Improving Quality of Care for Patients With Recurrent Ovarian Cancer

Status Not yet recruiting

Clinical Trial Summary

Ovarian cancer is a major cause of cancer related death among women. The disease is usually advanced at diagnosis, because specialist referral is delayed due to vague nature of presenting symptoms. Primary treatment is successful, but most patients experience recurrence. Complaints due to disease and therapy overlap. Furthermore treatment schedules are similar in response rate and survival rates. Toxicity of therapy as scored by the physician is best documented, but varies depending on type of chemotherapy. Moreover most knowledge is acquired in clinical trials and not in daily practice. Patient reported outcome (PROs) concerning effects on symptoms, velocity of relief and quality of life (QoL) by the different regimens is sparce. Also it is unknown which symptoms are best relieved. Most trials take into account progression or survival as primary endpoint but not often symptom relief, which is especially important for patients with recurrent disease, without no chance of cure anymore. Knowledge on rating of problems and needs of patients with recurrent ovarian cancer (ROC) to support them in the course of their disease is needed to come to an evidence based and patient centered treatment of choice together with the patient. Physicians most frequently use the Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC) scale for grading of side effects of treatment, but discrepancies with patient experiences is high. Routine collection of PROs may therefore improve patient expectations and management. In this project the investigators intend to augment knowledge by PROs of different chemotherapy schedules for recurrent ovarian cancer in order to improve shared decision making with the physician.

Objective: primary objective of this project is to explore the relief of symptoms due to ROC, the speed with which this occurs by different chemotherapy schedules and development of complaints due to the regimen of chemotherapy. Secondary the investigators intend (1) to assess preferential symptom relief by patients, (2) to correlate toxicity and symptoms of disease to tumor assessed response to chemotherapy and (3) to correlate symptom relief by psychosocial context.

Clinical Trial Description

n/a

Study Design

Observational Model: Cohort, Time Perspective: Prospective

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

Clinical Trial Details

NCT number	NCT02809339
Study type	Observational [Patient Registry]
Source	Radboud University
Contact	Mark Rietveld, M.D. Msc.
Phone	+31 24 36 10353
Email	mark.rietveld@radboudumc.nl
Status	Not yet recruiting
Phase	N/A
Start date	July 2016
Completion date	December 2017

View Details

See also
Status	Clinical Trial	Phase
Active, not recruiting	`NCT05559255` - Changes in Pain, Spasticity, and Quality of Life After Use of Counterstrain Treatment in Individuals With SCI	N/A
Completed	`NCT06238557` - Prospective Evaluation of Psychological Consequences and Impact on Long-term Quality of Life
Recruiting	`NCT05563805` - Exploring Virtual Reality Adventure Training Exergaming	N/A
Completed	`NCT05472935` - Asynchronous Mindfulness Based Stress Reduction to Reduce Burnout in Licensed Clinical Social Workers	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT04444544` - Quality of Life and High-Risk Abdominal Cancer Surgery
Completed	`NCT04281953` - Impact on Quality of Life of Long-term Ototoxicity in Cancer Survivors
Recruiting	`NCT05546931` - Mobile Health Program for Rural Hypertension	N/A
Active, not recruiting	`NCT04746664` - Effects of Nutrition Counselling on Old Age People's Nutritional Status and Quality of Life in Bahir Dar City, North West Ethiopia	N/A
Completed	`NCT05387174` - Nursing Intervention in Two Risk Factors of the Metabolic Syndrome and Quality of Life in the Climacteric Period	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT04142827` - The Effect of Long Term Therapy With High Flow Humidification Compared to Usual Care in Patients With Bronchiectasis (BX)	N/A
Active, not recruiting	`NCT05903638` - A Pilot RCT: the Impact of a Virtual MBSR Course on Women With Primary Infertility	N/A
Completed	`NCT05538455` - Investigating ProCare4Life Impact on Quality of Life of Elderly Subjects With Neurodegenerative Diseases	N/A
Completed	`NCT06216015` - Exercise Training and Kidney Transplantation	N/A
Completed	`NCT03813420` - Sleep Quality of Physiotherapy Students Quality of Life and Physical Activity Level	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT05550545` - Infant RSV Infections and Health-related Quality of Life of Families
Completed	`NCT05346588` - THRIVE Feasibility Trial	Phase 3
Recruiting	`NCT05233020` - Robotic Versus Hybrid Assisted Ventral Hernia Repair	N/A
Terminated	`NCT03304184` - The Role of Biodentine in Class V Dental Lesions on Oral Health Related Quality of Life	Phase 3
Completed	`NCT05063305` - Probiotics, Immunity, Stress, and QofL	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT05380856` - Sacral Neuromodulation for Neurogenic Lower Urinary Tract, Bowel and Sexual Dysfunction	N/A

Clinical trials are conducted in a series of steps, called phases - each phase is designed to answer a separate research question.

Phase 1: Researchers test a new drug or treatment in a small group of people for the first time to evaluate its safety, determine a safe dosage range, and identify side effects.
Phase 2: The drug or treatment is given to a larger group of people to see if it is effective and to further evaluate its safety.
Phase 3: The drug or treatment is given to large groups of people to confirm its effectiveness, monitor side effects, compare it to commonly used treatments, and collect information that will allow the drug or treatment to be used safely.
Phase 4: Studies are done after the drug or treatment has been marketed to gather information on the drug's effect in various populations and any side effects associated with long-term use.