Parastomal Hernia Clinical Trial
Official title:
Parastomal Hernia Repair Utilizing the Retromuscular Sugarbaker Versus Keyhole Mesh Techniques: A Registry-Based Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT number | NCT03972553 |
Other study ID # | 19-398 |
Secondary ID | |
Status | Completed |
Phase | N/A |
First received | |
Last updated | |
Start date | April 25, 2019 |
Est. completion date | November 27, 2023 |
Verified date | November 2023 |
Source | The Cleveland Clinic |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
This will be a randomized controlled trial comparing the incidence of radiographic hernia recurrence 2 years after parastomal hernia repair utilizing the retro-muscular Sugarbaker technique compared to the retro-muscular keyhole mesh technique. The primary endpoint will be recurrence at two years. Secondary endpoints will be the incidence of mesh-related complications, all 30-day complication rates, and hospital length of stay. Patients eligible for the study will be 18 years or older with a parastomal hernia that requires open repair retromuscular repair without ostomy reversal as determined by one of five hernia surgeons who will participate in this study at the investigators' institution. All patients will be marked for a new stoma site preoperatively. Patients who have insufficient bowel length suitable for either technique will be excluded intraoperatively. Patients enrolled in the study will be entered in the Americas Hernia Society Quality Collaborative database by the attending surgeon. The database houses patient demographics, medical comorbidities, operative details, and postoperative outcomes - all entered by the attending surgeon.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 150 |
Est. completion date | November 27, 2023 |
Est. primary completion date | November 27, 2023 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - The patient is willing and able to give informed consent - Patient has one parastomal hernia - Patient is willing to undergo mesh-based repair - Patient is considered eligible to undergo open retromuscular repair without ostomy reversal - The patient can tolerate general anesthesia - Repair being performed in an elective situation Exclusion Criteria: - The subject is <18 years of age - Patient has more than one stoma - The patient is unable to give informed consent - Patient is not willing to undergo mesh-based repair due to any reason - Patient not eligible for open retromuscular repair without ostomy reversal - Patient is unable to tolerate general anesthesia |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
United States | Cleveland Clinic Center for Abdominal Core Health | Cleveland | Ohio |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Clayton Petro |
United States,
Carne PW, Robertson GM, Frizelle FA. Parastomal hernia. Br J Surg. 2003 Jul;90(7):784-93. doi: 10.1002/bjs.4220. — View Citation
De Raet J, Delvaux G, Haentjens P, Van Nieuwenhove Y. Waist circumference is an independent risk factor for the development of parastomal hernia after permanent colostomy. Dis Colon Rectum. 2008 Dec;51(12):1806-9. doi: 10.1007/s10350-008-9366-5. Epub 2008 May 16. — View Citation
Gavigan T, Stewart T, Matthews B, Reinke C. Patients Undergoing Parastomal Hernia Repair Using the Americas Hernia Society Quality Collaborative: A Prospective Cohort Study. J Am Coll Surg. 2018 Oct;227(4):393-403.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2018.07.658. Epub 2018 Aug 4. — View Citation
Hotouras A, Murphy J, Thaha M, Chan CL. The persistent challenge of parastomal herniation: a review of the literature and future developments. Colorectal Dis. 2013 May;15(5):e202-14. doi: 10.1111/codi.12156. — View Citation
Raigani S, Criss CN, Petro CC, Prabhu AS, Novitsky YW, Rosen MJ. Single-center experience with parastomal hernia repair using retromuscular mesh placement. J Gastrointest Surg. 2014 Sep;18(9):1673-7. doi: 10.1007/s11605-014-2575-4. Epub 2014 Jun 19. — View Citation
Timmermans L, Deerenberg EB, Lamme B, Jeekel J, Lange JF. Parastomal hernia is an independent risk factor for incisional hernia in patients with end colostomy. Surgery. 2014 Jan;155(1):178-83. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2013.06.014. Epub 2013 Nov 12. — View Citation
Turnbull GB. Ostomy statistics: the $64,000 question. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2003 Jun;49(6):22-3. No abstract available. — View Citation
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Radiographic hernia recurrence 2 years after parastomal hernia repair | To compare the incidence of radiographic hernia recurrence 2 years after parastomal hernia repair utilizing a retromuscular Sugarbaker technique compared to the retromuscular keyhole mesh technique. | Two years after the last surgery | |
Secondary | Incidence of mesh-related complications | To compare the incidence of mesh-related complications between the two study groups. | Two years after the last surgery | |
Secondary | 30-day complication rates | To compare all 30-day complication rates for the two study groups. | 30 days after the last surgery | |
Secondary | Hospital length-of-stay | To compare hospital length-of-stay for the two study groups. | An average of 1 week after the last surgery |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Terminated |
NCT05514600 -
Fascial Defect Closure for Minimally Invasive Parastomal Hernia Repair
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04311333 -
Endostomal Three-dimensional Ultrasonography for Parastomal Hernia
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06077318 -
Comparison of the Sugarbaker and Keyhole Repair for Parastomal Hernia
|
||
Completed |
NCT01380860 -
Primary Prevention of Peristomial Hernias Via Parietal Prostheses
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00908661 -
Effectiveness of a Lightweight Mesh in the Laparoscopic Prevention of Parastomal Hernia
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04282473 -
Peristomal Hernia Rate 5 Years After a Terminal Colostomy With the Parietex ™ TCM Parietal Prosthesis Versus Without Mesh
|
||
Completed |
NCT03792243 -
Outcomes After Parastomal Hernia Repair
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT01955278 -
Role of Prosthetic Mesh in Preventing Parastomal Hernias
|
Phase 3 | |
Terminated |
NCT00641342 -
Prevention of Parastomal Hernia by Primary Mesh Insertion
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 | |
Terminated |
NCT04966065 -
Evaluation of the Parietex TM Parastomal No Hole Mesh for Repair of Parastomal Hernias in End-colostomies
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT04440514 -
Endoscopic Preperitoneal Parastomal Hernia Repair (ePauli Repair)
|
||
Not yet recruiting |
NCT04950140 -
Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery and Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery for the Treatment of Parastomal Hernia of the Oncology Patient
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT02489175 -
Stomaplasty Ring (KoringTM) for Prevention of Parastomal Hernia
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03667287 -
Stoma Hernia Intraperitoneal Full-Thickness Skin
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01722565 -
Prospective Study of the Use of a Mesh to Prevent Parastomal Hernia After Laparoscopic Abdominoperineal Resection
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT02368873 -
the Use of a IPOM Mesh for Prevention of Parastomal Hernia
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00917995 -
Trial Concerning the Frequency of Parastomal Hernia With or Without a Mesh
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT02233465 -
Treating Parastomal Hernia With a Mesh
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT01484743 -
Risk Factors for Morbidity After Parastomal Hernia Repair
|
||
Completed |
NCT00509054 -
Prevention of Parastomal Hernia With a Mesh
|
Phase 4 |