View clinical trials related to ARDS, Human.
Filter by:ARDS is a severe disease in ICU, and could induce high mortality. Glycocalyx is an important matrix construction which covers endothelial cells, it could protect endothelial cells injury and the glycocalyx biomarkers could predict pulmonary injury. Decorin is a member of the small leucine-rich proteoglycan (SLRP) family, contains a single glycosaminoglycan (GAG) chain and a core protein with 12 leucine-rich repeats. In the previous study, decorin is associated with cardiac and liver fibrosis, however, the effects of decorin on ARDS pulmonary fibrosis have not been clarified.
To observe the influence of different methods titrating PEEP on right heart function and pulmonary artery pressure in ARDS patients .
This retrospective study characterizes the clinical course and identifies four independent predictors of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) after burn injury (post-burn ARDS; pbARDS). In addition, a clinically useful prognostic score for pbARDS is introduced (ARDS burn score), which was derived from these independent predictors. The newly developed score may be helpful for the development of specific treatment strategies.
Sedation may have many drawbacks in ICU patients: cardiovascular, neurologic, muscular. Light sedation and Pressure Support ventilation is feasible in ARDS patients. However spontaneous breathing can lead to high transpulmonary pressure. The goal of the study is to measure transpulmonary pressure before sedation decrease and after stabilization. The main endpoint is transpulmonary pressure less than 24 cmH2O.
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) is associated with a mortality rate of 30 - 45 % and required invasive mechanical ventilation (MV) in almost 85 % of patients[1]. During controlled MV, driving pressure (i.e., the difference between end-inspiratory and end-expiratory airway pressure) depends of both tidal volume and respiratory system compliance. Either excessive tidal volume or reduced lung aeration may increase the driving pressure. ARDS patients receiving tidal volume of 6 ml/kg predicted body weight (PBW) and having a day-1 driving pressure ≥ 14 cmH2O have an increased risk of death in the hospital[2]. Seemly, in the LUNG SAFE observational cohort, ARDS patients having a day-1 driving pressure < 11 cmH2O had the lowest risk of death in the hospital[1]. Hence, driving pressure acts as a major contributor of mortality in ARDS, and probably reflects excessive regional lung distension resulting in pro-inflammatory and fibrotic biological processes. Whether decreasing the driving pressure by an intervention change mortality remains an hypothesis; but one of means is to decrease the tidal volume from 6 to 4 ml/ kg predicted body weight (PBW). However, this strategy promotes hypercarbia, at constant respiratory rate, by decreasing the alveolar ventilation. In this setting, implementing an extracorporeal CO2 removal (ECCO2R) therapy prevents from hypercarbia. A number of low-flow ECCO2R devices are now available and some of those use renal replacement therapy (RRT) platform. The investigators previously reported that combining a membrane oxygenator (0.65 m²) within a hemofiltration circuit provides efficacious low flow ECCO2R and blood purification in patients presenting with both ARDS and Acute Kidney injury[3]. This study aims to investigate the efficacy of an original ECCO2R system combining a 0.67 m² membrane oxygenator (Lilliput 2, SORIN) inserted within a specific circuit (HP-X, BAXTER) and mounted on a RRT monitor (PrismafleX, BAXTER). Such a therapy only aims to provide decarboxylation but not blood purification and has the huge advantage to be potentially implemented in most ICUs without requiring a specific ECCO2R device. The study will consist in three periods: - The first period will address the efficacy of this original ECCO2R system at tidal volume of 6 and 4 ml/kg PBW using an off-on-off design. - The second part will investigate the effect of varying the sweep gas flow (0-2-4-6-8-10 l/min) and the mixture of the sweep gas (Air/O2) on the CO2 removal rate. - The third part will compare three ventilatory strategies applied in a crossover design: 1. Minimal distension: Tidal volume 4 ml/kg PBW and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) based on the ARDSNet PEEP/FiO2 table (ARMA). 2. Maximal recruitment: 4 ml/kg PBW and PEEP adjusted to maintain a plateau pressure between 23 - 25 cmH2O. 3. Standard: Tidal volume 6 ml/kg and PEEP based on the ARDSNet PEEP/FiO2 table (ARMA).
Catheter colonization, catheter-associated infection and catheter-associated bacteremia are a major challenge for resuscitation unit. This study wishes to explore the impact of the central venous catheter colonization on the ARDS patient with and without prone position.
During One-lung ventilation, the use of lower tidal volumes (VT) is helpful to avoid over-distension, provide sufficient oxygenation, but can result in increased atelectasis. Nevertheless, it is not known if, during one-lung ventilation with constant low VT, moderate levels of PEEP combined with lung recruitment maneuvers are superior to variable low tidal volume for intraoperative oxygenation and protection against PPCs. Aim of the study is to compare a strategy using constant tidal volume with recruitment maneuvers versus variable tidal volume with recruitment maneuvers during thoracic surgery in adults. We hypothesize that in adult, non-obese patients undergoing thoracic surgery under standardized OLV with variable tidal volumes, modearte PEEP and recruitment maneuvers as compared to constant without recruitment maneuvers prevent PPCs. Patients will be randomly assigned to one of two groups: FIX TIDAL VOLUME GROUP (Groupfix): mechanical ventilation with constant (6 ml/kgIBW) tidal volume and PEEP of 5 cmH2O with recruitment maneuvers VARIABLE TIDAL VOLUME GROUP (Groupvar): mechanical ventilation with variable (6 ml/kgIBW ± 33%) tidal volume with variable respiratory rate to maintain constant minute ventilation and PEEP of 5 cmH2O with recruitment maneuvers.
Pathophysiological changes influenced by multiple factors in critically ill patients, has a significant impact on pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of cisatracurium. In order to understand better and find an appropriate dosing regimen, the purpose of this study is to investigate the PK and PD of a loading dose cisatracurium in critically ill patients. Cisatracurium, nondepolarizing neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs), are commonly used in intensive care units because of a lesser effect on hemodynamic parameters and a reduction in mortality rate in ARDS patients. Loading dose recommended in clinical practice guidelines for sustained neuromuscular blockade in the adult critically ill patient is 0.1-0.2 mg/kg. Then, maintenance dose of 1-3 mcg/kg/min is followed regarding indications, such as ARDS. However, this recommended loading dose might not be adequate in critically ill patients, the study in this specific population might be needed.
This is a prospective single-center cohort trial to compare regional bronchial recruitment, bronchial distention and alveolar recruitment in 6 patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). The investigators used CT scan images as the imaging modality, and the subjects were scanned on end-expiratory lung volume with different positive end-expiratory pressures. Those images were post-processed to evaluate the airways.
Expiratory flow limitation (EFL) is defined as a dynamic condition that expiratory flow cannot be further increased with higher expiratory driving pressure. Under mechanical ventilation, it can cause intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and dynamic hyperinflation, and be associated with worse clinical outcome. The detection of EFL however needs special maneuvers and offline analysis of flow-volume curves, which are infeasible in routine practice and cannot be used during real-time monitoring. The investigators propose a new and simple approach using flow derived parameters to detect EFL in real time without needing any intervention.