POOLED Red Blood Cells Prepared From Pooling 5 Leukoreduced, Irradiated RBC Units

Anemia Clinical Trial

— Pooled RBCs  

Official title:

Phase I Clinical Trial of Pooled Red Blood Cells for Transfusion

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Withdrawn

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT03056378
• Other study ID #: NYBC-0088
• Status: Withdrawn
• Phase: Phase 1
• Start date: October 2019
• Est. completion date: June 2021

Study information

• Verified date: December 2019
• Source: New York Blood Center
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The purpose of the study is to determine the safety of pooled red blood cells (RBCs) compared to standard leukoreduced RBC products stored in additive solution. The primary objective is to determine if there is no significant difference in transfusion associated adverse events in POOLED-RBCs compared to standard RBC product groups. Secondarily to determine if there are no significant differences in new antibody and new positive direct antiglobulin test (DAT) formation in the POOLED-RBCs compared to standard RBC product groups.

Description:

This research study is enrolling subjects who are receiving RBC (red blood cell) blood transfusions as part of their treatment. In this study, we are testing a new way of preparing RBC units (pooled RBC units) for transfusion compared to the standard RBC units. We are testing this because blood transfusions may be associated with side effects that may be harmful. We have developed a new way to process RBC for transfusion to try and reduce some of those side effects.

The pooled RBC units will be made by sterilely pooling five (5) single RBC units into one container where the blood will be mixed together, and then separated into five individual RBC units, ready to be used for transfusion. The purpose of the study is to determine the safety of the blood prepared in this new way compared to standard RBC products.

The primary objective is to determine if there is no significant difference in transfusion associated adverse events in POOLED-RBCs compared to standard RBC product groups. Secondarily to determine if there are no significant differences in new antibody and new positive direct antiglobulin test (DAT) formation in the POOLED-RBCs compared to standard RBC product groups.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Withdrawn
• Enrollment: 0
• Est. completion date: June 2021
• Est. primary completion date: December 2020
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years to 99 Years

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Age>= 18 years

• Hematology/ oncology or other chronic transfusion dependent patients

• Patients who are in need of transfusion due to low hemoglobin level (<8 gm/dl)

• Patients who only require one or two transfusion episode of 1-2 RBC units each during 60 day period

• Currently not planning to be pregnant during the study period

Exclusion Criteria:

• Previously identified alloantibodies (other than to D, C, E and K)

• Positive direct antiglobulin test, currently or within the last year

• Emergency transfusion

• Patients < 18 years old

• Need for specialized products, such as washed

• Patients involved in other RBC transfusion clinical trial

• Currently or planning to be pregnant within the proposed study period

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Anemia
• Transfusion Reaction

Intervention

Biological:
• Standard RBCs
Transfusion of standard pRBCs that are matched for C, E and K

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
United States	Westchester Medical Center/New York Medical College	Valhalla	New York

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
New York Blood Center	Westchester Medical Center

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

References & Publications (16)

Custer B, Agapova M, Martinez RH. The cost-effectiveness of pathogen reduction technology as assessed using a multiple risk reduction model. Transfusion. 2010 Nov;50(11):2461-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2010.02704.x. — View Citation

Daurat A, Roger C, Gris J, Daurat G, Feissel M, Le Manach Y, Lefrant J, Muller L. Apheresis platelets are more frequently associated with adverse reactions than pooled platelets both in recipients and in donors: a study from French hemovigilance data. Transfusion. 2016 Jun;56(6):1295-303. doi: 10.1111/trf.13475. Epub 2016 Jan 26. — View Citation

Hendrickson JE, Hillyer CD. Noninfectious serious hazards of transfusion. Anesth Analg. 2009 Mar;108(3):759-69. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181930a6e. Review. — View Citation

Hess JR; Biomedical Excellence for Safer Transfusion (BEST) Collaborative. Scientific problems in the regulation of red blood cell products. Transfusion. 2012 Aug;52(8):1827-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2011.03511.x. Epub 2012 Jan 9. Review. — View Citation

Lasalle-Williams M, Nuss R, Le T, Cole L, Hassell K, Murphy JR, Ambruso DR. Extended red blood cell antigen matching for transfusions in sickle cell disease: a review of a 14-year experience from a single center (CME). Transfusion. 2011 Aug;51(8):1732-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2010.03045.x. Epub 2011 Feb 18. — View Citation

