View clinical trials related to Back Pain.
Filter by:The purpose of the study is to compare the effect of positional release technique and manual pressure technique of hip flexors on pain, range of motion, lumbosacral angle and disability in patients with chronic low back pain
Chronic low back pain, which individuals have difficulty coping with in the modern age and is one of the most common reasons for applying to health institutions, has important consequences for individuals and society. Approximately 80% of individuals experience low back pain throughout their lives, and 10-20% become chronic. Low back pain causes varying degrees of restrictions in individuals' daily living activities, modification or reduction of movements due to pain. This situation causes the pain to continue and causes the functional level to decrease in individuals with low back pain. There are many approaches to the treatment of chronic low back pain, and among these, exercise treatments have been shown to be effective in reducing pain and improving functionality. Spinal stabilization exercises, which have an important place among current exercise approaches for chronic low back pain, ensure the formation of a neutral position in the spine by activating the core muscles consisting of multifidus, transversus abdominis, diaphragm and pelvic floor muscles. Perception of neutral position is provided and applied in daily living activities. In this way, pain is reduced and functionality increases by providing appropriate loading. What kind of changes occur in the core muscles due to the strengthening of the core muscles as a result of spinal stabilization exercises is an important question that needs to be clarified scientifically. It is possible to observe the mechanical changes occurring in the core muscles with shear wave elastography, which has been frequently used in clinical research and practice in recent years. However, in the detailed literature review, no scientific studies were found that evaluated what level of exercise intensity produces optimal changes in the muscle and the correlation of these changes with pain and functional improvement. In this study, where different intensities of exercise will be applied, the mechanical changes occurring in the core muscles before and after exercise will be evaluated with shear wave elastography and the aim is to evaluate the correlation of these changes with pain and pain
This clinical trial with 276 patients with subacute or chronic back pain aims to investigate the effectiveness of the unguided digital therapeutic relevis for patients with subacute or chronic back pain. Inclusion criteria are: age ≥ 18 years, presence of subacute (6-12 weeks) or chronic (>12 weeks) back pain, attested by a medical certificate (relevant ICD-10-GM diagnoses: M47.8x, M47.9x, M54.5, M54.8x, M54.9x, M51.0x, M51.1x, M51.2), impaired functional ability [Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) ≥ 21], consent to participation, sufficient knowledge of the German language. Exclusion criteria are: change in treatment of back pain in the past month, planned change in treatment of back pain in the next 3 months, prior use of other online programs/apps for back pain, history of back, hip or knee surgery in the past 6 months, history of more than one back surgery in lifetime, presence of a specific cause for back pain (e.g., fracture, infection, neuropathies [except when due to disc prolapse], axial spondyloarthritis), tumor or metastases, cauda equina syndrome, acute myocardial infarction, unstable coronary heart disease/angina pectoris or heart failure, acute thrombosis, manifest osteoporosis, acute fevers, rheumatic autoimmune diseases. Patients will be randomized and allocated to either an intervention group in a 1:1 ratio, in which they will receive access to relevis in addition to treatment as usual (TAU, n = 138), or to a control group, in which they will receive only TAU (n = 138). TAU is defined as any therapy prescribed or recommended by the GP or specialists (e. g. orthopedic surgeon, rheumatologists etc.) which may include physiotherapy, injections in the spine, drug therapy, orthesis, etc. (1,2). The primary endpoint will be the functional impairment, measured by the ODI, with three months post-allocation being the primary time point for assessment of effectiveness (T1). Six months post-allocation (T2) will be used as the follow-up assessment endpoint. Secondary endpoints will be depression, work and social functioning, pain intensity, and health-related quality of life.
The goal is to undertake a Decentralized Randomized Pilot Feasibility study to inform the methods for a definitive Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) (including recruitment success, participant experience, intervention delivery, safety, outcome measurement and sample size estimation). The main question is if the methods used are feasible for an adequately powered future RCT. Participants will be randomly allocated to receive either: Intervention - OldPain2Go® treatment or Placebo Control - Jacobson's progressive relaxation
There are many conservative treatment methods for the treatment of mechanical low back pain and they continue to be developed. The aim of this study is to examine the effects of inspiratory muscle training, which can be added to these treatment methods, on muscle endurance, functional capacity, pain intensity, disability, quality of life and sleep quality in people with mechanical low back pain.
The purpose of this study is to investigate specific clinical characteristics, amongst those with low back pain, that identify patient appropriateness for Intermuscular Dry-Needling (IMDN) and to develop a prediction tool that can be used by clinicians.
The goal of this investigation is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the LumbaCure® device in elderly people suffering from low back pain. The study is being carried out at several sites, in nursing homes, in order to reach the elderly patients most at risk of a sedentary lifestyle.
Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is defined as low back pain lasting longer than three months. CLBP is one of the most common and expensive diseases in terms of both labour loss and treatment costs, and it is very important to treat it with conventional (non-surgical) treatment methods. Clinical guidelines recommend active treatments that address psychosocial factors and focus on functional improvement. Within this approach, low back protection training, called low back school, is recognised as an effective and economical method. This study was planned to investigate the effectiveness of lumbar school training or core stabilisation exercises on pain, mobilisation and quality of life in patients with chronic low back pain. In this research, patients coming to Seydişehir State Hospital physiotherapy unit will be included in the study. Patients will be taken in Seydişehir Vocational School of Health Services Vocational School vocational skills laboratory and Seydişehir State Hospital physiotherapy unit. As a result of the power analysis, 64 patients are planned to be included. Simple randomisation will be used. Sealed opaque envelopes will be prepared by the research team. Opaque envelopes will be determined as 32 (core exercise group) and 32 (B) (lumbar school). The pain intensity of the patients will be determined by the Visual Analogue Scale, which is a self-report scale, and the functional disability levels will be determined by the Oswestry Disability Index and the quality of life levels will be determined by the World Health Organization Quality of Life Module (WHOQOL-BREF) and spinal mobility will be determined by measuring the hand-finger ground distance. Patients will be divided into two groups as core exercise group and lumbar school training group and will be evaluated before and after treatment and training. Keywords: Chronic low back pain, back school, core stabilisation exercise
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare between the effect of positional release technique and cognitive behavioral therapy in patients with chronic non specific low back pain. The main question aims to answer :Is there any differences of using positional release techniques versus cognitive behavioral therapy on patients with chronic low back pain?
Evaluation of a bloodletting acupuncture at the fossa poplitea in comparison to bloodletting acupuncture at the regio glutaea and a waiting list control group in patients with subacute and chronic non-specific pain low back pain.