View clinical trials related to Colonic Polyps.
Filter by:When the DNA inside of human cells undergoes certain alterations (mutations), the cells may develop into a cancer. The cancer cells may shed this DNA into the blood stream. This circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) can be detected by very sensitive, specialized laboratory tests. Measurement of ctDNA has been shown to be useful for following patients with known cancer. It has also been found in the circulation of some patients with early stage cancer. The purpose of this study is to examine blood specimens for the presence of ctDNA in individuals without known cancer who are scheduled to undergo a screening or diagnostic colonoscopy in order to see if the ctDNA test can detect a cancer or precancerous condition at a very early stage before the patient becomes symptomatic. The results of this study should help define the role of ctDNA in the detection of early stage colon cancer and to define how sensitive it is (i.e. how well it picks up cancer when it is present) and how specific it is (i.e. how often is ctDNA found in patients with benign diseases or no abnormalities).
Colorectal cancer ist the 2nd most leading cancer among men and women in germany. Screening colonoscopy has the potential to detect premalignant lesions. By endoscopical resection of these lesions, colorectal cancers could be avoided. The decision for surveillance is made according to patients medical history, amount and histological characteristics of the resected polyps. Molecular guided decisions are still missing. Thus, further tools and mechanisms, beyond but in addition to endoscopy and histopathological, are strongly required to reduce such interval carcinomas and get a better and deeper inside into molecular alterations which occurs in premalignant lesions in the colon and describe risk populations which might benefit from shorter surveillance strategies by colonoscopy. Therefore GENESIS will enroll 100 patients, which underwent screening colonoscopy with polyp ectomy. All biopsies were stored and processed without formalin in special boxes (PaxGene by Qiagen®). After microdissection of polyp tissue and isolation of DNA targeted next generation sequencing of 38 cancer-related genes followed by bioinformatics and systems biology analyses. The sequencing results were correlated to the endoscopical and histopathological findings. In parallel we are collecting EDTA-blood samples for analysis of circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) to investigate the potential of liquid biopsies in premalignant colorectal lesions.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the performance of the SEPT9 gene methylation assay in Colorectal cancer (CRC) high-risk population in Chinese hospitals using the opportunistic screening method. The trial plans to evaluate a Chinese domestic SEPT9 assay kit produced by BioChain (Beijing) Science and Technology Corporation, who is a close partner of Epigenomics AG, the producer for Epi proColon 2.0 CE.
The study evaluates whether the use of a novel endoscopic cap (the endo-cuff) at the tip of a colonoscope improves the numbers of polyps detected during bowel cancer screening colonoscopy. Half the patients will have standard colonoscopy and half will have colonoscopy with the cap attached.
This study aims to investigate the comparative effectiveness between polyp removal with or without electrical current. The investigators want to include 600 polyps in the trial. It is known that polyps have the potential to develop to cancer if left in situ, but the investigators do not know the best way to remove them completely.
Given the limited existing data regarding the advantages and limitations of the existing techniques in the removal of colonic polyps the investigators designed a prospective study in order to compare cold snare vs hot snare vs argon plasma coagulation for the compete removal of colonic polyps of the left colon up to a diameter of 0.8cm.
In this study, Dutch gastroenterologists who are certified for performing colonoscopies on FIT-positive patients in the Dutch population screening program are trained in optical diagnosis with validated methods. After this training, an ex- and in-vivo test phase leads to "accreditation" and endoscopists will be observed in their optical diagnosis for 1 year. During this year, half of the endoscopists will be randomized towards 3-monthly feedback and the other half will receive feedback on their results after 1 year. The endoscopic prediction of endoscopists on polyp histology will be compared to histopathological outcome.
There is no consensus method for removal of diminutive (5mm) to small(6-9mm) colorectal polyps at colonoscopy. Neither the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy or the American Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy have guidelines for the removal of these polyps, despite the fact that around 90% of lesions removed by polypectomy at colonoscopy are diminutive to small. Multiple techniques are used for polyp removal, especially diminutive lesions. These include either forceps, both hot and cold, as well as snare with electrocautery or cold snare. Forceps utilises shearing force to grasp tissue and remove it, with the hot method passing a current through the grasper to essentially burn tissue. Snare is the use of a small metal loop placed and tightened at the base of polyps to cut through the tissue either straight away in a cold method or with electrocautery where a small current is passed through the loop to assist cutting through tissue. Surveys of Colonoscopists and Gastroenterologists in Australia and the United States show that the choice of method used for diminutive to small polyps is highly variable with cold snaring marginally favoured.Studies into polypectomy techniques are limited and it is clear that additional data and the review of polypectomy methods needs to be undertaken in order determine the optimal method for the removal of diminutive and small colorectal polyps. A technique is used at the Gloucestershire National Health Service (NHS) trust involving a submucosal pre injection with a standard solution then the use of cold forceps for removal of polyps ≤7mm. This appears to be both very safe and highly effective method for the removal of these lesions compared to other techniques. No formal published studies have been completed to evaluate this method at national and international levels. We propose a study to evaluate the effectiveness, safety and costs of this method.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of NICE classification to predict deep submucosal invasion of colonic polyps > 1 cm, considering histology as the gold standard, in a group of endoscopists who previously performed a training program.
The investigators conducted a study "Resect and Discard Diminutive Polyps: a new paradigm" (IRB ID # 201105473) from September, 2011 to July, 2013. This study examined whether doctors performing colonoscopy are accurate enough at predicting histology of small colorectal polyps, such that these small polyps could be resected and discarded (instead of being sent to pathology). One of the main advantages of this approach is significant cost savings by reducing pathology costs associated with screening and surveillance colonoscopy. A disadvantage is that there is a 0.03% chance that small polyps contain cancer. There is no data regarding patient preferences toward this approach. The investigators therefore designed a patient survey to determine the patient's view toward this approach.