Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT00776919
Other study ID # 114677
Secondary ID W0261-301
Status Completed
Phase Phase 3
First received October 21, 2008
Last updated February 9, 2012
Start date October 2008
Est. completion date October 2009

Study information

Verified date February 2012
Source GlaxoSmithKline
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority Canada: Health CanadaUnited States: Food and Drug Administration
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

This is a Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Study to evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of a clindamycin / benzoyl peroxide gel in Subjects with Acne Vulgaris


Description:

A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, comparator and vehicle-controlled study in subjects with acne vulgaris. Approximately 1320 subjects will be enrolled. Subjects will be randomized to 1 of 4 parallel study groups in a 1:1:1:1 ratio (clindamycin / benzoyl peroxide gel:clindamycin gel:BPO gel:vehicle gel).


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 1315
Est. completion date October 2009
Est. primary completion date September 2009
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender Both
Age group 12 Years to 45 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- Be 12 to 45 years of age, inclusive, and in good general health.

- Clinical diagnosis of acne vulgaris

- Females of childbearing potential participating in the study must agree to use a medically acceptable method of contraception while receiving protocol-assigned product.

- Have the ability and willingness to follow all study procedures, attend all scheduled visits, and successfully complete the study.

- Have the ability to understand and sign a written informed consent form, which must be completed prior to study specific tasks being performed. Subjects under the legal age of consent in the state/province/country where the study is conducted must provide assent and have the written informed consent of a parent or guardian.

Exclusion Criteria:

- Are pregnant or breast-feeding.

- Have a history or presence of other conditions that may increase the risk of the subject participating in the study and/or affect the evaluated outcomes.

- Used topical antibiotics on the face or used systemic antibiotics within the past 2 weeks.

- Used topical corticosteroids on the face or systemic corticosteroids within the past 4 weeks. Use of inhaled, intra-articular, or intra-lesional steroids other than for facial acne is acceptable.

- Used systemic retinoids within the past 6 months or topical retinoids within the past 6 weeks.

- Received treatment with estrogens (including oral, implanted, injected and topical contraceptives), androgens, or anti-androgenic agents for 12 weeks or less immediately prior to starting study product. Subjects who have been treated with estrogens, as described above, androgens, or anti-androgenic agents for more than 12 consecutive weeks prior to start of study product are allowed to enroll as long as they do not expect to change dose, drug, or discontinue use during the study.

- Used topical anti-acne medications (eg, BPO, azelaic acid, resorcinol, salicylates, etc.) within the past 2 weeks.

- Used abradents or facial procedures, within the past 2 weeks.

- Use medications that may exacerbate acne.

- Have a known hypersensitivity or have had previous allergic reaction to any of the active components, lincomycin, or excipients of the study product.

- Used any investigational therapy within the past 4 weeks, or currently participating in another clinical study.

Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor), Primary Purpose: Treatment


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Drug:
clindamycin / benzoyl peroxide gel
Once a day application to the face
clindamycin gel
Once a day application to the face
BPO gel
Once a day application to the face
vehicle gel
Once a day application to the face

Locations

Country Name City State
Belize Dermatology and Skin Care Center FXM Research International Belize City
Belize Dr. Moguel's Clinic/FXM Research International Belize City
Canada Dermatrial Research Hamilton Ontario
Canada Lynderm Research, Inc. Markham Ontario
Canada North Bay Dermatology Centre North Bay Ontario
Canada CRDQ Centre de Recherche Dermatologique du Quebec Quebec
Canada Nexus Clinical Research St. John's
Canada Guildford Dermatology Specialist Surrey British Columbia
United States Atlanta Dermatology & Vein Research Center, LLC Alpharetta Georgia
United States Arlington Center for Dermatology Arlington Texas
United States Skin Care Research, Inc. Boca Raton Florida
United States Cherry Creek Research, Inc. Denver Colorado
United States Dawes Fretzin Clinical Research Group Indianapolis Indiana
United States The Skin Wellness Center, PC Knoxville Tennessee
United States SKINQRI Lincolnshire Illinois
United States DermResearch, PLLC Louisville Kentucky
United States FXM Research Miami Florida
United States University of Miami Cosmetic Medicine and Research Institute Miami Beach Florida
United States Dermatology Associates of Rochester, PC Rochester New York
United States Progressive Clinical Research San Antonio Texas
United States Rady Children's Hospital San Diego, Div. of Pediatric & Adolescents Dermatology San Diego California
United States The Laser Institute for Dermatology Santa Monica California
United States DermResearch Center of New York Stony Brook New York
United States Somerset Skin Centre Troy Michigan

Sponsors (4)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Stiefel, a GSK Company GlaxoSmithKline, Quintiles, Inc., Rho, Inc.

