Carcinoma, Hepatocellular Clinical Trial
Official title:
A Phase 2, Randomized, Double Blind Study To Evaluate The Efficacy, Safety, Pharmacodynamics And Pharmacokinetics Of The Anti-alk-1 Monoclonal Antibody Pf-03446962 In Combination With Best Supportive Care Vs. Placebo Plus Best Supportive Care In Adult Patients With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma Following Failure Of Sorafenib
Verified date | October 2015 |
Source | Pfizer |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | United States: Food and Drug Administration |
Study type | Interventional |
The primary purpose of the study is to explore whether treatment with PF-03446962 and best supportive care is better than placebo plus best supportive care in prolonging survival of patients affected by recurrent liver cancer. In addition, the study will explore if adding PF-03446962 to best supportive care is safe, how PF-03446962 is metabolized, if there are patients' characteristics (biomarkers) that may predict response to PF-03446962, and if PF-03446962 has any effect on the patients' quality of life.
Status | Terminated |
Enrollment | 3 |
Est. completion date | July 2014 |
Est. primary completion date | July 2014 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | Both |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - Diagnosis of locally advanced or metastatic liver cancer obtained by histology/cytology or by imaging - Documented progression on or after treatment with sorafenib, confirmed by the Investigator upon review of appropriate imaging documentation - Child Pugh Class A disease - ECOG [Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group] Performance Status (PS) 0 or 1 - Mandatory tumor biopsy at study entry (pre-randomization, unless already collected after sorafenib progression but within 3 months of enrollment and no systemic anticancer therapies received) Exclusion Criteria: - Prior systemic treatment for advanced liver cancer other than sorafenib-including therapy - Prior local therapy within 2 weeks of starting the study treatment - Presence of main portal vein invasion by liver cancer |
Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor), Primary Purpose: Treatment
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Japan | National Cancer Center Hospital | Chuo-ku | Tokyo |
Japan | National Cancer Center Hospital East | Kashiwa | Chiba |
Japan | Kinki University Hospital, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology | Osaka-Sayama | Osaka |
United States | Fox Chase Cancer Center | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Pfizer |
United States, Japan,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Overall Survival (OS) | OS was the duration from date of randomization to date of death due to any cause. For participants who are alive, overall survival was censored at the last contact. Death was determined from adverse event (AE) data where outcome was death or from follow-up contact data where the participant current status was death. | From first randomization to date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 24 months after last participant randomization | No |
Secondary | Time to Tumor Progression (TTP) | TTP was defined as the time from first randomization to date of first documentation of objective tumor progression. If tumor progression data included more than (>) 1 date, the first date was to be used. TTP (in months) was calculated as first event date or last known progression-free date minus the first randomization date plus 1 divided by 30.4. Tumor progression was determined from oncologic assessment data (where data meet the criteria for progressive disease per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors [RECIST] version 1.1). | Screening and every 8 weeks by calendar thereafter, up to 24 months after last participant randomization. | No |
Secondary | Progression-Free Survival (PFS) | PFS was defined as the time from randomization to first documentation of objective tumor progression or to death due to any cause, whichever occured first. If tumor progression data included >1 date, the first date was to be used. PFS (in months) was calculated as first event date minus first randomization date plus 1 divided by 30.4. | Screening and every 8 weeks by calendar thereafter, up to 24 months after last participant randomization. | No |
Secondary | Objective Response Rate (ORR) - Percentage of Participants With Objective Response | ORR was defined as the proportion of participants with confirmed complete response (CR) or confirmed partial response (PR) according to RECIST version 1.1, relative to all randomized participants. CR were those that persisted on repeat imaging study more than or equal to (>=) 4 weeks after initial documentation of response. PR was defined as >=30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions and non CR/non PD to non-target lesions. Participants who did not have on study radiographic tumor re-evaluation or who died, progressed or dropped out for any reason prior to reaching a CR or PR were to be counted as non-responders in the assessment of ORR. A participant who initially met the criteria for a PR and then subsequently became a confirmed CR, was to be assigned a best response of CR. | Screening and every 8 weeks by calendar thereafter, up to 24 months after last participant randomization. | No |
Secondary | Duration of Response (DR) | DR was defined as the time from the first documentation of objective tumor response to the first documentation of objective tumor progression or to death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. If tumor progression data included >1 date, the first date was to be used. DR (in months) was calculated as the end date for DR minus date of first CR or PR that was subsequently confirmed plus 1 divided by 30.4. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions and non-target, if any. PR was defined as >=30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions and non CR/non PD to non-target lesions. | From first randomization to date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 24 months after last participant randomization | No |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Disease Control Rate (DCR) at 16 Weeks | DCR was defined as the proportion of participants with confirmed CR or confirmed PR or a best response of stable disease (SD) >=16 weeks according to RECIST, relative to all randomized participants. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions. PR was defined as >=30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions and non CR/non PD to non-target lesions. SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for progressive disease (PD), taking as reference the smallest sum diameters while on study. | From first randomization to date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 24 months after last participant randomization | No |
