Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Summary

Vitamin K is thought to be important for bone health because it activates several proteins involved in bone formation. Poor dietary intake of vitamin K (mainly found in dark green leafy vegetables) is associated with bone loss and fractures. Giving supplements of the main dietary form of vitamin K (called K1) or another common form which our bodies make from K1(called MK4), to improve bone health have given mixed results. This confusion is thought to have arisen because these studies involved people who already had enough vitamin K or did not have osteoporosis. We want to test the hypothesis that treatment with bisphosphonates combined with vitamin K, in vitamin K deplete elderly women with osteoporosis, may offer additional benefit on skeletal metabolism and reduction of fracture risk. We want to test this by measuring vitamin K status in post-menopausal women with osteoporosis who are on the recommended treatment with a bisphosphonate and calcium/vitamin D supplements. Those with low vitamin K will then be recruited to study the effect of supplementation with either K1 or MK4.


Clinical Trial Description

Vitamin K is important for skeletal health. Vitamin K is essential for the carboxylation of several Gla proteins in bone which are implicated in bone formation and mineralization. These include osteocalcin (OC) and matrix Gla protein (MGP). Carboxylation of the glutamic acid residues of these proteins optimises their function. Vitamin K occurs as either phylloquinone (vitamin K1) which is the major dietary form or menaquinones (MKs or vitamin K2) which are mainly of bacterial origin. MK4 of the vitamin K2 series has additional, carboxylation-independent, functions including the regulation of osteoblastic specific markers such as alkaline phosphatase (BALP), and osteoprotegerin (OPG) and has inhibitory effects on osteoclast activity. Several observational studies have shown that low vitamin K status is associated with low bone mineral density (BMD) and increased fracture risk, although proof of causality is lacking. The results of several placebo-controlled clinical trials of vitamin K1 and MK4 have been conflicting with some, but not all, showing a positive effect of vitamin K1 on BMD or bone turnover. Positive fracture efficacy has been demonstrated with high-dose MK4, although most trials were on Japanese women. These intervention studies may have been hampered by the study design such as inclusion of vitamin K replete subjects or healthy non-osteoporotic women. The use of vitamin K in the prevention of bone loss and/or fractures in high-risk post-menopausal women with osteoporosis who are vitamin K deplete merits further investigations. The prevalence of low vitamin K stores is high in elderly subjects with osteoporosis. Preliminary data in Japanese women suggest that combined treatment with a bisphosphonate and vitamin K, at least vitamin K2 (MK4), appears to have an additive beneficial effect on BMD and bone resorption. There have been no such studies in a caucasian osteoporotic population. We want to test the hypothesis that treatment with bisphosphonates combined with vitamin K, in vitamin K deplete elderly women with osteoporosis, may offer additional benefit on skeletal metabolism and reduction of fracture risk.

The first part will be a cross-sectional study of post-menopausal women with osteoporosis aged between 60-80 years who are on treatment with bisphosphonate. Their vitamin K status will be determined and those patients who are found to have low vitamin K concentrations defined as <0.35 ug/ml will be invited to take part in an 18 months prospective randomised placebo controlled trial.

Eligible patients will be randomised to 3 arms (35 patients in each arm). All 3 groups will continue to receive weekly oral bisphosphonate (commonly Alendronate 70 mg weekly) and adjunctive calcium/vitamin D supplements (1.0g of calcium and 800 I.U of cholecalciferol). The control arm (Group A) will receive placebo. Group B will receive 1.0mg daily of vitamin K1 and MK4 placebo. Group C will receive vitamin K2 (MK4) 45 mg daily and vitamin K1 placebo. Patients will be seen at baseline and at 3, 6, 12 and 18 months. Changes in BMD at the lumbar spine, hip, fore-arm at 18 months and the biochemical parameters at each time point will be compared between the groups. ;


Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


NCT number NCT01232647
Study type Interventional
Source Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust
Contact
Status Active, not recruiting
Phase Phase 2/Phase 3
Start date April 2015
Completion date March 31, 2020

See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT01224717 - Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Oral Doses of PTH134 in Post-menopausal Women Phase 1
Completed NCT00551174 - A Study of Bonviva (Ibandronate) in Women With Post-Menopausal Osteoporosis Who Have Received Previous Bonviva Treatment Phase 4
Completed NCT00984893 - Intra-venous Zoledronic Acid Once Yearly N/A
Withdrawn NCT01826656 - Bone Healing in Healthy and Post-menopausal Osteoporotic Women N/A
Completed NCT00718861 - 3 yr Efficacy & Safety Study of Zoledronic Acid in Post-menopausal Women With Osteoporosis Treated With Zol Acid for 6 Yrs Phase 3
Completed NCT00081653 - A Study of Bonviva (Ibandronate) in Women With Post-Menopausal Osteoporosis Previously Treated With Bonviva Phase 4
Completed NCT00503113 - A Study of Bonviva (Ibandronate) and Alendronate on Renal Function in Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis at High Risk for Renal Disease. Phase 4
Completed NCT00150969 - Vitamin K Supplementation in Post-Menopausal Osteopenia Phase 3
Completed NCT03432533 - A Comparison of Subject-administered Romosozumab With Healthcare Provider-administered Romosozumab for Osteoporosis Phase 3
Completed NCT00545779 - BONCURE Study: A Study of Monthly Bonviva (Ibandronate) in Women With Post-Menopausal Osteoporosis on Bisphosphonate Therapy. Phase 4
Completed NCT00533650 - Proof of Concept (Bone Resorption/Bone Mineral Density) Study (0429-005) Phase 2
Completed NCT00666627 - Bisphosphonate Action on the Appendicular Skeleton: Evidence for Differential Effects Phase 2