View clinical trials related to Spinal Surgery.
Filter by:The objective of this qualitative prospective observational study is to analyze the cognitive aspect, the emotional-behavioral state and the quality of life of patients during their stay on the waiting list for two categories of lumbar spinal surgery: arthrodesis and percutaneous vertebroplasty. Hypothesis: Considering the existing evidence that associates some peculiar psychological components (expectations, beliefs, fears, coping strategies) of the patient and the outcome of spinal surgery, as well as the importance that the waiting time for the intervention assumes for recovery post-operative, this study aims to investigate the subjective perception of one's condition and the waiting period prior to the expected spinal surgery. This is a qualitative prospective observational study, monocentric with variable sample up to the level of saturation. The blind members are the staff who will listen to the recordings of the interviews and prepare the summary table of the same and the statistical researcher who will perform the analyzes. The selection of the participants will be carried out in such a way as to ensure a heterogeneous sample in terms of age, sex and experience and as representative as possible of the population studied. The number of participants in qualitative studies is usually determined by intentional sampling, based on the need to understand the full range of possible responses, to obtain the so-called data saturation. All patients on the waiting lists of the Department of Spinal Surgery, for vertebral arthrodesis or percutaneous vertebroplasty are considered eligible. The two types of surgery differ both in the surgical procedure and in the duration of the wait before surgery, which is 1-2 months for vertebroplasty and more than one year for spinal arthrodeses which are not of urgency or priority.
The bronchodilator effects of volatile anesthetics have been the subject of many clinical studies. It is known that all volatile anesthetics, especially halothane, have similar effects. Sevoflurane has been shown to reduce airway resistance more than halothane and isoflurane. Desflurane is difficult to use as an induction agent due to its harsh and extremely pungent odor and airway irritating effect. However, it has been shown that the risk of cough, respiratory arrest and laryngospasm is no different from sevoflurane when administered after intravenous induction. Although it irritates the airway, it is thought to have a bronchodilation effect as it stimulates the sympathetic system. In spinal surgeries, prone position is required to access the operating field. When the patient is placed in the prone position, pulmonary physiology are affected. In the prone position, V/Q mismatch decreases and arterial oxygenation increases. However, lung compliance decreases and the peak inspiratory pressure required to reach the required tidal volume increases. The main purpose of this study is the effect of volatile agents on lung mechanics and oxygenisation in the prone position.
Osteosynthesis by pedicle screwing is the reference technique since the 1980s, due to the quality of the mechanical grip of the screw in the pedicle, despite difficulties of placing the implant in this narrow tunnel. This precision was improved by fluoroscopy, then by navigation, which made it possible to reduce the extra-pedicular placement of the screws and consequently the complications. Since the 2000s, robotic has been developed in all areas, including medicine and surgery, (Da Vinci robot in urology) and several robots are currently marketed for spinal surgery, Medtronic's Mazor X Stealth ™ robot being the most successful. The aim of this study is to evaluate on a prospective randomized comparative study the quality of the placement of the screws as well as the occurrence of complications, the clinical results and the medico-economic interest that robotic surgery can bring.
The researchers are doing this study to find out whether giving methadone during spinal surgery helps manage pain in the first 72 hours after surgery better than other standard pain medications. Participants' pain will be measured by how much pain is reported after surgery, and how much additional pain medication is needed to lower pain levels. The researchers will look at whether giving methadone during surgery reduces the need for other pain medications after surgery. In addition, the team will compare the effects of the two standard treatments- one with methadone and one without methadone to to evaluate which one works best.
Major spinal surgery causes greater pain in the postoperative 24 hours. Patients with severe pain may have prolonged hospital stays and delay in mobilization. In addition, chronic pain may be seen in these patients due to ineffectively managed acute postoperative pain. Therefore, optimizing acute postoperative analgesia is a priority in patients undergoing major spinal surgery. Recently, ultrasound-guided interfascial plane blocks such as thoracolumbar interfascial plane block (TLIPB)and the erector spinae plane block (ESPB) have been described in spinal surgery. Both blocks clinically seem to be safe and easily performed. The aims of this study are to compare the quality of recovery scores, overall morbidity and postoperative analgesia after major spinal surgery in patients receiving either TLIPB or ESPB.
Spinal surgery often involves multiple segments. The trauma of surgery is large, the duration of postoperative pain is long, and the pain is severe. Therefore, the use of opioids in perioperative period is large. Although the application of * large amounts of opioids can effectively inhibit pain, it will delay the recovery of urine retention, sedation, respiratory depression and gastrointestinal function. The delayed recovery of gastrointestinal function will increase the postoperative complications, and then increase the length of hospital stay and the cost of patients. Therefore, reducing the dosage of opioids to promote the recovery of gastrointestinal function has become the research direction. Intravenous lidocaine has been proved to be effective in reducing the dosage of opioids during the perioperative period of gastrointestinal surgery and promoting the recovery of postoperative gastrointestinal function. However, there are few studies on the application of lidocaine during the perioperative period of spinal surgery, especially the impact on postoperative gastrointestinal function. In this study, a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, controlled study was conducted to explore the effect of perioperative lidocaine on the recovery of gastrointestinal function after adult lumbar surgery. We hypothesized that lidocaine could shorten the recovery time of gastrointestinal function after lumbar surgery
Spinal Surgery can be associated with significant post operative pain. This can be a considerable source of morbidity, resulting in a longer duration of in- hospital stay and increasing opiate requirements. As a result the patient experiences a more arduous recovery process. Recently a new form of Regional Anaesthesia has been described for patients undergoing Spinal surgery. The Erector Spinae Plane Block involves depositing Local Anaesthetic under Ultra Sound guidance on top of the Transverse Process of the Spine and deep to the Erector Spinae Muscle. Patients who have had this procedure report lower pain scores and have a lesser opiate requirement in the post operative period.
The aim of this study is to collect systematically and proactively data regarding the performance of Neuro-Patch, like complications and handling, under daily clinical practice when used as intended by the manufacturer
This randomized controlled study was designed to evaluate the accuracy, safety and clinical outcomes of the robot assisted spinal surgery.
Study to Assess the Safety and Performance of the OrtoWell® Distractor in Patients Undergoing Spinal Surgery