Secondary | Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Hepatobiliary Questionnaire (FACT-Hep) | Patient reported outcomes (PROs) were assessed using the FACT-Hep. The FACT-Hep included the FACT-general (FACT-G) and a hepatobiliary module, it consisted of the 27-item FACT-G, which assessed generic health-related quality of life (HRQoL) concerns, and the 18-item hepatobiliary subscale (HS), which assessed disease-specific issues. The questionnaire used a 5 point Likert scale from '0' "not at all" to '4' "very much" regarding how much each item was present in the last 7 days; lower score indicated severer symptom. Eight of the items (lack of energy, pain, weight loss, back pain, fatigue, stomach pain/discomfort, nausea, and jaundice) made up the Fact Hepatobiliary Symptom Index (FHSI 8) were considered to be symptoms specific to hepatobiliary cancer. | Screening, Cycle 1 Day1,8; Cycle >=2 Day1; End of treatment, survival follow-up up to 24 months after last participant randomization. | No |
Secondary | Maximum Serum Concentration (Cmax) | 1 hour (after start of infusion) on Day1 of Cycles 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 | No | |
Secondary | Trough Serum Concentration of PF-03446962 (Ctrough) | 0 hour (predose) on Day 1 of Cycles 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 | No | |
Secondary | Number of Participants With Human Anti-Human Antibodies (HAHA) | Cycle 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 Day 1 at 0 hour (pre-dose) | No | |
Secondary | Presence of Sensitivity Signature | Tumor molecular characteristics including but not limited to transcriptomic (RNA) signatures of sensitivity | Cycle 1 Day 1 (before infusion), Cycle 4 Day 1 (before infusion), at disease progression/participant withdrawal. | No |
Secondary | Ratio to Baseline of Serum Circulating Protein Concentration | Protein involved TGFB1, VEGF-A, VEGF-C, PIGF, Endoglin, BMP-9, VEGFR1, VEGFR2, VEGFr3, Ang-2, VEGF-D, CD54, CD106, and CCL2. Tumor molecular characteristics including but not limited to transcriptomic (ribonucleic acid) signatures of efficacy. | Cycle 1 Day 1 (before infusion), Cycle 4 Day 1 (before infusion), at disease progression/participant withdrawal. | No |
Secondary | Observed Serum Concentration of Circulating Protein | Cycle 1 Day 1 (before infusion), Cycle 4 Day 1 (before infusion), at disease progression/participant withdrawal. | No |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT03289533 -
A Study Of Avelumab In Combination With Axitinib In Advanced HCC (VEGF Liver 100)
|
Phase 1 | |
Terminated |
NCT01141478 -
Proton Radiotherapy Plus Sorafenib Versus Sorafenib for Patients With HCC Exceeding San Francisco Criteria
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05580835 -
PET / MR With PSMA for Diagnosis and Staging of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT05389527 -
Pembrolizumab and Lenvatinib for Resectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma
|
Phase 2 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT04560751 -
TACE Combined With Lenvatinib for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma (Prolong)
|
||
Withdrawn |
NCT02939807 -
A Phase II Study of ABC294640 as Monotherapy in Patients With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT01915602 -
Refametinib in Combination With Sorafenib in RAS Mutant Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC)
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT04970212 -
Safety and Effectiveness of BioTraceIO Lite for Tissue Damage Assessment Following Liver Tissue Ablation Procedures
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT02403544 -
Phase I Study of Image-Guided Radiation Concurrent With Double-Agent Chemotherapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT01897038 -
A Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics Study of Onartuzumab as Single Agent or in Combination With Sorafenib in Participants With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma
|
Phase 1 | |
Terminated |
NCT01337492 -
Pilot Study Sorafenib as Bridge to Orthotopic Liver Transplantation (OLT)
|
Phase 0 | |
Completed |
NCT01003015 -
Safety Study of BAY73-4506 in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma
|
Phase 2 | |
Terminated |
NCT01020812 -
Combination SBRT With TACE for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT01012011 -
Regulatory Post Marketing Surveillance Study on Nexavar®
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00559455 -
Phase II Study of Eloxatin+5-FU/LV in Patients With Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT00384800 -
A Phase II Study of Tegafur/Uracil (UFUR®)Plus Thalidomide for the Treatment of Advanced or Metastatic Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC)
|
Phase 2 | |
Terminated |
NCT00582400 -
A Phase II Protocol of Arsenic Trioxide (Trisenox) in Subjects With Advanced Primary Carcinoma of the Liver
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT00056992 -
Testing of ADI-PEG in Hepatocellular Carcinoma
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT02859324 -
A Safety and Efficacy Study of CC-122 in Combination With Nivolumab in Subjects With Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC)
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Terminated |
NCT02439008 -
Early Biomarkers of Tumor Response in High Dose Hypofractionated Radiotherapy Word Package 3 : Immune Response
|
N/A |