View clinical trials related to Arthritis.
Filter by:Evaluating the effect of the flavonoids combination (diosmin and hesperidin) as adjuvant therapy on patients with rheumatoid arthritis
This study relies on the use of a smartphone application (SOMA) that the investigators developed for tracking daily mood, pain, and activity status in acute pain, chronic pain, and healthy controls over four months.The primary goal of the study is to use fluctuations in daily self-reported symptoms to identify computational predictors of acute-chronic pain transition, pain recovery, and/or chronic pain maintenance or flareups. The general study will include anyone with current acute or chronic pain, while a smaller sub-study will use a subset of patients from the chronic pain group who have been diagnosed with chronic low back pain, failed back surgery syndrome, or fibromyalgia. These sub-study participants will first take part in one in-person EEG testing session while completing simple interoception and reinforcement learning tasks and then begin daily use of the SOMA app. Electrophysiologic and behavioral data from the EEG testing session will be used to determine predictors of treatment response in the sub-study.
The study will reveal the transcriptomic signature linked to the aberrant activation of B lymphocytes in RA identifying novel molecular potential targets for inflammation resolution and immune tolerance promotion. The combination with B lymphocytes phenotyping will dissect the impact of the identified genes on B lymphocyte maturation and activation in RA. Moreover, in vitro study on B lymphocyte cultures using selective JAK1 inhibition will reveal, at deeper level, its transcriptomic effect on RA B lymphocytes activation profile and phenotype, providing the discovery of new biomarkers of the loss of immunological tolerance, active disease and long lasting disease remission.
This study seeks to compare two methods of trapeziectomy for basilar thumb arthritis. The first is trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition, which means removing the trapezium bone and filling the void with a tendon graft. This is the most commonly used procedure and the control group. The experimental group is trapeziectomy with suture tape suspension of the 1st metacarpal to the 2nd metacarpal. This is using a device called the InternalBrace, produced by Arthrex.
The purpose the research is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of injection of adipose allograft matrix (AAM) to the small joints of the hand for treatment of early stage osteoarthritis. The hypothesis is that use of AAM injected directly into the joint will show improvements in pain and disability while providing a safe, off-the-shelf alternative which can obviate the need for, and risks associated with, current treatment options with autologous fat transfer. As standard of care, routine strength, pain scale scores (VAS) and range of motion will be recorded, a baseline disability survey (DASH score) will also be administered. After these have all been recorded and administered in a separate visit the patient will undergo the lipofilling procedure. The subject population will include patients over the age of 18 who present with joint pain of the hand with radiographic evidence of osteoarthritis.
Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common type of arthritis, characterized by pain and physical disability. More than 10% of persons > 55 years have symptomatic OA, primarily involving the knees. Knee arthroplasty is considered a successful orthopaedic procedure in progressed knee OA (KOA) with severe pain and disability where non-surgical treatments have been tried. It has long been recognized that injury to the body, either from trauma or surgery causes an inflammatory response. As TKA is considered a more invasive procedure compared with UKA, TKA and UKA may not trigger inflammatory reactions of the same magnitude. Differences in inflammatory response between TKA and UKA could help explain why differences in outcome are present, despite both procedures being technically successful. Even though knee arthroplasty is a very common and successful procedure, there are no existing studies comparing the invasiveness of TKA and UKA. As morbidity and mortality rates differ between the groups, the aim of this prospective cohort study is to investigate whether the post-operative inflammatory responses differ between TKA and UKA, and secondarily whether this difference can explain the difference in outcome between the two procedures. The investigators hypothesize that TKA generates a larger postoperative systemic inflammatory response compared with UKA due to more extensive periarticular soft tissue and bone trauma. The study's primary outcome is C-reactive Protein (CRP) measured in blood 24 hours after surgery (22-26 hours after surgery ~ day 1). Participants which are candidates for either a TKA or a UKA will through serial blood test measurement have their postoperative systemic inflammatory response measured. This further will be correlated to the clinical and functional outcomes over a 2-years postoperative follow-up period.
