View clinical trials related to Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.
Filter by:People living with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) may experience worsening of symptoms such as shortness of breath, cough and wheezing in addition to changes that may be expected for having COPD. The worsening of symptoms is called exacerbations or flare-ups and can be debilitating and frightening, requiring additional treatment, often with azithromycin. This is an antibiotic medicine that also has anti-inflammatory properties. It is prescribed as long-term prevention to reduce the risk of flare-ups. Some people may be affected by side effects from azithromycin. Antibiotic resistance is another concern, especially when using azithromycin for prevention rather than to treat active infection. It is currently unclear as to whether people should be advised to stop taking azithromycin once COPD has stabilised, or to stop it over the summer when fewer flare-ups happen. It is also not known if azithromycin is more effective in some people or more likely to cause side effects in others. Given these uncertainties, it is challenging to know how best to use azithromycin in managing COPD. Azithromycin is a valuable antibiotic, and should be prescribed where it has benefit but avoid unnecessary side effects and reduce the chances of bacteria becoming resistant to it. The purpose of this trial is to be able to gain results to answer these questions, and to establish the effects of stopping azithromycin in people whose COPD has stabilised, who have been taking it for at least 3 months. This trial will compare continuing azithromycin with stopping it completely, or stopping over the summer only, continuing over the winter. The investigators will compare the effects of these three treatments in the trial on flare-ups, symptoms and quality of life, and find out what factors may affect how individual participants respond to them.
The primary aim of our study is to examine the relationship between balance and respiratory function, respiratory and peripheral muscle strength, functional capacity, and cognitive function in patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). The secondary aim of our study is to compare respiratory function, respiratory and peripheral muscle strength, functional capacity, balance, and cognitive functions of COPD patients and healthy individuals. This study will examine and record the participant's sociodemographic information and medical records. Balance, respiratory function, respiratory and peripheral muscle strength, functional capacity, and cognitive function will be assessed. Since the patients are included in this study, no intervention will be made, no additional tests will be performed, or no changes will be made in the routine treatments of the patients during the study.
Background: In 2019, a novel coronavirus (SARS-COV2) was detected in Wuhan, China as a cause of acute respiratory distress syndrome (COVID-19). Other previous coronaviruses (SARS and MERS) have caused respiratory sequelae (pulmonary fibrosis) demonstrable by tomography and lung function tests. These alterations have begun to be detected in patients who have survived COVID-19. Hypotheses: SARS-COV2 infection accelerates the deterioration of lung function in patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). Objectives: To analyze the evolution of lung function in COPD patients diagnosed with COVID-19, while comparing it with COPD patients without COVID-19 disease. Methodology: Cohort study. The COPD-COVID-19 cohort will consist of the COPD population with and without COVID-19. Previous pulmonary function data will be collected and 2 prospective visits (baseline and follow-up) with clinical assessments and functional tests will be performed. In the event that the participant suffers from COVID-19 during the follow-up, an additional visit will be performed 3 months after the diagnosis, and the final visit will take place 12 months after this additional visit. Determinations: Study factor: diagnosis of COVID-19. Response variable: change in the forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) measured at the start of the study and after 1 year of this first assessment, considering also the basal FEV1 (before March 2020). Other variables: socio-demographic, clinical, functional and treatment. Expected results: Greater decrease in FEV1 in COPD patients with COVID-19, Applicability and Relevance: The proactive detection of functional sequelae will allow early treatment, including pulmonary rehabilitation, with the aim of improving the quality of life of these patients.
The goal of this randomized controlled trial is to determine the effect of adding inhaled furosemide to the known treatment of patient with Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbation. It primarily aims at studying its effect on: 1. Relief of dyspnea sensation 2. Length of hospital stay Participants will be receiving the standard therapy of COPD exacerbation plus either inhaled furosemide or inhaled saline over 3 days. They will be asked to: - Perform spirometry - Fill in dyspnea score - Do arterial blood gases (ABGs)
Scientific Rationale: In late 2019 and early 2020, researchers at the Wuhan Institute of Virology identified a potential new etiologic agent, called new coronavirus 2019 (nCoV-2019). Subsequently, the epidemic unleashed by this virus involved the whole world and radically changed the habits of the entire global population. Since that time, in fact, the need to contain the spread of infection through specific social distancing procedures and through the use of personal protective equipment has become compelling. The main tool was the requirement for all citizens to wear masks for airway protection. This measure has thus become in daily use for the majority of the population. Therefore, it has become increasingly important to evaluate the impact of mask wearing on activities of daily living (ADls), both in healthy subjects, for which several evidences have already been brought, and in patients with different diseases, for which data are still insufficient to fully describe the effects. Oxygen consumption and dyspnea during simple activities of daily living (ADLs) have already been studied in patients with heart failure (HF) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and there is evidence that these subjects compared with healthy subjects perform ADLs at a higher percentage of their peak VO2 with more dyspnea. However, there are still no studies highlighting, however, the consequences of performing such activities while wearing a protective filtering facepiece particles class 2 (FFP2) mask, to date considered the most suitable to preserve the most fragile subjects from infection. In this study, therefore, the investigators aim to asess the effects of these devices on the ability to perform ADLs by evaluating the exchanges of respiratory gases in the body during the performance of normal activities or during sleep in patients with HF or COPD compared with healthy subjects.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the ability of the Bora Care remote monitoring solution to detect early acute exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD).
This is a phase 1, open-label, parallel cohort study to evaluate the PK, safety and tolerability of nebulized ensifentrine following administration of single and multiple doses in healthy Chinese male subjects.
The aim of this study is to investigate whether a smartwatch can measure the physical capacity of patients with Parkinson's Disease and COPD in the physiotherapy practice and at home.
The aim of this study is to quantify the burden of severe AECOPD in South Korea, by investigating the association between frequency of severe AECOPD and clinical and health-care utilization outcomes.
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is heterogeneous lung condition characterized by chronic respiratory symptoms (dyspnea, cough, sputum production, exacerbations) due to abnormalities of the airways (bronchitis, bronchiolitis) and/or alveoli (emphysema) that cause persistent, often progressive ,airflow obstruction. There are network meta analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of short acting bronchodilators Vs long acting agents in treatment of COPD