Clinical Trials Logo

Satisfaction clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Satisfaction.

Filter by:

NCT ID: NCT02273011 Completed - Pain Clinical Trials

Combined Spinal-epidural Versus Spinal Analgesia for Elective Caesarean Section in the Postoperative Period

Start date: March 2007
Phase: N/A
Study type: Observational

Combined spinal epidural (CSEA) and single shot spinal anesthesia (SSSA) are both well-established anesthetic methods for caesarean section. CSEA combines the advantages of spinal anesthesia for the surgery, and epidural anesthesia for postoperative pain management. The aim of this randomized trial was to compare analgesia and patient satisfaction with CSEA continuous epidural administration of local anesthetics versus SSSA with oral pain medication in the postoperative period.

NCT ID: NCT02197546 Completed - Pain Clinical Trials

Acupuncture for Pain During Injection of Local Anaesthetic

AcuDent
Start date: July 2010
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Stimulation of acupoint LI4 has been shown to result in analgesic effects in patients experiencing acute pain. We aimed to determine whether LI4 acupuncture could reduce pain and distress in children receiving an injection of a local anaesthetic (LA). Children scheduled for dental treatment using local anesthesia as a standard treatment, received bilateral acupuncture at LI4 using indwelling fixed needles. During the treatment, the parents of the patients stimulated the needles by massage. Two different treatment regimes were compared: a standardized LA injection given 5 minutes after acupuncture, and an LA injection without acupuncture. The order of treatment was randomised, with the two treatments performed on different days. Pain intensity during LA injection, assessed by the patient with the Verbal Rating Scale or Faces Pain Scale (0-10), was used as the primary endpoint. Parent- and dentist-assessed pain intensity and agitation, heart rate, and the patients' satisfaction with the received therapy were also recorded.

NCT ID: NCT02111642 Completed - Clinical trials for Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Effect of a Risk Calculator on Patient Satisfaction With the Decision for Midurethral Sling During Prolapse Surgery

Start date: June 2014
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Pelvic organ prolapse occurs with descent of one or more pelvic structures: the uterus and/or cervix, bowel, bladder, or rectum. Although options for treatment include expectant management, pelvic floor physical therapy, and pessary (intravaginal device) use, surgery is the only option which potentially offers a cure. It is well known that women with pelvic organ prolapse are at risk of developing new stress urinary incontinence symptoms after prolapse surgery. Stress urinary incontinence is defined as involuntary loss of urine with an increase in intra-abdominal pressure, such as sneezing, coughing, or laughing. Previous studies have demonstrated that the addition of a prophylactic anti-incontinence procedure at the time of prolapse surgery reduces this risk. One example of such a procedure is a mesh sling placed underneath the urethra (midurethral sling). Nevertheless, the decision to place a midurethral sling to prevent stress urinary incontinence after prolapse surgery remains controversial. A new risk calculator tool has been developed to provide patients' with their individualized risk of developing de novo stress urinary incontinence after prolapse surgery. The primary objective of this study is to determine whether use of this new personalized online risk calculator tool increases patient satisfaction with the decision whether or not to have a midurethral sling placed at the time of prolapse surgery to prevent development of stress urinary incontinence. The investigators hypothesize that use of this tool will increase patient satisfaction with their decision regarding midurethral sling placement.

NCT ID: NCT02061904 Completed - Satisfaction Clinical Trials

Bone Mineral Density Changes of the Acetabulum After Revision Hip Arthroplasty Using Bone Impaction Grafting

BMD&BIG
Start date: January 2014
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Prospective explorative study for the investigation of short-term and medium-term outcomes regarding bone mineral density changes after revision hip arthroplasty making use of bone impaction grafting. Outcome measurements will include objective and subjective clinical data, complications and adverse events, radiographic data measurements recorded at several postoperative intervals.

NCT ID: NCT01889940 Completed - Satisfaction Clinical Trials

Effectiveness of Psycho-emotional Support in Acute Spinal Cord Injury. ESPELMA Project

ESPELMA
Start date: February 2012
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The purposes of the ESPELMA project are twofold: 1) To increase acute spinal cord injury patients' satisfaction with treatment while hospitalization and 2) To increase mastery among rehabilitation professionals with regard to the clinical management of patients' psychological distress. For these purposes, a tailored training for professionals will be designed and offered. It is hypothesized that building capacity among professionals will serve to better management of patients' distress and a greater ability to commit them to the rehabilitation process. Thus, it is expected to lead to better and faster functional recovery and consequently to higher perceived satisfaction with treatment.

NCT ID: NCT01761474 Completed - Satisfaction Clinical Trials

CO2 Versus O2 Insufflation During ERCP Depending on Sedation Protocols

Start date: December 2012
Phase: N/A
Study type: Observational

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography(ERCP) and related procedures can cause abdominal pain and discomfort. Some clinical trials have indicated, using the visual analogue scale (VAS) score, that CO2 insufflation during ERCP ameliorates the suffering of patients without complications, compared with air insufflation. However, differences in patient suffering between CO2 and air insufflation after ERCP depending on sedation protocols have not been reported. We therefore planned prospective, double-blind, randomized, controlled study with CO2 and air insufflation during ERCP depending on sedation protocol.

NCT ID: NCT01742195 Completed - Satisfaction Clinical Trials

Comparison of Patient Comfort With the Nasal and Oral Insertion of the Endobronchial Ultrasound Bronchoscope

Start date: November 2012
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The aim of this study is to determine if the insertion of the linear endobronchial ultrasound bronchoscope is more comfortable for patients when done through the nose compared to its insertion through the mouth. Our hypothesis is that nasal insertion is more comfortable.

NCT ID: NCT01644058 Completed - Satisfaction Clinical Trials

Immediate Loading Of Dental Implants: A Pilot Clinical Study

Start date: June 2011
Phase: Phase 1
Study type: Interventional

Patients will be satisfied with the immediate loading protocol of two implants joined to a complete mandibular overdenture.

NCT ID: NCT01499836 Completed - Postoperative Pain Clinical Trials

Quality Study of Anesthetic Technique on Breast Cancer Surgery

PQSAT
Start date: January 2012
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

Previous studies have shown that paravertebral block (PVB) has the potential to reduce pain and side effects after breast surgery when used in addition to general anesthesia or sedation.The investigators would like to further discern the impact of GA or PVB on the postoperative QoR, pain and satisfaction.

NCT ID: NCT01479985 Completed - Contraception Clinical Trials

Computerized Contraceptive Decision Aid

CDM RCT
Start date: January 2014
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of this study is to conduct a randomized clinical trial of a web-based contraceptive decision aid compared to routine contraceptive counseling to evaluate the effect of the contraceptive decision aid on the contraceptive method selected by the participant. The investigators primary hypothesis is that women utilizing a computerized Contraceptive Decision Aid (CDA) will be more likely to choose highly effective contraception than women who undergo standard clinical contraceptive counseling.