View clinical trials related to Colitis, Ulcerative.
Filter by:The ULTRAZ study is designed to better understand the mode of action of S1P receptor modulators. The alteration of leukocyte trafficking due to S1P receptors such as ozanimod is mainly investigated in rodent studies. Several previous studies show a reduced total leukocyte count in peripheral blood and only two study reported the effect of leukocyte subgroups before and after treatment with ozanimod. The change in leukocyte subgroups in peripheral blood as well as colonic mucosa and lymph nodes have not been investigated to our knowledge. Therefore, the aim of this study is to explore the changes in these three compartments.
A randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, multicentre, phase III, non inferiority trial of an oral mesalazine formulation in patients with active mild to moderate ulcerative colitis for the induction of remission.
1. characterize the response to current medical therapy in adult with ulcerative colitis . 2. Detect prognostic factors of response of biological therapy in adult with ulcerative colitis
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of vixarelimab compared with placebo in participants with moderate to severe UC who have demonstrated inadequate response to, loss of response to, or intolerance to prior conventional or advanced therapy.
ROSETTA STUDY: This study will evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of Rosnilimab in subjects with moderate to severe ulcerative colitis (UC)
The purpose of this retrospective observational cohort study is to assess pregnancy and infant outcomes in three groups: the first is women with ulcerative colitis (UC) who were exposed to ozanimod during pregnancy; the second is women with UC exposed to conventional therapy during pregnancy; the third is women with UC exposed to advanced therapy during pregnancy. This study will use data from a large US healthcare claims database.
The goal of this clinical trial is to determine at how well a new medical food works in managing inflammation associated with ulcerative colitis in children. The main question it aims to answer is: 1) How well does the new medical food lower an inflammatory biomarker known as fecal calprotectin (fCal) in ulcerative colitis as compared to the historical active therapy levels of fCal? Participants will take a specified dose of the medical food in water each day for 12 weeks. The level of fCal will be measured through a stool sample at baseline, one during the 12 weeks, at the end of 12 weeks, and once more at 16 weeks. The levels of fCal will be compared across the 16 weeks and compared with levels before the new medical food was taken.
ALTB-268-201 is a Phase 2a, multicenter, single arm, multiple-dose, open-label study evaluating the efficacy and safety of ALTB-268 in subjects with moderately to severely active UC. The study consists of a Screening Phase, an Induction Phase, and a Maintenance Phase. Eligible subjects will be enrolled to receive a SC loading dose of ALTB-268 followed by weekly doses of ALTB-268 for 12 weeks. Primary efficacy endpoint will be evaluated at week 12. Week 12 dosing will occur during the 40 wks Maintenance Phase. During 40 weeklong maintenance phase SC doses of ALTB-268 will be administered every other week. At week 52, all subjects will have an endoscopy performed and efficacy and safety evaluation will take place.
The main aim of this study is to learn how the body of a child or teenager with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC) or Crohn's disease (CD) processes vedolizumab (pharmacokinetics) given just under the skin subcutaneously (SC). The participants will be treated with vedolizumab for up to 34 weeks. During the study, participants will visit their study clinic several times.
It's of great importance to effectively induce and maintain disease remission in patients with moderate to severe ulcerative colitis (UC). Vedolizumab (VDZ) is known for its high safety profile and confirmed therapeutic efficacy in UC treatment. However, according to the experience in clinical practice, the effect onset speed of vedolizumab is relatively slow. Upadacitinib (UPA), however, works quickly, which complements the defect of slow onset of VDZ induction. However, the safety of UPA used in situations such as infection and tumors is inferior to that of VDZ, and long-term use requires testing for the risk of adverse events such as deep vein thrombosis. Therefore, if the advantages of long-term maintenance therapy safety of VDZ and rapid induced remission of UPA are fully utilized, the combination of VDZ and UPA induction for 8 weeks, followed by the use of single drug VDZ in maintenance therapy, can maximize the clinical benefits of UC patients. Due to the lack of high-level clinical research data at home and abroad, we plan to conduct a multicenter prospective randomized controlled clinical study to provide the evidence-based basis for the efficacy analysis of the sequential treatment of moderate to severe UC patients with VDZ and UPA.