View clinical trials related to Solid Tumor.
Filter by:The purpose of this study is to characterize the mass balance, absorption, metabolism, and elimination pathways of orally administered [14C] rucaparib followed by cycle by cycle treatment with rucaparib continuing until disease progression or other reason for discontinuation
This is an open-label, single ascending dose study to evaluate safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of Tripegfilgrastim in pediatric solid tumor/lymphoma patients
This study is aimed to determine the maximum tolerated dose of ensartinib, an oral ALK inhibitor in Chinese patients with ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer
The primary objectives of this study are: (Phase 1b) to investigate the safety and tolerability and to determine the recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) for magrolimab in combination with cetuximab; and (Phase 2) to evaluate overall response rate (ORR) of magrolimab in combination with cetuximab in participants with Kirsten rat sarcoma 2 viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) mutant and KRAS wild-type colorectal cancer (CRC).
A study of DHP107, a novel oral paclitaxel formulation, to determine maximum tolerated dose and recommended dose for phase II trial in patients with advanced solid cancer and explore efficacy of DHP107 in patients with gastric cancer
This trial is a multi-center, open-label, phase I, dose escalation study of PEP02 (liposomal encapsulated irinotecan) in combination with 5-FU and LV in patients with advanced solid tumors.
Immunosuppression induced by cancer treatment increases the risk of hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) reactivations. These viral reactivations may be asymptomatic but can cause fulminant hepatitis and death. More, they impact the treatment of cancer by chemotherapy delays or stops. They can occur during cancer treatment but also after stopping, at the immunological rebound. This risk persists for at least 6 months after cessation. The key to the prevention, and the first step, is serological testing. It is also the main problem because international recommendations diverge. Hepatologists and infectious disease specialists recommend routine screening HBV of all candidates for immunosuppressive therapy. These recommendations are more implemented by hematologists, given the frequency of HBV reactivation associated to haematological malignancies. Clinical oncology societies guidelines suggest a selective screening in case of risk factors of hepatitis B or in patients with a strong immunosuppression (such as anti-CD20 based treatment, stem cell transplantation or lymphoma treatment). The consequence of these differences is a sub-screening by oncologists and the persistence of fatal cases. Screening before cytotoxic chemotherapy for solid tumors in countries with low prevalence of HBV and HCV virus is questionable. Selective screening of patients at risk HBV and HCV can be assessed.
The study purpose is to learn about the safety and tolerability of IMA101 alone (Cohort 1) or in combination with atezolizumab (Cohort 2) in patients with advanced solid cancers that express pre-defined Immatics tumor targets.
The purpose of this study is to characterize the safety, tolerability, and determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) or the highest protocol-defined dose, in the absence of exceeding the MTD, of KHK2455 administered orally in combination with mogamulizumab to subjects with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors.
The main purpose of this study is to determine the dose of poly-ICLC that is safe and tolerable when it is combined with pembrolizumab in patients with colon cancer. This study will also evaluate how the combination of pembrolizumab and poly-ICLC activates the immune system in the patient's blood and inside the tumor; how it affects the size and number of tumor(s) in each patient; and how effective the combination is in patients with colon cancer that is unlikely to respond to pembrolizumab alone.