Countries where clinical trial is conducted

United States,  Belize,  Canada, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Number of Participants With Improvement of at Least 2 Grades in the Investigator's Static Global Assessment (ISGA) Score From Baseline to Week 12 During each study visit, investigators/assessors evaluated acne severity of the participants' faces using the ISGA scale: 0=clear skin with no lesions (L); 1=almost clear, rare non-inflammatory L; 2=mild, some non-inflammatory L with no more than a few inflammatory L, no nodular L; 3=moderate, many non-inflammatory L, may have some inflammatory L, but no more than 1 small nodular L; 4=severe, many non-inflammatory and inflammatory L, but no more than a few nodular L; 5=very severe, many non-inflammatory and inflammatory L, and more than a few nodular L. Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12 No
Primary Mean Change From Baseline (BL) to Week 12 in Inflammatory Lesion Counts During each study visit, trained study personnel at every investigational center assessed the inflammatory (pustules [small inflamed elevation of the skin that is filled with pus], papules [solid elevation of skin with no visible fluid], nodules [larger than papules with significant depth]) lesion counts for each participant. Each type of lesion was counted separately, and counts were taken from the face (including forehead, nose, cheeks, and chin). Missing values were imputed using the last observation carried forward (LOCF) method. Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12 No
Primary Mean Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Non-inflammatory Lesion Counts During each study visit, trained study personnel at every investigational center assessed the non-inflammatory (open comedones [blackheads] and closed comedones [whiteheads]) lesion counts for each participant. Each type of lesion was counted separately, and counts were taken from the face (including forehead, nose, cheeks, and chin). Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12 No
Primary Mean Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Total Lesion Counts During each study visit, trained study personnel at every investigational center assessed the inflammatory (pustules, papules, nodules) and non-inflammatory (open and closed comedones) lesion counts for each participant. Each type of lesion was counted separately; the lesion counts were taken from the face (including forehead, nose, cheeks, and chin). Total lesion counts were calculated as the sum of the inflammatory and non-inflammatory lesion counts. Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12 No
Secondary Mean Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Lesion Counts (Total, Inflammatory, and Non-inflammatory) During each study visit, trained study personnel at every investigational center assessed the inflammatory (pustules, papules, nodules) and non-inflammatory (open and closed comedones) lesion counts for each participant. Each type of lesion was counted separately; the lesion counts were taken from the face (including forehead, nose, cheeks, and chin). Total lesion counts were calculated as the sum of the inflammatory and non-inflammatory lesion counts. Percent change from Baseline to Week 12 was calculated as the value at Week 12 minus the value at Baseline divided by the Baseline value * 100. Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12 No
Secondary Number of Participants Who Had a Subject Global Assessment (SGA) Score of 0 or 1 at Week 12 During each study visit, participants evaluated their facial acne (excluding the scalp) using the SGA scale: 0=free of acne, with only an occasional blackhead/whitehead; 1=several blackheads/whiteheads and small pimples, no tender deep-seated bumps/cysts; 2=several to many blackheads/whiteheads and small to medium-sized pimples, one deep-seated bump/cyst; 3=many blackheads/whiteheads, many medium- to large-sized pimples, few deep-seated bumps/cysts; 4=presence of blackheads/whiteheads, several to many medium- to large-sized pimples, deep-seated bumps/cysts dominate. Week 12 No
Secondary Number of Participants Who Had an ISGA Score of 0 or 1 at Week 12 During each study visit, investigators/assessors evaluated the acne severity of participants' faces using the ISGA scal: 0=clear skin with no lesions (L); 1=almost clear, rare non-inflammatory L; 2=mild, some non-inflammatory L with no more than a few inflammatory L, no nodular L; 3=moderate, many non-inflammatory L, may have some inflammatory L, but no more than 1 small nodular L; 4=severe, many non-inflammatory and inflammatory L, but no more than a few nodular L; 5=very severe, many non-inflammatory and inflammatory L, and more than a few nodular L. Week 12 No
Secondary Mean Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure Systolic and diastolic blood pressure were measured at Baseline and Week 12 (end of study). Mean change from Baseline was calculated as the mean value at Week 12 minus the mean value at Baseline. Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12 No
Secondary Mean Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Temperature Temperature was measured at Baseline and Week 12 (end of study). Mean change from Baseline was calculated as the mean value at Week 12 minus the mean value at Baseline. Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12 No
