Venous Leg Ulcer Clinical Trial
Official title:
Pilot, Randomised, Double-blind, Controlled Clinical Trial on the Combined Efficacy of Prontosan Wound Irrigation Solution and Prontosan Wound Gel in the Reduction in Size and Change in Bioburden of Hard-to-heal Venous Leg Ulcers
The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of Prontosan® Wound Irrigation Solution and Prontosan® Wound Gel in the treatment of hard-to heal venous leg ulcers compared to control saline irrigation solution and inactive gel by showing a reduction in size over a 12 week period.
SUMMARY
Sponsor: B. BRAUN Medical AG
Trade name: Prontosan® Wound Irrigation Solution Prontosan® Wound Gel
Active substance: Polihexanide (0.1%) Betaine (0.1%)
Study Duration (per patient):
13 weeks, including the 1 week run in period
Primary Objective:
To evaluate the efficacy of the combination of Prontosan® Wound Irrigation Solution and
Prontosan® Wound Gel in the reduction of wound size of hard-to-heal venous leg ulcers
compared to control saline irrigation solution and inactive gel.
Secondary Objectives:
To assess the change in bio-burden (assessment of organisms present) and to determine local
tolerance as well as reduction in pain and to monitor exudate control.
Methodology:
A pilot randomised, double-blind, controlled clinical trial at a single centre
Planned number of patients:
A sample size of N= 15 evaluable patients was estimated for each treatment group (group "A"
and "B"). Adding a dropout rate of approx. 25% results in a total number of patients for
both treatment groups of N=38.
Study Visits:
Visit 0 (-1 week) - Screening Visit 1 ( Week 0) - Treatment and assessment visit Visit 2
(Week 1, day 7 +/- 1 day) - Treatment and assessment visit Visit 3 (Week 2, day14 +/- 1 day)
- Treatment and assessment visit Visit 4 (Week 4, day 28 +/- 2 days) - Treatment and
assessment visit Visit 5 (Week 8, day 56 +/- 2 days) - Treatment and assessment visit Visit
6 (Week 12, day 84 +/- 2 days) - End of study following 12 weeks of treatment or at healing
whichever is soonest
The number of additional visits will be recorded in the Case Report Forms.
Treatment efficacy assessment:
Clinical signs and symptoms will be compared between the two randomised groups with
microbiological analysis and, computer planimetry assessments of ulcer size, using Visitrak™
(Smith & Nephew), and digital photography at entry to the study, at each planned study visit
and at healing or 12 weeks, whichever is soonest.
Tolerance assessment:
The tolerability of study treatment will be evaluation based on the intensity and the course
of adverse events (undesired concomitant effects, both subjectively perceived symptoms and
objectively detected signs of disease). Tolerance assessments will take place from visit 2
onwards
Assessment methods:
1. Assessment of clinical signs and symptoms, in particular related to development of
infection:
- reduction of slough and necrotic tissue
- control of exudate
- presence of granulation tissue
- reduction of inflammatory signs (surrounding skin)
- pain
2. Ulcer computerised planimetry using Visitrak™
3. Microbiological analysis for bioburden (the bioburden within an ulcer relates to a
microbiological qualitative and quantitative assessment of organisms present) assessed
by wound swab or biopsy
4. Serial photography with blinded assessment of progress using linear analogue scale
;
Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator), Primary Purpose: Treatment
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT03903692 -
A Comparative Evaluation of a MPS Dressing and a CMC Dressing on Subjects With Lower Extremity Venous Ulcers
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03257254 -
Effect of VarIthena on Wound Healing in Venous Leg Ulcers (VLU)
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT03666754 -
Early Glue Saphenous Vein Ablation With Compression Versus Compression Alone in the Healing of the Venous Ulcer
|
N/A | |
Withdrawn |
NCT02912858 -
Intermittent Pneumatic Compression of the Foot vs Geko Plus R-2 Neuromuscular Electrostimulation Device in Venous Leg Ulcer Patients
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02482038 -
Geko Venous Leg Ulcer Study
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02652572 -
Safety Study to Examine the Systemic Exposure of Granexin® Gel After Topical Application to Venous Leg Ulcers
|
Phase 1 | |
Unknown status |
NCT01658618 -
Safety Study Providing 12 Months Follow-up From First Exposure to HP802-247 in Subjects With Venous Leg Ulcer
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05646121 -
Suprasorb® A + Ag in the Treatment of Wounds at Risk of Infection and Infected Wounds
|
||
Completed |
NCT03077165 -
Dose-response Relationship Study of S42909 on Leg Ulcer Healing
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT04461132 -
The Effect of Manual Lymphatic Drainage
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05974982 -
Treatment Outcome of Autologous PRP Versus Conventional Therapy Among Patients With Chronic Venous Leg Ulcers
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT04011371 -
Cyanoacrylate Closure for Treatment of Venous Leg Ulcers
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT03543007 -
Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of GrafixPL™PRIME for the Treatment of Chronic Venous Leg Ulcers
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03286140 -
Early Venous Reflux Ablation Ulcer Trial
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05588583 -
A Clinical Investigation to Follow the Progress of Exuding Chronic Wounds Using Mepilex® Up as the Primary Dressing.
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT04613687 -
Efficacy and Safety of a New Compression System URGO BD001 in the Treatment of VLU (FREEDOM)
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05549609 -
A Study of XSTEM-VLU in Patients With Difficult-to-heal Venous Leg Ulcers
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05409976 -
The GORE® VIAFORT Vascular Stent IVC Study
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05089890 -
Clinical Investigation of Sorbact® Dressings
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT03670329 -
Management of Infection Risk in Non-comparative Trial (MINT)
|
N/A |