Colonoscopy Clinical Trial
Official title:
Can a WhatsApp Reminder Improve the Quality of Screening Colonoscopy? A Randomized Controlled Study
It is estimated that there are about 1.4 million patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) worldwide, with a rising trend in CRC incidence in many Asian Pacific countries. In Hong Kong, colorectal cancer ranks first in cancer incidence and second in cancer mortality based on data from 2014. CRC is one of the most preventable cancers because its development in general follows an adenoma-carcinoma sequence. Adenomas are considered precursor lesions for CRC. Recent guidelines from USA, Europe and Asia Pacific region recommend CRC screening for average-risk asymptomatic individuals starting at age 50. Modalities such as guaiac-based fecal occult blood tests (gFOBT), fecal immunochemical tests (FIT), flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS), and colonoscopy are among the acceptable options for CRC screening. While early detection and removal of colorectal adenoma by screening colonoscopy with polypectomy reduce CRC incidence and mortality, interval cancers (cancers that develop after a colonoscopy and before the next scheduled colonoscopy) may still occur and were reported to account for up to 10.5% of CRC. a CRC has been associated with proximal colon location, small lesion, flat lesion, missed lesion, inadequate examination, incomplete resection of lesion, tumor biology, and low adenoma detection rate (ADR). High ADR (eg, ≥ 20%) has been associated with a reduced risk of interval CRC. Bowel preparation includes diet restriction and proper use of laxative before the colonoscopy, and this is one of the important factors to ensure a high quality colonoscopy. Suboptimal bowel preparation may lead to decreased ADR, cecal intubation rate, and surveillance interval and increased procedural time. Efforts to improve bowel cleansing quality through traditional communication routines, including face-to-face verbal education, written booklet or visual aids or telephone-based re-instruction have proven to be useful. A recent study using WeChat, a widely used social media mobile app in China, has also shown to be effectively improving bowel preparation level of a mixed population who received diagnostic (77%), screening (15.8%) and surveillance (7.2%) colonoscopy. However, the impact of social media mobile app on the bowel preparation level of screening colonoscopy is not yet known. Hence, this study will investigate the effectiveness of the most popular social media app worldwide, WhatsApp in bowel preparation level of screening colonoscopy.
It is estimated that there are about 1.4 million patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) worldwide, with a rising trend in CRC incidence in many Asian Pacific countries. In Hong Kong, colorectal cancer ranks first in cancer incidence and second in cancer mortality based on data from 2014. CRC is one of the most preventable cancers because its development in general follows an adenoma-carcinoma sequence. Adenomas are considered precursor lesions for CRC. Recent guidelines from USA, Europe and Asia Pacific region recommend CRC screening for average-risk asymptomatic individuals starting at age 50. Modalities such as guaiac-based fecal occult blood tests (gFOBT), fecal immunochemical tests (FIT), flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS), and colonoscopy are among the acceptable options for CRC screening. While early detection and removal of colorectal adenoma by screening colonoscopy with polypectomy reduce CRC incidence and mortality, interval cancers (cancers that develop after a colonoscopy and before the next scheduled colonoscopy) may still occur and were reported to account for up to 10.5% of CRC. a CRC has been associated with proximal colon location, small lesion, flat lesion, missed lesion, inadequate examination, incomplete resection of lesion, tumor biology, and low adenoma detection rate (ADR). High ADR (eg, ≥ 20%) has been associated with a reduced risk of interval CRC. Bowel preparation includes diet restriction and proper use of laxative before the colonoscopy, and this is one of the important factors to ensure a high quality colonoscopy. Suboptimal bowel preparation may lead to decreased ADR, cecal intubation rate, and surveillance interval and increased procedural time. Efforts to improve bowel cleansing quality through traditional communication routines, including face-to-face verbal education, written booklet or visual aids or telephone-based re-instruction have proven to be useful. A recent study using WeChat, a widely used social media mobile app in China, has also shown to be effectively improving bowel preparation level of a mixed population who