View clinical trials related to Conjunctivitis, Allergic.
Filter by:The objective of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of OTX-DP (dexamethasone insert) 0.4 mg for intracanalicular use when placed in the canaliculus of the eyelid for the treatment of the signs and symptoms of chronic allergic conjunctivitis
This study is a Post-Marketing Surveillance study in Korea to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Relestat Ophthalmic Solution 0.05% in patients with allergic conjunctivitis who are treated with Relestat as standard of care in clinical practice.
This is a continuing research study of a vaccine for allergy to Japanese Red Cedar. The vaccine is called CryJ2-DNA-LAMP Plasmid vaccine. This research study will determine how the vaccine is tolerated and how previous Phase IA research participants respond to the vaccine in a booster dose. CryJ2-DNA-LAMP Plasmid vaccine is investigational, which means it is not approved for use by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) but is available in research studies like this one. The study is a Phase IB, prospective, three cohort, open label study conducted on one cohorts of non-atopic subjects and two cohorts of subjects with a history of allergic rhinitis symptoms to Japanese red cedar CryJ 2 pollen allergen that participated in the previous Phase IA study (all the subjects participated in the previous study). The study will be conducted at 1 study center. Subjects are enrolled in the trial for a period of 80 days. The objectives of the statistical analyses are to establish the safety and to explore the immunogenicity of the LAMP-vax vaccine. All statistical analyses conducted on the data from this trial will be exploratory in nature. The primary objective of this Phase IB Study is to evaluate the safety and immunological responses of an additional dose of CryJ2-DNA-LAMP plasmid vaccine delivered intramuscularly (IM) to subjects who previously received 4 doses of CryJ2-DNA-LAMP vaccine delivered IM every 2 weeks in the previous Phase IA study.
This study investigates the safety of two up-dosing regimen. The safety of PURETHAL Birch will be evaluated in a rush regimen (maximum dose reached in 3 injections during 3 weeks) compared to the conventional regimen (maximum dose reached in 6 injections during 6 weeks). The primary endpoint of the sudy is the comparison of the proportions of the patients who have successfully reached the maintenance dose between the two treatment regimes. A similar previous study with PURETHAL Grasses has shown that the rush up-dosing scheme is as safe as the conventional up-dosing regime. Therefore it is expected that up-dosing with PURETHAL Birch according to the rush regimen is as safe as using the conventional regimen.
This study will assess efficacy and safety of intraseasonal specific short-term immunotherapy with Depiquick® Birch in patients with allergic rhinitis and or rhinoconjunctivitis with or without intermittent asthma that have a clinical relevant IgE-mediated allergic sensitization against birch pollen. The term "intraseasonal" means that patients will start with immunotherapy treatment during the birch pollen season, i.e. when the already experience allergic symptoms.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the onset and duration of action of AC-170 0.24% compared to vehicle in the prevention of the signs and symptoms of allergic conjunctivitis in the conjunctival allergen challenge (CAC) model.
The purpose of this study is to assess the effect on various biomarkers of treatment with MK-8237 in participants with allergic rhinitis or rhinoconjunctivitis. In Part 1 of the study healthy participants undergo nasal allergen challenge (NAC) with house dust mite (HDM) extract in order to verify the operational performance of NAC and associated sample collection methods. Part 2, the main study, is a placebo controlled, double blind study of participants with HDM-induced allergic rhinitis or rhinoconjunctivitis. The primary hypotheses are that the changes from baseline in post-allergen challenge HDM-specific Immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4) and Immunoglobulin E blocking factor (IgE-BF) are greater after treatment with MK-8237 than after treatment with placebo.
This study will evaluate the safety and efficacy of AGN-229666 for the treatment of allergic conjunctivitis.
The objective of this study is to compare the efficacy of two different dosing regimen of NOVA22007 (1mg/ml ciclosporin/cyclosporine) eye drops, emulsion versus placebo (vehicle of the formulation) administered four times a day in patients with severe vernal keratoconjunctivitis after 4 months of treatment.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate an ophthalmic solution for the treatment of ocular itching associated with allergic conjunctivitis using the Conjunctival Allergen Challenge (CAC) model.