Clinical Trials Logo

Acne Vulgaris clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Acne Vulgaris.

Filter by:

NCT ID: NCT03395678 Withdrawn - Acne Vulgaris Clinical Trials

Acne Scarring in Skin of Color: Laser vs Microneedling

Start date: November 2019
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Atrophic acne scars are a common and important sequelae of acne that affect up to 43-55% of patients with acne. Scarring impacts quality of life with reports of diminished self-esteem and frustration/sadness; additionally, some individuals report that their appearance even interferes with their professional lives. Though many treatments for acne scarring exist including ablative and nonablative lasers, subcision, and peels, none is without risk of adverse effects of pain, post-procedure redness or pigmentary changes. There have been no randomized studies directly comparing the effectiveness and safety profiles of microneedling (Dermapen) to 1,540nm nonablative fractional lasers (Palomar StarLux) in the treatment of atrophic acne scarring in skin of color. This clinical trial aims to determine which treatment modality -- microneedling or nonablative fractional laser -- is safer and more efficacious in the treatment of acne scarring in patients with skin of color.

NCT ID: NCT03393494 Completed - Acne Vulgaris Clinical Trials

Bioequivalence Study of Two Treatments in the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris on the Face

Start date: December 13, 2017
Phase: Phase 3
Study type: Interventional

To compare the safety and efficacy of Perrigo's product to an FDA approved product for the treatment of Acne Vulgaris

NCT ID: NCT03380845 Completed - Acne Scars Clinical Trials

Comparison of 1,550-nm Laser and Fractional Radiofrequency Microneedle for the Treatment of Acne Scars in Ethnic Skin

Start date: March 16, 2018
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The primary objective of this randomized, split-face, controlled study is to compare the efficacy and safety of a erbium-doped 1,550-nm non-ablative fractional laser and a bipolar fractional radiofrequency microneedle device for the treatment of atrophic facial acne scars in ethnic skin (Fitzpatrick Skin Phototypes III-VI). The hypothesis of this study is that both erbium-doped 1,550-nm non-ablative fractional laser and the bipolar fractional radiofrequency microneedle device are equally effective for the treatment of atrophic acne scars in ethnic skin (SPT III-VI). However, the bipolar fractional radiofrequency microneedle device has less adverse effects than erbium-doped 1,550-nm non-ablative fractional laser due to the absence of scattering and the absence of chromophore-specific targets - predominantly melanin - traditionally needed with laser treatments; hence the fractional radiofrequency microneedle device will have a higher safety profile in darker skin types .

NCT ID: NCT03361345 Withdrawn - Clinical trials for Postinflammatory Hyperpigmentation

Topical 5% Tranexamic Acid as a Treatment for Postinflammatory Hyperpigmentation Due to Acne Vulgaris

Start date: November 1, 2018
Phase: Phase 2/Phase 3
Study type: Interventional

The goal of this study is to determine if topical tranexamic acid is capable of decreasing the pigment of the dark spots left from acne bumps. The first line medication used for this often is not tolerated well by patients, and topical tranexamic acid has minimal reported side effects thus far.

NCT ID: NCT03341910 Completed - Acne Vulgaris Clinical Trials

A Study to Assess the Safety and Local Tolerability of DFD-03 (Tazarotene) Lotion, 0.1% Compared to Tazorac® Cream, 0.1% in the Topical Treatment of Acne Vulgaris

Start date: August 21, 2017
Phase: Phase 2
Study type: Interventional

A study for Subjects with mild to moderate facial acne vulgaris. During the 12-week treatment period subjects randomized to DFD-03 Lotion or Vehicle Lotion will use the study drug twice daily. Subjects randomized to Tazorac Cream or Vehicle Cream will use the study drug once daily in the evening. Safety assessments will include the investigator's assessment of local cutaneous tolerance/application site reactions on the face, vital signs and adverse events.

NCT ID: NCT03334682 Completed - Acne Vulgaris Clinical Trials

Randomized Double-blind Study on the Benefit of Spironolactone for Treating Acne of Adult Woman.