received diagnostic (77%), screening (15.8%) and surveillance (7.2%) colonoscopy. However, the impact of social media mobile app on the bowel preparation level of screening colonoscopy is not yet known. Hence, this study will investigate the effectiveness of the most popular social media app worldwide, WhatsApp in bowel preparation level of screening colonoscopy. Subjects already recruited by other studies in Institute of Digestive Disease and arranged for an out-patient screening colonoscopy will be identified and recruited. Demographic data including age, sex, smoking and alcohol habits, comorbidities, education level, family income, time of using WhatsApp of the eligible subjects will be collected. Subjects will then be randomized to either standard group or WhatsApp group. As a usual practice, all subjects will receive a verbal explanation of bowel preparation by a healthcare professional on the day of appointment making. A detailed written bowel preparation instruction will be also given to subjects. For subjects randomized to the WhatsApp reminder group, they will receive an additional WhatsApp reminder with same content of the written instruction and a video of explanation of bowel preparation by a nurse 4 days prior colonoscopy. Subjects are encouraged to ask any question regarding the bowel preparation via WhatsApp. All these enquiries will be replied by the principal investigator during office hours. The colonoscopy results, including, the bowel preparation level and the number and nature of lesion found (if any) will be collected afterwards. Two investigators reviewed all the colonoscopy videos independently to grade the quality of bowel preparation by Boston Bowel Preparation Scale. ;
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT04101097 -
Training and Validation of Models of Factors to Predict Inadequate Bowel Preparation Colonoscopy
|
||
Completed |
NCT03247595 -
Testing How Well Magnesium Citrate Capsules Work as Preparation for a Colonoscopy
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04214301 -
An Open-Label Preference Evaluation of BLI800
|
Phase 4 | |
Withdrawn |
NCT05754255 -
Comparison of High-flow Oxygen With or Without Nasal Positive Airway Pressure (PAP) During Propofol Sedation for Colonoscopy in an Ambulatory Surgical Center
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT02484105 -
Comforting Conversation During Colonoscopy: A Trial on Patient Satisfaction
|
Phase 4 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT02264249 -
Residual Gastric Volume in Same Day Versus Split Dose and Evening Before Bowel Preparation
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT01978509 -
The Affect of Low-Volume Bowel Preparation for Hospitalized Patients Colonoscopies
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01964417 -
The Comparative Study Between Bowel Preparation Method
|
Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT01685970 -
Comparison of Same-day 2 Sachets Picosulfate Versus High Volume PEG for Afternoon Colonoscopy
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT01518790 -
Short Course, Single-dose PEG 3350 for Colonoscopy Prep in Children
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT00748293 -
Achievement of Better Examinee Compliance on Colon Cleansing Using Commercialized Low-Residue Diet
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00779649 -
MoviPrep® Versus HalfLytely®, Low-VolUme PEG Solutions for Colon Cleansing: An InvesTigator-blindEd, Randomized, Trial
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT00671177 -
Clinical Evaluation of Water Immersion Colonoscopy Insertion Technique
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00380497 -
Pico-Salax Versus Poly-Ethylene Glycol for Bowel Cleanout Before Colonoscopy in Children
|
Phase 4 | |
Recruiting |
NCT00160823 -
Impact of a Self-Administered Information Leaflet on Adequacy of Colonic Cleansing for in-Hospital Patients
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT00390598 -
PEG Solution (Laxabon®) 4L Versus Senna Glycoside (Pursennid® Ex-Lax) 36mg and PEG Solution (Laxabon®) 2L for Large Bowel Cleansing Prior to Colonoscopy
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT00314418 -
Patient Position and Impact on Colonoscopy Time
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00209573 -
A Study of AQUAVAN® Injection Versus Midazolam HCl for Sedation in Patients Undergoing Elective Colonoscopy
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT00427089 -
Comparison of 2L NRL994 With NaP Preparation in Colon Cleansing Prior to Colonoscopies for Colon Tumor Screening
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT05823350 -
The Effect of Abdominal Massage on Pain and Distention After Colonoscopy
|
N/A |