View clinical trials related to Vision, Low.
Filter by:Primary objective of our study is to develop and validate an internet-based digital near and intermediate-vision reading test in the greek language.
This project will apply non-invasive, trans-cutaneous vagal nerve stimulation using various stimulation parameters to young, healthy adults to find the optimal set of parameters to elicit pupil response.
This study is a prospective, non-interventional, multicenter, open-label study in nAMD and DME patients being treated with brolucizumab according to the EU SmPC. An observational study design, without a strict, mandated visit schedule or mandated treatment regimen was chosen as the most appropriate to collect available data in a real life setting. For that reason, this NIS does not impose a therapy protocol, diagnostic/therapeutic procedure or a visit schedule. The diagnostic or monitoring procedures are only those ordinarily applied to the therapeutic strategy and to routine clinical care and will take place as per investigator's discretion. This includes e.g. visit frequency, injection frequency and types of assessments performed - only data from routine medical practice will be collected as part of the study.
The study will evaluate the safety of ophthalmic bevacizumab in subjects diagnosed with a retinal condition that would benefit from treatment with intravitreal injection of bevacizumab, including: exudative age-related macular degeneration, diabetic macular edema, or branch retinal vein occlusion.
The purpose of this study is an evaluation of a tactile labeling strategy developed in the Ophthalmology Clinical Research Center at University of Texas Medical Branch (UTMB) in collaboration with the UTMB Maker Space to improve low vision patients capability to identify their topical ophthalmic drop treatments and the frequency with which they should be administered. The labeling strategy includes protrusions as frequency markers and shapes to differentiate between treatments of similar frequency prescription.
This trial aims to assess the accuracy and test-retest variability of a new digital app which enables community visual acuity testing without requirement of an trained examiner.
Visual developmental abnormalities affect 10 to 15% of the population under 6 years of age and leads to amblyopia in 30% of cases if left untreated. Untreated amblyopia in adulthood has consequences on the quality of life of individuals but will also represent a cost to society due to the increased risk of visual impairment. The screening protocol for this study recommends that a screening examination for amblyopia and amblyogenic factors be routinely performed by an orthoptist in children between 3 and 4 year old. This examination should include, as a minimum, a standardised measurement of visual acuity, a cover test and a measurement of refraction by photoscreener. In the event of a positive screening, the child must then be referred to an ophthalmologist so as to complete an ophthalmological examination. The aim of this protocol is to propose screening tests usually performed with a high specificity, in order to avoid congestion of ophthalmological services (i.e. by avoiding excessive or unnecessary referral of children to the ophthalmologist) without losing sensitivity by combining several tests. The orthoptists' role in this screening protocol is to facilitate an extensive screening coverage of the population in this age group, as they are more easily accessed by the patients and more equitably spread in the community than ophthalmologists. Therefore, by initially screening and then referring less children to the ophthalmologist, the aim is to reduce waiting times in the access of ophthalmological services which could be detrimental in terms of treatment success rates for patients acutely needing care. Based on the referral of children between 3 and 4 years of age by the orthoptist to an ophthalmologist, the analysis of the data from the standard screening protocol used in our centre will enable us to validate it scientifically. The referral thresholds can thus be secondarily adjusted for each test if the initial objectives are not achieved (specificity > 90% and sensitivity > 87%). The aim of this study is also to observe a change in the patient flow by reducing the volume of consultations with the ophthalmologist currently required based on the present referral rate. The efficiency of the screening protocol by calculating the probable economic gain linked to the modification of the screening circuit will be secondarily studying in this protocol
Prompted by the current COVID-19 pandemic, the American Academy of Ophthalmology has recommended the use of telemedicine to continue ophthalmic care while maintaining patient and provider social distancing. As part of remote examinations, patients may be expected to perform home eye testing for visual acuity and the use of various home visual acuity charts have been proposed to provide clinicians with this vital data. However, the use of home visual acuity exams has not been validated in our patient population. This project aims to determine the efficacy and validity of measuring visual acuity at home with a printed-out ETDRS chart.
This study is driven by the hypothesis that navigation for users of retinal prosthetics can be greatly improved by incorporating Spatial Localization and Mapping (SLAM) and object recognition technology conveying environmental information via a retinal prosthesis and auditory feedback. The investigators will study how effectively the SLAM technology enables the visual prosthesis system to construct a map of the user's environment and locate the user within that map. The technology will be tested both with normally sighted individuals donning a virtual reality headset and with retinal prosthesis users (Argus II).
This study aims to validate an observer-rated assessment titled "Functional Low-Vision Observer Rated Assessment (FLORA-20)", which comprises 20 functional vision tasks commonly performed in or around a blind individual's home environment. This study shall be carried out with individuals who have an implanted visual prosthesis device. There are no new implantations or changes to the original implant or external wearables being studied or tested. Additionally, data from the study shall not be used alter standard of care or the user's treatment options.