View clinical trials related to Bowel Preparation.
Filter by:Enhanced instructions such as re-education by telephone or short message which increase the patient adherence eventually improve the quality of bowel preparation significantly. However, the effect of family assistance which plays an essential role on compliance of patient with treatment on bowel preparation is unknown. The investigators hypothesized that reinforced education giving family members of outpatients will enhance family support to patients for colonoscopy, and consequently improve the quality of bowel preparation. Therefore, the investigators designed protocols to reinforce family member education by verbal (face to face or telephone) and written methods. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of reinforced family member education on patient compliance and the quality of bowel preparation for colonoscopy. In addition，the rate of side effects happening, the subjective feelings of bowel preparation, the outcomes of colonoscopy ,and the independent risk factors will be also assessed.
It is estimated that there are about 1.4 million patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) worldwide, with a rising trend in CRC incidence in many Asian Pacific countries. In Hong Kong, colorectal cancer ranks first in cancer incidence and second in cancer mortality based on data from 2014. CRC is one of the most preventable cancers because its development in general follows an adenoma-carcinoma sequence. Adenomas are considered precursor lesions for CRC. Recent guidelines from USA, Europe and Asia Pacific region recommend CRC screening for average-risk asymptomatic individuals starting at age 50. Modalities such as guaiac-based fecal occult blood tests (gFOBT), fecal immunochemical tests (FIT), flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS), and colonoscopy are among the acceptable options for CRC screening. While early detection and removal of colorectal adenoma by screening colonoscopy with polypectomy reduce CRC incidence and mortality, interval cancers (cancers that develop after a colonoscopy and before the next scheduled colonoscopy) may still occur and were reported to account for up to 10.5% of CRC. a CRC has been associated with proximal colon location, small lesion, flat lesion, missed lesion, inadequate examination, incomplete resection of lesion, tumor biology, and low adenoma detection rate (ADR). High ADR (eg, ≥ 20%) has been associated with a reduced risk of interval CRC. Bowel preparation includes diet restriction and proper use of laxative before the colonoscopy, and this is one of the important factors to ensure a high quality colonoscopy. Suboptimal bowel preparation may lead to decreased ADR, cecal intubation rate, and surveillance interval and increased procedural time. Efforts to improve bowel cleansing quality through traditional communication routines, including face-to-face verbal education, written booklet or visual aids or telephone-based re-instruction have proven to be useful. A recent study using WeChat, a widely used social media mobile app in China, has also shown to be effectively improving bowel preparation level of a mixed population who received diagnostic (77%), screening (15.8%) and surveillance (7.2%) colonoscopy. However, the impact of social media mobile app on the bowel preparation level of screening colonoscopy is not yet known. Hence, this study will investigate the effectiveness of the most popular social media app worldwide, WhatsApp in bowel preparation level of screening colonoscopy.
This Clinical Trial is being conducted to study the effect of oral simethicone on the presence of bubbles during colonoscopy. The purpose of this study is to find out what effects (good and bad) the addition of oral simethicone to bowel preparation has on the ability to visualize the colon mucosa (bowel) during colonoscopy.
The investigators will investigate the safety and efficacy of low-volume preparation (Oral Sulfate solution) compared to 4L PEG solution in bowel preparation before colonoscopy. One aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of low-volume preparation (Oral Sulfate solution) on bowel preparation before colonoscopy.
Poor or inadequate bowel preparation is one of the most common reasons for a repeated or failed colonoscopy. Preparation methods shown to be effective include the use of either bowel-cleansing devices or oral laxatives. Despite the acceptable effectiveness and safety of both bowel-cleansing methods, very few studies have been performed to evaluate which method is more effective. The main aim is to perform an observational study followed by propensity score modeling to evaluate and compare the quality of bowel preparation with the use of Aquanet bowel-cleansing devices versus the use of oral Sodium picosulfate solution. The study will involve 314 patients requiring a colonoscopy, between 14 and 90 years of age and with more than three bowel movements per week for the past one month. Outcomes of interest being the quality of bowel preparation evaluated through the Boston Bowel Preparation (BBP) scale. The investigator hypothesized that the bowel preparation with Aquanet bowel-cleansing device for colonoscopy will provide a better outcome for the patient than with conventional methods.
The purpose of this study is to compare the Sodium Picosulfate, Magnesium Oxide and Anhydrous Citric Acid Oral Solution with PREPOPIK® for colon cleansing in adult subjects undergoing colonoscopy.
The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy depending on the order of the sequential combination method using sodium picosulfate and magnesium citrate (PMC) and PEG with ascorbic acid for bowel preparation. The investigators designed this study as a phase II prospective randomized parallel arm clinical trial. 71 participant will be enrolled in each group (142 in total). The primary outcome is the efficacy of bowel preparation. secondary outcomes are tolerability, side effect of the drugs, polyp detection rate and adenoma detection rate.
This is a multi-centre randomized clinical trial comparing the efficacy of two different bowel preparation regimens for patients who have already failed a bowel preparation for colonoscopy.
The purpose of this study is to determine optimal time intervals for preparation before colonoscopy using different formulas.
The study compares the efficacy of bowel preparation between the face-to-face re-education(FFRE group) and normal education (no-FFRE group) in patients.