There are about 1645 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in Czech Republic. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
This is an open-label continuation study designed to monitor the safety, tolerability and effectiveness of lurasidone in subjects who have completed participation in a lurasidone extension study (NCT00868959 and NCT01566162) and who may benefit from continued treatment with lurasidone.
The purpose of study is to explore the effect of CP-690,550 (Tofacitinib) on measures of kidney function in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
The study is designed to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of tralokinumab as compared to placebo. Investigational product will be administered as subcutaneous injection. All patients will continue background therapy for ulcerative colitis as per local standards of care in addition to investigational product.
The study is conducted in order to find out if repeated doses of the monoclonal (artificially manufactured) antibody BT061 can help arthritis patients whose disease does not sufficiently respond to a treatment with methotrexate (MTX).
Purpose of this trial: 1. To assess the efficacy and safety of NeuVax™ administered with adjuvant Leukine® (sargramostim, GM-CSF). 2. To evaluate and compare the disease free survival (DFS) in the vaccinated and control subjects.
Laterally Spreading Tumors (LST) are important precursosrs of invasive colorectal cancer. Endoscopic treatment has replaced surgery in most of the cases. Nevertheless, after conventional Endoscopic Mucosal Resection (CER), Local Residual Neoplasia (LRN) is an issue. Therefore, endoscopic follow-up and treatment are necessary. To decrease its occurrence, the risk factors of LRN shoudl be identified. Thereafter, in high-risk patients, other modalities of initial treatment including Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (ESD) and surgical treatment, could be considered. The purpose of this prospective study is to identify risk factors associated with the presence of LRN after CER of LSTs.
The purpose of the study is to assess the safety of repeated applications of QUTENZA in reducing pain intensity in subjects who have peripheral neuropathic pain due to diabetes.
The objective of this study is to compare the progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), time to treatment failure (TTF), duration of response (DoR), quality of life, safety and tolerability of tivozanib in combination with mFOLFOX6 and bevacizumab in combination with mFOLFOX6.
Primary Objective: - The purpose of this study is to compare insulin glargine/ lixisenatide fixed ratio combination versus insulin glargine on glycemic control over 24 weeks, as evaluated by HbA1c (glycosylated hemoglobin) reduction in type 2 diabetic patients treated with metformin Secondary Objectives: - To compare insulin glargine/lixisenatide fixed ratio combination versus insulin glargine over 24 weeks on: - Glycemic control in relation to a meal as evaluated by post-prandial plasma glucose and glucose excursions during a standardized meal test - Percentage of patients reaching HbA1c <7% or ≤6.5% - 7-point Self-Monitored Plasma Glucose (SMPG) profile - Body weight - Insulin glargine dose - Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) - Percentage of patients requiring rescue therapy during the 24-week open label treatment period - To assess safety and tolerability of insulin glargine/ lixisenatide fixed ratio combination.
The purpose of this study is to demonstrate that Fibrinogen Concentrate (Human)(FCH) can reduce the amount of donor blood products needed during complex cardiovascular surgery, and that it is safe and well tolerated. Subjects in this study will get either a FCH or placebo infusion during surgery. This will be in addition to the standard treatment, which is donor blood or blood products. Placebo does not contain any effective medicine. The study is randomised. This means that the likelihood that subjects will get FCH or placebo is 50%. To make the comparison between FCH and placebo as fair as possible, the study is "double blind". This means that neither the subjects nor the study doctor will know if FCH or placebo is administered. If necessary, the study doctor can find out which treatment the subjects are receiving.