View clinical trials related to Arteriovenous Fistula.
Filter by:Use of arteriovenous fistula for IV drug administration is controversial and often prohibited by nephrologists. However, we have been using this method in our department for years now in order to keep the patients 'veins for other fistulas in the future. The aim of this study is to evaluate our practice and maybe provide a justification for a larger multi-center study given the importance of this subject in patients with chronic renal failure.
Infiltrations from cannulation difficulties result in significant morbidity including loss of vascular access (VA) loss in hemodialysis (HD). Cannulation is reliant on personnel skill and VA characteristics. Surface marking of VA lacks real-time information and traditional ultrasound (US) devices are large, expensive and require skilled operator expertise. Sonic Window© (Analogic Ultrasound, Peabody, MA) is a coronal mode ultrasound device (CMUD) approved for VA cannulation. Study is a single center randomized, prospective pilot study comparing handheld US-guided cannulation of new arteriovenous fistula (AVF) to standard cannulation practices.
The aim of this phase 1 study is to determine the role of autologous adipose derived mesenchymal stem cells in the reduction of hemodialysis arteriovenous fistula failure when applied during the time of surgical creation.
The primary objective of this double-blind study is to compare the frequency of primary patency at 6 months in patients with stenosis of arteriovenous fistula (AVF) treated either by conventional angioplasty + angioplasty with balloon impregnated with paclitaxel or by conventional angioplasty + angioplasty with placebo balloon (balloon not impregnated with paclitaxel). The other objectives of the study are: 1. To compare the frequency of primary patency at 3 months and 12 months. 2. To compare the rate of restenosis > 50% at the site of angioplasty at 3, 6 and 12 months. 3. To compare, at 3, 6 and 12 months, the proportion of patients with arteriovenous fistula deteriorating back to preoperative flow rate (within 20% of preoperative flow rate). 4. To compare, at 3, 6 and 12 months, the proportion of AVF with a flow rate < 500 ml / min. 5. To compare, at 3, 6 and 12 months, the cumulative rate of thrombosis. 6. To compare, at 3, 6 and 12 months, the medical costs related to direct medical care, initial treatments, monitoring, diagnosis and treatments of complications.
A prospective longitudinal surveillance for a period of 2 months. Sample - identify suitable Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) patients who undergo HD with functioning AVF. Participants at various age range and both sexes are recruited to observe their access flow, access recirculation and cardiac function and assess their relationship.
The purpose of this Registry is to enroll patients presenting with clinical and hemodynamic abnormalities in native or synthetic (grafts) arteriovenous (AV) fistulae located in the arm. Subjects will be treated with the Lutonix DCB carrying the CE Mark per current IFU and followed clinically for a minimum of 12 months.
The purpose of our study is to compare physical examination alone to color Doppler ultrasonography (CDUS) vascular mapping and physical examination in terms of outcomes of vascular access and long-term patency.
Hemodialysis (HD) vascular access dysfunction is a huge clinical problem which results in significant morbidity amongst patients with End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD), causing a severe economic burden on any health care system. Native arteriovenous fistula (AVF) is the preferred form of permanent dialysis access since it is associated with the best long term outcome as compared to other forms of dialysis access. Despite the clinical benefits, many patients on HD do not have AVF as there dialysis access. One of the reasons for low AVF rates is early fistula failure (EFF). The two most important causes for EFF amenable to intervention are stenosis anywhere in the circuit and/or presence of accessory vein (av). Although management of stenosis is well established with relatively clear guidelines, the management of av lacks clear scientific approach. In a recent study researchers recommended a hemodialysis arteriovenous flow quantification-diameter (HAQ) criteria for accessory vein obliteration. The purpose of this controlled, blinded, prospective trial is to assess the clinical utility of the HAQ criteria as compared to current recommendations for av obliteration.
Hemodialysis (HD) vascular access dysfunction is a huge clinical problem which results in significant clinical morbidity in patients with End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD), causing a severe economic burden on any health care system. Arteriovenous (A-V) dialysis accesses are the preferred form of permanent dialysis access as compared to central venous catheters (CVC) . One of the reasons for CVC use is poor long term patency rates of A-V access. Arteriovenous Grafts (AVG) have a primary patency rates of just under 50% at 12 months and around 33% at 18 months. Native arteriovenous fistula (AVF) are slightly better with primary patency rates of around 60 percent at one year and 51 percent at 2 years. The most common cause for AVF and AVG dysfunction is stenosis development due to neointimal hyperplasia (NIH) within the circuit leading to access thrombosis. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) is the current standard of treatment for these lesions. Despite being the treatment of choice for these lesions patency rates after PTA continue to be dismal. One of the problems with poor long term outcomes after successful intervention is how you assess immediate intervention success. Successful angioplasty is defined by Dialysis Outcome Quality Initiative (DOQI) guidelines as one where only less than 30% residual stenosis remains at the end of intervention. Unfortunately angiographic images post angioplasty correlate poorly with improvement of access flows through the arteriovenous circuit. There are two main problems with these practice standards. First, they are based on a 2-dimensional angiographic view of the lesion which may be misleading. Secondly, this assessment of recoil is very subjective and not base on objective data. Access flow monitoring can now be performed intra-procedurally with thermal dilution technique. Its benefit was shown in a small pilot study. To date there have not been any randomized controlled trials to assess the benefit of such an approach where intervention is based on improvements in access flow at the time of intervention. We hypothesize that such an approach will improve outcomes after interventions related to access dysfunction. This may also identify the right scenarios in which stent placement may benefit thus improving outcomes after stent placement as well.
In recent years the use of paclitaxel releasing percutaneous transluminal angioplastic (PTA) balloon catheter is spreading in vascular pathology, mainly in stenosis infrainguinal arteries. This device combined the mechanical action of PTA balloon with the antiproliferative effects of paclitaxel. The use of these devices in venous pathology is limited. This devices could improve the treatment of renal dialysis arteriovenous fistula stenosis.