View clinical trials related to Prostatic Neoplasms.
Filter by:This is a prospective, open-label Phase 2 study to evaluate copper Cu 64 PSMA I&T injection for PET/CT imaging in patients with recurrent metastatic prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy.
In 2018 the Unity MR-linac was approved for treating patients with online magnetic resonance (MR)-guided radiotherapy. With the MR-linac it is possible to get real-time MR images with high soft tissue contrast, adapt the radiotherapy plan and subsequently irradiate at each treatment fraction. Patients with prostate cancer is one of the patient groups referred for this new treatment and potentially they will benefit with decreased margins around the tumour and increased local tumor control rates. The acute toxicity is important when evaluating treatment tolerability. A prospective longitudinal observation of the acute treatment toxicity to online MR-guided radiotherapy is therefore essential in the evaluation of this new technology. Patient-reported outcomes (PRO) are disease symptoms and treatment toxicity reported directly by patients themselves without clinician interpretation. Several studies have indicated that clinicians tend to underreport the incidence and severity of patient symptoms, thus a systematic use of PROs in clinical trials can provide valuable evidence to the clinicians. As online MR-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) is a new technology there is limited research worldwide on patient-reported symptoms and quality of life. The objective of this study is therefore to prospectively investigate the patient-reported acute toxicity and changes in quality of life during and after online MR-guided radiotherapy.
This study was planned as an experimental design study with pretest-posttest control group in order to determine the effects of education and telephone follow-up given to patients receiving androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for prostate cancer on quality of life and symptom management.The main question[s] it aims to answer are: - Is the quality of life higher in patients receiving androgen deprivation therapy who are trained and followed up over the phone compared to patients who are only given an education booklet? - Is symptom management higher in patients receiving androgen deprivation therapy who received training and followed-up over the phone compared to patients who were only given an education booklet?
This phase 2a study will involve enrolment of men presenting with progression of biopsy proven prostate cancer who require imaging for staging/re-staging of their disease. The participants enrolled will be further sub-stratified into two groups; one group of men with hormone-sensitive disease (cohort A), and a second group of men with castrate-resistant disease being considered for 177Lu-PSMA-617 therapy (Cohort B).
Urinary incontinence post radical prostatectomy is a well-recognized complication regardless of approach, with a potential negative impact on health-related quality of life. Although 12-month continence rates range from 85-95% in the literature, few patients are continent in the early postoperative period. It has been suggested that posterior reconstruction of the Denonvilliers' musculofascial plate, also known as the Rocco stitch, may improve early return to urinary continence, though clinical equipoise remains.
This is a pilot study to assess the safety and measure image-based absorbed dose of 177Lu-P17-087/177Lu-P17-088 in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) who will undergo radioliagnd therapy using 177Lu-P17-087/177Lu-P17-088. All patients underwent whole-body 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT for selection and accepted intravenous injection with single dose 1.1 GBq (30 mCi) of 177Lu-P17-087/177Lu-P17-088 within one week, then monitored at 1.5 hours, 4 hours, 24 hours, 48 hours, 72 hours, 120 hours and 168 hours after 177Lu-P17-087/177Lu-P17-088 administration with serial whole body planar and SPECT/CT imaging.
The aim of this study is to compare clinically significant prostate cancer detection rate by the 4 biopsy methods: TRUS-guided, cognitive, fusion and transperineal template mapping biopsy. It is recommended to combine MRI-guided biopsy with systematic (TRUS-guided or transperineal template mapping biopsy) biopsy for high yield of prostate cancer diagnosis. Nevertheless, it remains unclear which biopsy combination is more precise for prostate cancer detection.
Many treatments for prostate cancer can cause significant fatigue and/or problems with memory and concentration. Many treatments for prostate cancer also result in disturbed sleep. Improving sleep may reduce feelings of fatigue and improve memory and concentration. The purpose of this study is to test a wearable device that provides real-time feedback on sleep patterns, instruction on how to improve sleep, and a score that indicates periods of time when fatigue and issues with memory and concentration may be most troublesome. The study also is designed to test a type of treatment (cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia, CBT-I) that is helpful for people who are experiencing disturbed sleep.
The aim of the study was to evaluate the prevalence, the prognostic and predictive value of gene alterations in unselected patients with prostate cancer. Patients with histologically confirmed prostate cancer, treated at Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group (HeCOG)-affiliated departments, were included. The presence of gene alterations was assessed using the ForeSENTIA® Prostate panel developed by NIPD Genetic.
Prostate cancer is one of the most commonly diagnosed neoplasm in men worldwide. The gold standard of therapy is radical prostatectomy, a wide surgical excision of the neoplasm and can be performed either open, laparoscopic or robotic. The open retropubic approach, still performed today, can be completed under either general anaesthesia or combined (spinal/epidural) anaesthesia without any clear guideline on which one should be preferred. In this study the investigators aim to evaluate general anaesthesia and combined (spinal/ epidural) anaesthesia in patients undergoing open retropubic radical prostatectomy and define whether these may have an impact on the oncological outcome and safety of the procedure.