Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT02661724
Other study ID # IRB00054201
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date April 2015
Est. completion date September 30, 2019

Study information

Verified date September 2019
Source Johns Hopkins University
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Persons with burn-related pain remain under treated and do not have access to comprehensive burn pain management. We seek to extend evidence-based cognitive behavioral pain management strategies to a group of burn survivors that are currently under treated for for burn pain with a specific goal of reducing pain related interference in life activities.

Investigators will conduct a randomized controlled trial to test the central hypothesis that a computer-based cognitive-behavioral program (Take Charge of Burn Pain) will improve pain management, psychological health, and improve participation in burn survivors. Specific aims include: 1) to determine the efficacy of a web-based self-management intervention in reducing pain and pain-related interference and increasing pain management self-efficacy; and 2) to determine whether Take Charge of Burn Pain improves psychological health and participation in life activities in persons with burn injury pain. Emerging research suggests that web-based pain management interventions may be a feasible and effective alternative to clinic-based interventions for patients with mobility and geographic restrictions, such as those treated at tertiary burn centers.


Description:

Burns are among the most painful of all injuries requiring painful daily wound care and rehabilitation procedures. Despite the best efforts of burn care professionals, burns frequently result in acute and chronic suffering and poor functional outcomes for otherwise healthy individuals with many years of productive life remaining. The evidence base directing burn pain management is generally weak, with much work based on clinical preferences rather than scientific evidence. There is a tremendous need for clinical trials to evaluate and improve the standard of care. While pharmacological treatment options are widely available for burn survivors throughout the emergent, acute, and rehabilitation phases of healing there is limited access to comprehensive pain management. It is critical to establish accessible pain management approaches that address the emotional, cognitive and physical dimensions of the burn pain experience. Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) has proven effective for patients with chronic pain and studies have demonstrated the efficacy of providing tele-rehabilitation CBT services for improving outcomes in persons with disability. However, tele-rehabilitation CBT pain management has not been traditionally offered or studied in persons with burn-related pain. The population of burn survivors has limited access to comprehensive pain management including CBT due to lack of access, financial constraints, and mobility issues that render clinic-based CBT impractical. Innovative rehabilitation interventions and delivery methods are needed to improve pain, functional, psychological and participation outcomes in burn survivors with significant, yet untreated, pain problems.

Investigators propose to conduct a two group randomized controlled trial to test the central hypothesis that web-based CBT will improve pain severity, pain interference, self-efficacy, psychological health and participation in life activities for burn survivors with pain. Emerging research suggests that tele-rehabilitation may be a feasible, and effective alternative (with much broader applicability) to clinic-based interventions for patients with access restrictions. This project will address 2 specific aims:

Specific Aim 1: To determine the efficacy of a web-based, CBT self-management intervention (Take Charge of Burn Recovery - Pain [TCBR-Pain) in improving pain management self-efficacy, and reducing pain and pain-related interference in burn survivors with pain.

Outcomes will be measured using a battery of standardized tests at baseline, 2 month (treatment completion) and 5 month post-treatment follow-up. Self-reported pain self-efficacy, pain severity and pain interference will be measured using validated instruments (Pain Self-efficacy Scale, Brief Pain Inventory respectively).

Hypothesis 1: TCBR- Pain participants will demonstrate significantly greater improvement in pain self-efficacy, pain severity and pain interference relative to the attention-control group at 2 month (treatment completion) and 5 month follow up.

Specific Aim 2: To determine the efficacy of a web-based, CBT self-management intervention ((Take Charge of Burn Recovery - Pain [TCBR - Pain]) for improving psychological health and participation in life activities for burn survivors with pain.

Outcomes will be measured using a battery of standardized tests at baseline, 2 month (treatment completion) and 5 month follow-up. Self-reported depression and anxiety, and participation in life activities will be measured using validated instruments (PHQ-9 Depression Scale and PCL -Civilian Anxiety Scale, and the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Scales [WHODAS-II]) respectively.

