Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Summary

The purpose of this study is to investigate what happens to biologic mesh in the body over time on a molecular level. To date, it is not known what agents, enzymes, or proteins are interacting at the implantation site that contributes to mesh remodeling and/or degradation. Investigators on this project will identify patients with previously placed mesh who are needing reoperation on the same site and take a biopsy of the mesh during the normal course of surgery. Basic data surrounding the surgical procedure will be collected. The mesh samples will be analyzed for enzymes and proteins and examined histologically for processes that signify remodeling and/or degradation. Control patients will undergo biopsy of abdominal fascia at laparoscopic trocar sites in a manner that will not affect the outcome(s) of their procedure or other risk to the incision site.


Clinical Trial Description

Several such biologic meshes have now been developed and marketed for use in hernia repair and soft tissue reconstruction. These biologics include one product derived from porcine intestinal submucosa (SurgisisTM, Cook Medical), another derived from porcine dermis (CollaMendTM, C.R. Bard Inc.) and several others derived from decellularized human dermis, such as AlloDermTM (LifeCell Corp.), AlloMaxTM (C.R. Bard Inc.), and FlexHDTM (Musculoskeletal Transplant Foundation). Although similar in concept and design, each of these biologic meshes is produced in a distinct, proprietary fashion, and different techniques are used by each company in the processing and storage of their respective products. Given that these processing steps are protected industrial intellectual property, rigorous comparison of the performance of each mesh is very difficult. It is expected that certain methods, such as employing or avoiding chemical cross-linking of the ECM proteins, would lead to significant differences in cell migration into, and biochemical remodeling of each individual mesh. These differences may be of particular importance in the scenario of laparoscopic ventral hernia repair, where the mesh is placed in direct apposition to the parietal peritoneum. In this case, if the biologic were to remodel and take on more of the properties of the distensible peritoneum rather than that of the stronger abdominal wall fascia, this could have a significant impact on the long-term strength and durability of the hernia repair. A similar situation could also be foreseen to occur at the esophageal hiatus and/or the site of an intestinal stoma. We feel that it is thus important to study the remodeling processes that these meshes undergo over time and determine if differences in product processing or anatomical position have any effect on mesh incorporation and hernia integrity. Many of these meshes have already been used in human subjects, yet a certain number of these patients are known have suffered hernia recurrences requiring reoperation and removal of some or all of the original mesh prostheses. It is our belief that these biologic explants represent an excellent source of material to study the remodeling process over numerous given time points and at various anatomic locations. We feel it is also important to compare the explanted biologic meshes to "control" tissues, to examine how successfully the biologic meshes are mimicking native tissue at the molecular and histologic level. To eliminate confounding factors, explanted meshes will be compared to biopsies of abdominal wall fascia from patients undergoing non-hernia related surgical procedures. ;


Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


NCT number NCT01060046
Study type Observational
Source Washington University School of Medicine
Contact
Status Completed
Phase
Start date August 2007
Completion date January 2017

See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Recruiting NCT06016426 - Mass Closure vs Layer by Layer Closure N/A
Recruiting NCT05572021 - A Comparison of the Outcomes in Fortiva and Strattice Mesh N/A
Completed NCT02263625 - Regional Differences In Indication for Ventral Hernia Repair
Completed NCT02292264 - Risk Factors and Complications of Ventral Hernia Repair
Completed NCT02263599 - Conservative Treatment For Ventral Hernia
Completed NCT01961687 - A Prospective, Multi-Center Study of Phasix™ Mesh for Ventral or Incisional Hernia Repair. N/A
Completed NCT01325246 - Reoperation Rate Versus Clinical Recurrence After Ventral Hernia Repair N/A
Completed NCT03283982 - Laparoscopic vs. Robotic Ventral Hernia Repair With IPOM N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT05526209 - Longitudinal Relaxing Incision as a Technique for Recurrence Prevention in Ventral Hernia
Completed NCT04438369 - Evaluation of Ultrasound-guided Erector Spinae Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Laprascopic Ventral Hernia Repair. N/A
Recruiting NCT04173884 - Video-based Collaborative Learning to Improve Ventral Hernia Repair N/A
Recruiting NCT02703662 - Performance of Biologic Mesh Materials in Abdominal Wall Reconstruction Phase 2/Phase 3
Completed NCT03938688 - Randomized Control Trial Comparing Transfascial Suture for Mesh Fixation to No Mesh Fixation N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT01719718 - The Influence of Closing the Gap on Postoperative Seroma and Recurrences in Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair N/A
Completed NCT03342040 - Transverse Abdominis Plane Block in Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair N/A
Completed NCT04150796 - Comparing eTEP and Laparoscopic Intraperitoneal Onlay Mesh (IPOM) for Ventral Hernias N/A
Recruiting NCT03222102 - Ventral Hernia Prevention After Liver Transplantation N/A
Completed NCT05610267 - Gentrix® Surgical Matrix for Soft Tissue Reinforcement in Ventral Hernia Repair
Terminated NCT01794338 - The Use of Biologic Mesh vs Bioabsorbable Mesh During Ventral Hernia Repair in At-risk Patients N/A
Completed NCT01886963 - A Clinical Trial Using Spy Elite System in Planning Tissue Advancement Flaps After Ventral Hernia Repair N/A