Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT03494582
Other study ID # AVVCP
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date April 1, 2017
Est. completion date December 1, 2018

Study information

Verified date November 2018
Source Ain Shams Maternity Hospital
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

This study will compare the vaginal versus the abdominal approach for the management of uterine prolapse


Description:

this study compares The unilateral sacrospinous hysteropexy with prolene sutures versus the abdominal sacral hysteropexy using Mersilene suture for the management of uterine prolapse


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 53
Est. completion date December 1, 2018
Est. primary completion date October 1, 2018
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender Female
Age group 20 Years to 40 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- Uterine Prolapse

Exclusion Criteria:

- Previous prolapse surgery Hereditary Connective tissue disorders

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Procedure:
Sacral Hysteropexy
Abdominal approach for uterine suspension
sacrospinous Hysteropexy
Transvaginal approach for uterine suspension

Locations

Country Name City State
Egypt Urogynecology Unit Cairo

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Ain Shams Maternity Hospital

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Egypt, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Pelvic organ prolapse quantification system compare Pelvic organ prolapse quantification system between groups 3 month
Secondary Perioperative data operative time 1 day
Secondary operative details blood loss 1 day
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT00158626 - Does Doing Pelvic Floor Exercise Ease Symptoms for Women Living With Prolapse? Phase 1/Phase 2
Recruiting NCT04009694 - Does a High BMI Affect Supervised Pelvic Floor Muscle Training for Improving Symptoms in Women With Various Stages of Pelvic Organ Prolapse? N/A
Recruiting NCT03095716 - Laparoscopic Surgery in Elderly Patients N/A
Completed NCT02888093 - A Randomized Controlled Trial of Permanent vs Absorbable Suture for Uterosacral Ligament Suspension N/A
Recruiting NCT04209036 - Can 3D Laparoscopy Improve Surgical Performances in Surgeons in Training?
Active, not recruiting NCT01097200 - Sacrocolpopexy Versus Vaginal Mesh Procedure for Pelvic Prolapse N/A
Recruiting NCT00162604 - Prophylactic Antibiotic Treatment During Vaginal Repair N/A
Recruiting NCT02547155 - Does Spinal Anesthesia for Prolapse Surgery With Lead to Urinary Retention? N/A
Recruiting NCT01396109 - GYNECARE PROSIMA* Procedure Versus Modified Total Pelvic Floor Reconstructive Surgery for Uterine Prolapse Stage III N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT03056586 - The Effect of Pessary Post Vaginal Prolapse Repair, for One Month, to Reduce the Recurrence Rate of Prolapse N/A
Recruiting NCT06024109 - Performance of SYMMCORA® vs. V-Loc® Suture Material in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Total Hysterectomy
Completed NCT02680145 - Prediction of Postsurgical Symptomatic Outcomes With Preoperative Pessary Use N/A
Completed NCT00557882 - Efficacy Study of Vaginal Mesh for Anterior Prolapse Phase 4
Recruiting NCT05586984 - Transvaginal Sacrospinous Hysteropexy Versus Laparoscopic Uterine Lateral Suspension
Recruiting NCT02935803 - A Study on the Anti-incontinent Effectiveness of the mTVM Method in POPQ Stage II-III Patients N/A
Completed NCT01628432 - Effect of Salpingectomy During Conservative Hysterectomy N/A
Recruiting NCT04637022 - 4K Versus 3D Laparoscopic Colporraphy by Surgeons in Training: a Prospective Randomized Trial
Terminated NCT01594372 - Comparison of Laparoscopic to Vaginal Surgical Repair for Uterine Prolapse N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT02231099 - Effectiveness Prolift+M Versus Conventional Vaginal Prolapse Surgery N/A
Completed NCT00475540 - Efficacy Study of Vaginal Mesh for Prolapse N/A