured by descriptive data, questionnaire data and semi-structured interviews. Preliminary data on the potential clinical effectiveness of the intervention will also be gathered. This will be measured by scores on standardised questionnaires.
Life expectancy has been increasing for the last 150 years, but the maintenance of health has not kept pace with increased lifespan, and on average, UK adults spend the last decade of life in poor-health, with major consequences for society and the individual. Persistent physical inactivity is thought to be a key contributing factor to the risk of poor health and functional decline occurring in middle-aged and older adults. It is therefore concerning that most middle-aged adults spend >8hrs/day being sedentary, with average step count of 3000-4000 steps/day. To be able to holistically assess the effectiveness of future strategies to address age-related decline in health, and devise public health messages to help individuals reach older age in better health, it is essential that the complex physiological effects that activity and inactivity have across biological systems are characterised. The goal of this intervention study is to compare the impact of physical activity and inactivity on body functioning. Twenty moderately active participants will decrease their physical activity for six months to match the average amount carried out by middle-aged people in the UK. They will then undertake 3-months of reconditioning training to restore their fitness. In addition, twenty sedentary participants will increase their physical activity to UK recommended levels for six months. Before and at points during the intervention period, participants will be asked to make some measurements at home and attend the University of Nottingham to have multiple assessments made. These include; - fitness, muscle strength and function tests, - completion of questionnaires and computer-based brain puzzles - having muscle and fat tissue biopsies and blood samples taken. - The study also involves having MRI scans. This 5-year study will commence in January 2024, with participant recruitment starting in March 2024 and finishing in May 2027.
Supervised, prescribed exercise has positive effects on body composition, physical functioning, psychological wellbeing and quality of life for patients after breast cancer treatment. However, exercise interventions are often time consuming, commonly take place at a health or fitness facility, and usually require a trained professional to be present. Cost-effective, enjoyable and practical approaches, that can be adopted at home or in local surroundings are needed. For example, an alternative approach is using an electronic physical activity tracking wristwatch to help patients engage with exercise or physical activity. Research demonstrates the importance of structured and supervised exercise for breast cancer survivors. However, it is not known whether other approaches (e.g. home-based exercise and physical activity) alongside the use of personalised technology-enabled feedback, can cause similar improvements to health when compared to structured exercise. The overall aim of this study is to determine whether cardiorespiratory fitness is changed by a technology enabled, remotely delivered exercise intervention and to determine whether this change is similar to the change caused by a partly supervised, prescribed exercise intervention. This study will also determine the influence of both interventions on physical functioning, body composition and blood pressure.
Part A Multiple organ dysfunction syndrome is one of the main problems in critically ill patients. Several organ dysfunctions are routinely and systematically monitored in patients admitted to intensive care units. Gastrointestinal dysfunction is currently not included in multiple organ dysfunction scores and lacks a standardised approach. At the same time, investigators earlier studies have shown that gastrointestinal dysfunction plays an essential role in the course of illness in intensive care patients. A tool for measuring dysfunction is needed to enable future studies on interventions to improve gastrointestinal function. The GIDS (GastroIntestinal Dysfunction Score) combines different clinical signs and symptoms commonly observed and documented in patients in the ICU into a scoring system, allowing distinguishing between different grades of severity of dysfunction. The investigators will only use observations documented during the patient's stay in the intensive care unit without additional measurements and calculate gastrointestinal (GIDS) and other organ dysfunction scores. Part B Phosphate is an electrolyte commonly measured and often corrected, while the indications and clear guidance for correction are insufficiently studied. The results of this study will assist in specifying indications for the correction of phosphate levels better and refine the management strategies in the future. Only phosphate levels measured as part of routine care will be documented, no additional samples for study purposes will be taken, and the study will not influence the treatment of phosphate disorders.
Cough has previously been described by the type of cough you have ie such as wet, dry, and chesty, and also by its features such as how often you are coughing its,intensity, and severity, but never has the varying patterns of cough been studied in any detail and it could be that the pattern of the cough is closely related to patient-perceived intensity, frequency and most importantly severity. Cough is a symptom and like any other symptom (such as pain) the severity of it can only be gauged by the patient experiencing it. We have created a one-page brand newl questionnaire that shows 4 distinct cough patterns that we believe exist and an empty field designed so that patients can record a pattern of cough they experience which is not already a choice on the questionnaire. The questionnaire also records patients' experience of how frequent, and intense, the cough is, and how it disrupts their lives, on a 1-10 scale (Visual analogue scale), the sum of these scores is collated and this gives us a severity score. The first phase of the project is to determine whether 30 Chronic cough patients understand the questionnaire, and are able to complete it with little direction, and if the cough patterns we identified encompassed all pattern types. second part of the study is to look at how repeatable the questionnaire is when completed over a 6 week period.