Levin AE, Williamson PC, Bloch EM, Clifford J, Cyrus S, Shaz BH, Kessler D, Gorlin J, Erwin JL, Krueger NX, Williams GV, Penezina O, Telford SR 4th, Branda JA, Krause PJ, Wormser GP, Schotthoefer AM, Fritsche TR, Busch MP. Serologic screening of United States blood donors for Babesia microti using an investigational enzyme immunoassay. Transfusion. 2016 Jul;56(7):1866-74. doi: 10.1111/trf.13618. Epub 2016 May 25. — View Citation

Levin AE, Williamson PC, Erwin JL, Cyrus S, Bloch EM, Shaz BH, Kessler D, Telford SR 3rd, Krause PJ, Wormser GP, Ni X, Wang H, Krueger NX, Caglioti S, Busch MP. Determination of Babesia microti seroprevalence in blood donor populations using an investigational enzyme immunoassay. Transfusion. 2014 Sep;54(9):2237-44. doi: 10.1111/trf.12763. Epub 2014 Jul 4. — View Citation

Marthur A, Stassinopoulos A, Hess JR, Narla M, Shaz BH. Effects of pooling multiple red blood cell units to improve storage. Blood 2012;120:3437

Mathur A, Chowdhury R, Hillyer CD, Mitchell WB, Shaz BH. Storage characteristics of multiple-donor pooled red blood cells compared to single-donor red blood cell units. Transfusion. 2016 Dec;56(12):2941-2947. doi: 10.1111/trf.13866. Epub 2016 Oct 5. — View Citation

Stramer SL, Notari EP, Krysztof DE, Dodd RY. Hepatitis B virus testing by minipool nucleic acid testing: does it improve blood safety? Transfusion. 2013 Oct;53(10 Pt 2):2449-58. doi: 10.1111/trf.12213. Epub 2013 Apr 23. — View Citation

Sweeney JD, Kouttab NM, Holme S, Kurtis JD, Cheves TA, Nelson EJ. Prestorage pooled whole-blood-derived leukoreduced platelets stored for seven days, preserve acceptable quality and do not show evidence of a mixed lymphocyte reaction. Transfusion. 2004 Aug;44(8):1212-9. — View Citation

Thiele T, Heddle N, Greinacher A. Donor exposures in recipients of pooled platelet concentrates. N Engl J Med. 2013 Jan 31;368(5):487-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1213383. — View Citation

Tobian AA, Fuller AK, Uglik K, Tisch DJ, Borge PD, Benjamin RJ, Ness PM, King KE. The impact of platelet additive solution apheresis platelets on allergic transfusion reactions and corrected count increment (CME). Transfusion. 2014 Jun;54(6):1523-9; quiz 1522. doi: 10.1111/trf.12498. Epub 2013 Nov 19. — View Citation

Tormey CA, Sweeney JD, Champion MH, Pisciotto PT, Snyder EL, Wu Y. Analysis of transfusion reactions associated with prestorage-pooled platelet components. Transfusion. 2009 Jun;49(6):1242-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2009.02128.x. Epub 2009 Mar 23. — View Citation

Verduin EP, Brand A, Schonewille H. Is female sex a risk factor for red blood cell alloimmunization after transfusion? A systematic review. Transfus Med Rev. 2012 Oct;26(4):342-53, 353.e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.tmrv.2011.12.001. Epub 2012 Jan 13. Review. — View Citation

Zou S, Stramer SL, Dodd RY. Donor testing and risk: current prevalence, incidence, and residual risk of transfusion-transmissible agents in US allogeneic donations. Transfus Med Rev. 2012 Apr;26(2):119-28. doi: 10.1016/j.tmrv.2011.07.007. Epub 2011 Aug 25. Review. — View Citation

* Note: There are 16 references in all — Click here to view all references

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Quantitation of adverse events		60 day endpoint
Secondary	Quantitation of RBC alloantibody formation	Quantitation of new DAT formation	15 and 30 minutes post-transfusion

External Links

•   National Healthcare Safety Network Biovigilance component Hemovigilance module Surveillance Protocol: Center for Disease Control Prevention, ed.2017