Secondary Mean Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Pulse Rate Pulse rate was measured at Baseline and Week 12 (end of study). Mean change from Baseline was calculated as the mean value at Week 12 minus the mean value at Baseline. Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12 No
Secondary Mean Change From Baseline to Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12 in Erythema, Dryness, and Peeling Erythema (Er, redness), dryness (Dr), and peeling (Pn), were evaluated independently by the investigator as: 0 (absent)=no Er, Dr, or Pn; 1 (slight)=faint red/pink coloration (col.), barely perceptible Dr with no flakes or fissure, mild localized Pn; 2 (mild)=light red/pink col., perceptible Dr with no flakes/fissure, mild and diffuse Pn; 3 (moderate)=medium red col., easily noted Dr and flakes but no fissure; 4 (severe)=beet red col., Dr with flakes and fissure, prominent dense Pn. Change from Baseline was calculated as the value at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12 minus the the value at Baseline. Baseline; Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12 No
Secondary Mean Change From Baseline to Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12 in Itching and Burning/Stinging Itching and burning/stinging (piercing pain) were evaluated independently by the investigator as: 0 (none)=normal, no discomfort; 1 (slight)=noticeable discomfort that caused intermittent awareness; 2 (moderate)=noticeable discomfort that caused intermittent awareness and interfered occasionally with normal daily activities; 3 (strong)=definite continuous discomfort that interfered with normal daily activities. Change from Baseline was calculated as the value at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12 minus the value at Baseline. Baseline; Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12 No
Secondary Mean Duration of Study Product Use Mean duration of study product use was calculated as the average total duration inclusive of missed applications of the study product. Baseline (Day 1) through Week 12 No
Secondary Number of Participants Reporting the Indicated Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs) Resulting in Study Product Discontinuation An AE included, but was not limited to, any clinically significant worsening of a pre-existing condition; an event occurring from overdose (i.e., a dose higher than that indicated in the protocol) of the study product, whether accidental or intentional; an event occurring from abuse (e.g., use for nonstudy reasons) of the study product; or an event that was associated with the discontinuation of the use of the study product. Baseline (Day 1) through Week 12 No
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT04321070 - Bio-equivalence Study With Clinical Endpoints in the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris Phase 1
Recruiting NCT05755256 - The Impact of Probiotics on Skin Hydration in Youth With Mild Acne Phase 2
Completed NCT05131373 - Safety, Tolerability, and Immunogenicity of ORI-A-ce001 for the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris Phase 1
Completed NCT01445301 - Study STF115287, a Clinical Confirmation Study of GSK2585823 in the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris in Japanese Subjects Phase 3
Completed NCT03303170 - Non-Significant Risk Study of Sebacia Microparticles in the Treatment of Facial Acne Vulgaris N/A
Completed NCT04698239 - Clinical Evaluation of the Safety and Benefits of the Milesman 445 nm Blue Laser on Inflammatory Acne Lesions. N/A
Completed NCT02886715 - A Study Comparing Tazarotene Cream 0.1% to TAZORAC® (Tazarotene) Cream 0.1% and Both to a Placebo Control in the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris Phase 3
Terminated NCT02924428 - Venus Versa Diamondpolar Applicator Treatment Followed by AC Dual Applicator Treatment for Facial Acne Vulgaris N/A
Completed NCT02709902 - Study Comparing Adapalene/BP Gel to EPIDUO® FORTE and Both to a Placebo Control in Treatment of Acne Vulgaris Phase 1
Not yet recruiting NCT02535871 - A Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of IDP-121 and IDP-121 Vehicle Lotion in the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris Phase 3
Not yet recruiting NCT02491060 - A Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of IDP-121 and IDP-121 Vehicle Lotion in the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris Phase 3
Not yet recruiting NCT02525822 - Study to Compare the Safety and Efficacy of IDP-123 Lotion to Tazorac Cream in the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris Phase 2
Completed NCT02913001 - The Effect of a Low Glycemic Load Diet on Hormonal Markers Associated With Acne N/A
Completed NCT02250430 - A Phase 1 Study Assessing Local Cutaneous Effects of SB204 Phase 1
Completed NCT01769664 - A Study Comparing Clindamycin 1%/Benzoyl Peroxide 5% Topical Gel to Duac® Topical Gel in the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris Phase 1
Completed NCT01694810 - Cutaneous Tolerability and Safety of NVN1000 Topical Gel in Healthy Volunteers Phase 1
Completed NCT01727440 - Identifying the Genetic Predictors of Severe Acne Vulgaris and the Outcome of Oral Isotretinoin Treatment N/A
Completed NCT01194375 - A Dose-Ranging Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of IDP-107 in Patients With Acne Vulgaris Phase 2
Completed NCT01706250 - U0289-401: Eight Week, Split-face, Study to Determine and Compare the Efficacy and Tolerability of MAXCLARITY™ II to PROACTIV™ Phase 4
Completed NCT02524665 - 8 Week Study to Evaluate and Compare the Efficacy and Tolerability of MAXCLARITY II and MURAD To Treat Acne Phase 4