FASCE
Start date: January 31, 2018
Phase: Phase 3
Study type: Interventional

Acne vulgaris of adult woman has increased over the past 10 years; it affects currently 20% to 30% of adult women. The physiopathology of adult woman acne is distinguished from the teenager one by essentially 2 factors: - hormonal factor with a peripheral hyperandrogenism coupled with an hypersensibility of cutaneous androgens receptors of these women. But this point is still at the stage of hypothesis. - inflammatory factor linked with Propionibacterium Aces ; indeed these women received most of the time many cures of local and systematic antibiotics at the origin of resistant Propionibacterium Aces strains which lead to a chronical activation of cutaneous innate immunity. On a therapeutic plan, four types of systemic treatment, approved in this indication are: - Tetracyclines which are problematic for the bacterial resistance and consequently constant relapse when they are stopped. - Zinc salts which target only the inflammatory lesions and were shown less effective than cycline - Antiandrogens, with acetate of cyproterone associated with risks of phlebitis and pulmonary embolism, and increase risk of triglycerides, cholesterol and hepatic balance. - The last alternative is represented by isotretinoin but the use in women of childbearing potential is binding because of the teratogen risks and the hyperandrogenism represents an identified risk of relapse. In this context, the spironolactone could represent an interesting alternative. It blocks the 5-alpha-reductase receptors at sebaceous gland and inhibits Luteinizing hormone (LH) production at the pituitary level. It is not submitted to isotretinoin constraints, does not lead to bacterial resistance and targets the peripheral hyperandrogenism. Currently, very few studies have been performed and on a weak number of patients but they showed that at low doses (lower than 200mg/day), spironolactone can be effective against acne. In that context, it seemed clearly interesting to perform the first double-blind randomized study spironolactone vs cyclines which remains the moderate acne reference treatment and to demonstrate the superiority of spironolactone's efficacy in order to establish it as alternative way to cycline.

NCT ID: NCT03333759 Withdrawn - Acne Vulgaris Clinical Trials

Treatment of Acne Scars With Erbium:Yttrium Aluminum Garnet (Er:YAG) Laser Examined Under OCT

Start date: August 2018
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

This study is examining the effects of the 2940 nm Er:YAG on atrophic facial acne scars under optical coherence tomography in terms of blood flow, vessel shape, skin roughness, collagen content, and epidermal thickness.

NCT ID: NCT03307577 Completed - Acne Vulgaris Clinical Trials

A Phase 2 Safety and Efficacy Study of UHE-101 Cream in Subjects With Acne Vulgaris

Start date: October 5, 2017
Phase: Phase 2
Study type: Interventional

UHE-101 cream, 1% ("UHE-101") is being developed for the topical treatment of acne vulgaris. The purpose of this study is to compare the safety and efficacy of twice daily topical application of UHE-101 cream for 12 weeks to its vehicle cream in subjects with facial acne vulgaris.

NCT ID: NCT03303170 Completed - Acne Vulgaris Clinical Trials

Non-Significant Risk Study of Sebacia Microparticles in the Treatment of Facial Acne Vulgaris

Start date: September 25, 2017
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Prospective, randomized, controlled, parallel group clinical study with blinded assessment evaluating Sebacia Microparticles (SM) with Nd:Yag laser in facial inflammatory acne vulgaris

NCT ID: NCT03292640 Completed - Acne Vulgaris Clinical Trials

A Study of the Safety and Efficacy of DFD-03 Lotion in the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris for 12 Weeks

Start date: July 6, 2017
Phase: Phase 3
Study type: Interventional

Enrollment of subjects with mild to moderate facial acne vulgaris. Co-Primary efficacy endpoints included: - Absolute change from Baseline to Week 12 in the inflammatory lesion counts on the face - Absolute change from Baseline to Week 12 in the non-inflammatory lesion counts on the face - Proportion of subjects with a clinical response of "success" at Week 12 for lesions on the face. Success based on IGA is defined as an IGA score of 0 (Clear) or 1 (Almost clear) at Week 12 with at least a 2-grade reduction from Baseline.