The goal of this observational study is to learn about functional and patient reported outcomes in patient undergoing total wrist replacement with the KinematX total wrist replacement study. The main questions it aims to answer are: - What is the range of motion (flexion, extension, radial, ulnar, grip and pinch strength) at 3-, 6-, and 12-months after surgery and yearly up to 10 years among patients having total wrist replacement with the KinematX implant. - What are the patient reported outcomes (PROMIS, PRWE, HSS wrist expectations) at 3-, 6-, and 12-months after surgery and yearly up to 10 years among patients having total wrist replacement with the KinematX implant. - How do range of motion and patient reported outcomes change over the 10 years after total wrist replacement surgery? Participants will be followed according to standard of care and preoperative and post-operative information for up to 10 years after surgery will be collected and entered into an electronic data base. Patients are eligible to enroll into the registry before or after they have had their wrist replacement surgery.
This study is a pilot, proof of concept study to determine the effects of administering an oral short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) supplement to Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) patients with inadequate response to methotrexate (MTX). The study will include up to 35 participants to obtain a sample size of at least 25 participants taking the oral supplement. The researchers hypothesize that oral SCFA will change the participants' gut microbiome and regulatory immune responses. Clinical data to assess for adverse events, stool, urine samples and peripheral blood will be collected at baseline, 1 month, and with an optional 2 month time-point. Fecal microbiome will be analyzed. Adaptive immune responses will be analyzed from participant blood samples.
Population Patients with a diagnosis of Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA), moderate or high clinical disease activity (CDAI>10) despite conventional synthetic (cs)DMARD(s) therapy for ≥3 months, naïve to biological (b) and targeted synthetic (ts)DMARDs therapy and a maximum of 2 swollen joints (out of 44 joints) Study design Randomised multicentre, parallel-arm clinical study Primary objective Non-inferiority of the experimental arm (i.e. clinical therapy together with ultrasound guided treatment decision) in comparison to the control arm (clinically guided decision) concerning the proportion of patients reaching low disease activity (CDAI ≤10) and a minimal clinical important improvement (MCII: improvement of ≥6 points if starting from moderate disease activity, any case starting from high disease activity and achieving low disease activity) or remission according to ACR/EULAR index-based remission criteria (CDAI ≤2.8/Boolean remission) at week 24. Intervention This is a randomised multicentre, national, parallel-arm clinical study. Patients with a diagnosis of RA, moderate or high clinical disease activity (CDAI>10) despite conventional synthetic (cs)DMARD(s) therapy for ≥3 months, naïve to biological (b) and targeted synthetic (ts)DMARDs therapy and a maximum of 2 swollen joints (out of 44 joints) will be included and randomized to one of the following two strategic arms: 1. Clinical decision strategy: All patients receive a TNF-alpha blocker while continuing background csDMARD(s) therapy. If a CDAI ≤10 is not achieved after 12 weeks, patients are switched to a bDMARD or tsDMARD. The decision on which b/tsDMARD to use at week 12 is at the discretion of the investigator. 2. Clinical plus ultrasound-based decision strategy. All patients in this group will be evaluated by ultrasound at 44 joints. In case of clinically-verified plus ultrasound verified inflammation, patients will receive a TNF-alpha blocker while continuing background csDMARD(s) therapy. If a CDAI ≤10 is not achieved after 12 weeks, patients are again evaluated by ultrasound at 44 joints. In case clinically-verified plus ultrasound-verified inflammation is present, patients are switched to a bDMARD or tsDMARD. The decision on which b/tsDMARD to use is at the discretion of the investigator. In case clinically-verified plus ultrasound-verified inflammation is absent, patients receive step-up pain therapy while background csDMARD(s) will be continued. Sample size 110 patients Time plan - Total duration of the study: 42 months - Active phase for each patient: 48 weeks (24 weeks for the interventional treatment strategy and 24 weeks for follow-up visit) - Recruitment: 30 months
With this pilot study, the acute side effects and potential pain relieve after radiotherapy (RT) of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) are prospectively recorded. For this purpose, the symptoms of the jaw joint arthrosis/arthritis are recorded using a symptom-oriented questionnaire and the numeric rating scale for pain assessment. Furthermore, it is examined whether the irradiation is feasible.