View clinical trials related to Primary Health Care.
Filter by:The PrimeCog study aims to describe the symptomatology and pathophysiology of stress-induced exhaustion disorder (SED) and major depressive disorder (MDD) compared to healthy controls (HC). The participants will be recruited at primary care centers, and samples of blood, saliva, and hair will be collected. Digital questionnaires covering psychosocial variables and screening instruments for the detection of depression, anxiety, etc., along with a digital cognitive test battery, will be performed at home. Subsequently, an MRI of the brain will be performed, and analysis of biomarkers for stress, inflammation, and neurodegeneration will be conducted. These procedures will be repeated after twelve and twenty-four months. The study will investigate differences in the biomarkers, neuroimaging findings, and cognitive abilities between patients with SED, MDD, and controls over time. Associations between the symptom severity of MDD/SED and psychosocial variables, cognition, MRI, and the biomarkers will also be examined. The aim is to provide new diagnostic tools for differentiation between MDD and SED and guide individualized treatment based on underlying pathophysiology and cognitive function. All necessary competences for conducting this extensive study are represented within the research group. The PrimeCog study is unique in its comprehensive design, addressing knowledge gaps, and directly comparing these diagnoses over time in primary care, where patients are typically treated.
The goal of this study is to increase primary care professional's ability to identify individuals exposed to intimate partner violence (IPV) in primary health care settings. The main questions it aims to answer are 1. To what extent do the following three interventions contribute to identify potential victims of IPV: (1) the use of a standardized questionnaire that screens exposure to IPV, (2) staff using tailored virtual patients for clinical training on IPV and (3) a combination of interventions 1 and 2? 2. Which intervention do primary care professionals experience as most effective in increasing the ability to identify and respond to victims of IPV? Participants will be divided to apply one of the three interventions in their health care setting: 1) a standardized questionnaire to patients, 2) virtual patients tailored to health professionals, and 3) a combination of 1 and 2. Pre-and post-measurement of the health professionals identification of patients exposed to IPV will will be used to explore the effect of the interventions. Focus group interviews with the participating health professionals will be a qualitative complement. The participants will be asked about what intervention they experience as the most effective in increasing the ability to identify victims of IPV.
Lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) are one of the most common reasons for consultation in Primary Care centres. Differentiating between viral and bacterial aetiologies can be challenging, leading to inappropriate antibiotic prescribing. Lung ultrasound (LUS), an imaging test that gained particular relevance since the beginning of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, offers several advantages over the classic chest X-ray in detecting and monitoring LRTIs, especially when pleural involvement exists. This study aims to correlate LUS findings with capillary blood C-Reactive Protein (CRP) values in patients with LRTIs, evaluating LUS as a diagnostic tool and its impact on therapeutic decisions. The descriptive observational study, conducted from January 2024 to December 2026 in Lleida, will include LRTI patients attending Primary Care centres. By validating LUS as a rapid and non-invasive diagnostic tool, unnecessary antibiotic prescriptions can be reduced, promoting LUS as a complementary test in Primary Care consultations. This will facilitate appropriate diagnosis and treatment decisions for patients with LRTIs, enhancing the overall management of respiratory infections.
Introduction: Diabetic foot (DF) is among the most prevalent complications affecting individuals with diabetes. In Salamanca, 25,631 individuals are enrolled in the Diabetes Care Service, with only 3.06% undergoing a foot examination. Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of implementing a standardized foot care protocol for individuals with diabetes, accompanied by a sensitization and training strategy for nursing professionals. Methodology: Quasi-experimental pre- and post-study with a control group conducted in the Health Centers of Salamanca. Population: Patients included in the Diabetes Care Service (306) (12,458 men and 11,348 women). Measurements: In professionals: number of professionals involved and satisfaction level. In diabetic individuals: Sociodemographic, anthropometric, lifestyle, and clinical variables related to disease control will be measured, along with variables related to protocol implementation (percentage of diabetics who have undergone foot examination, Ankle-Brachial Index (ABI), risk stratification and foot monitoring, percentage of individuals with DF, percentage of individuals with healed DF ulcers, and percentage of individuals who have undergone amputation). Improvement in quality of life will be measured using the COOP-WONCA questionnaire. Expected outcomes: It is anticipated that this study will provide evidence regarding the relationship between protocol implementation and an increase in the detection and care of at-risk feet and DF, as well as an improvement in the quality of life of individuals with diabetes.
As part of UCLA Health's commitment to developing an integrated health system built on a foundation of physician-led, team-based primary care, the Department of Medicine (DOM) implemented a performance-based incentive plan called the Primary Care Clinical Excellence (PCCE) Incentive Plan. The UCLA Health DOM Quality team is leading the implementation and evaluation of this incentive plan across the UCLA Health primary care network, with the primary goal to immediately produce improvements in the quality of primary care. In order to rigorously measure the most efficacious ways to frame and communicate information about the quality improvement (QI) program, the DOM Quality team has partnered with the UCLA Anderson School of Management. Understanding the factors that motivate physicians to deliver high quality primary care will provide pivotal insights into the successful implementation of performance based programs nationwide.
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the implementation and effects of CQI cohorts on AA for PHC clinics. The main questions it aims to answer are to assess the effectiveness of CQI cohorts on AA outcomes.
This study is being conducted to investigate a strategy that may improve knowledge and uptake of pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV prevention (PrEP) among cisgender women in primary care.
The novel multi-professional service delivery model "Primary Care Behavioural Health" (PCBH) has been suggested as an effective way to integrate behavioural health services into routine primary care to overcome the growing problems with psychosocial and mental health problems in primary care. In this multicenter mixed-methods pragmatic clinical trial, the implementation of PCBH in routine primary health care in a region in Sweden is investigated.
Overuse is common in frail older people with polypharmacy, especially in frail older users of multidose drug dispensing (MDD) systems. In this study, we will investigate the effect of a clinical medication review (CMR) with integration of deprescribing (toolbox) on the number of ceased and dose lowered medications (persistent after 6 months) compared to usual care in older users of MDD systems with hyperpolypharmacy. We will perform a controlled cluster-randomized trial in 38 community pharmacies. Per pharmacy, 10 older patients (>= 75) with hyperpolyfpharmacy (>10 medicines in use) with a MDD will be included. Pharmacists will receive training to perform the intervention, a 5-step CMR with a deprescribing toolbox (including deprescribing protocols): 1) patient interview; 2) pharmacotherapeutic analysis; 3) pharmacist and GP discuss actions; 4) actions are discussed with patient; 5) (two)weekly follow-up.
SIMAP is a triple-masked randomised trial aimed at assessing whether an automated system of pictograms associated to medical indications results in better comprehension and adherence of said indications. Adult patients with a recent diagnosis of asthma will be randomised to receive a pictographic depiction of their treatments and recommended interventions or standard communication without assistance from their attending physician. Patients will be followed-up for 60 days using the Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACT). The primary endpoint of this study is the degree of asthma control as assessed by the aforementioned questionnaire. Secondary outcomes include the number of hospitalisations, emergency care unit visits and the need to increase bronchodilator therapy as per current Global Initiative for Asthma guidelines. Outcomes will be analysed under the intention-to-treat principle by a statistician unaware of treatment allocation.