Hypothesis 2: TCBR- Pain participants will demonstrate significantly greater improvement in depressive and anxiety symptoms and participation relative to the attention-control group at 2 month (treatment completion) and 5 month follow up.

This initial randomized trial will provide critical data on recruitment and retention as well as effect sizes and sample sizes for in the next stage of research - a multi-center, clinical trial which will determine scalability of the intervention. In the proposed study, we will consent 256 burn survivors with pain and randomly assign them to the intervention or control group. After informed oral consent is obtained, potential participants will be screened for eligibility. If eligible, (see inclusion/exclusion criteria below) participants will be consented and will complete the baseline assessment on-line. Once the web-based assessment is complete, the participants will be randomly assigned to either the web-based 7 lesson TCBR - Pain program or the 7 lesson Attention Control -Education group. Randomization will occur in balanced blocks to stratify group composition by pain level, self-reported Total Burn Surface Area, and time since initial burn injury. Participants will complete the post-intervention assessment at 2 months and again at 5 months to assess pain severity, pain interference, psychological health, and participation in life activities. Participants who obtain other treatments while enrolled in the study will be included and these other interventions will be documented and controlled in analyses if necessary. Findings from this study will support future research and dissemination efforts to improve the pain management, psychological health and life participation of patients following burn injury through innovative rehabilitation interventions and delivery methods.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 137
Est. completion date September 30, 2019
Est. primary completion date September 30, 2019
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years to 70 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

1. Persons ages 18 to 70 years old having experienced a burn injury requiring hospitalization at least 6 months prior to enrollment;

2. Reporting a pain severity score on the Brief Pain inventory of 4 (0-10) or higher;

3. Reporting pain of at least 3 months duration; and

4. English speaking due to feasibility of providing the web-based intervention only in English at this time.

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Significant neurological or psychiatric condition precluding informed consent.

2. Lack of access to a computer that is connected to the worldwide web.

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Behavioral:
TCBR-Pain
The interactive TCBR-Pain uses programmed learning, skill development and behavioral practice to engage persons with burn pain in self-management of pain and related problems. The TCB-Pain program includes 7 lessons addressing key dimensions of pain management for persons with burn injury. Each session is about 20 minutes and focuses on burn injury recovery and life style education. Sessions begin with a brief self-assessment and in later sessions, the participant is given graphical feedback on their progress. The lessons are narrated and include closed captioning, are animated, and include branching to provide personalized content.

Locations

Country Name City State
United States Johns Hopkins University Baltimore Maryland

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Johns Hopkins University The Phoenix Society for Burn Suvivors

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Change in Pain Severity and Pain-Related Interference The Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) will be used to assess pain severity and establish that the pain intensity inclusion criteria are met. The BPI includes two primary dimensions: pain severity (4 items) and pain interference (7 items), each rated on 0 to 10 scales. 2 and 5 month
Secondary Change in Depression Depression and PTSD Anxiety will be measured using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) . In a psychometric study of the PHQ-9, the instrument demonstrated acceptable test-retest reliability and was both sensitive (0.93) and specific (0.89) when compared to a diagnosis of major depression in persons with traumatic injury. 2 and 5 month
Secondary Change in Participation in life activities Participation in life activities will be measured using the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Scales (WHODAS-II) is a 36-item general disability instrument that has been specifically designed to use the ICIDH-2 framework to evaluate the dimensions of disability- activity and participation. 2 and 5 month
Secondary Change in PTSD Anxiety PTSD Checklist-Civilian Version (PCL-C). The PCL-C has demonstrated acceptable test-retest reliability and internal consistency values and good convergent validity with moderate to high correlations with other PTSD instruments and measures of anxiety and depression in persons with traumatic injury. Studies have also found that trauma survivors with PCL-C scores = 45 have a greater than 75% probability of developing symptoms consistent with a diagnosis of PTSD. 2 and 5 month