Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Completed
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT04860713 |
Other study ID # |
2021-02-03-MMC |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Completed |
Phase |
Phase 4
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
April 22, 2021 |
Est. completion date |
November 17, 2022 |
Study information
Verified date |
November 2022 |
Source |
Maimonides Medical Center |
Contact |
n/a |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Interventional
|
Clinical Trial Summary
Headaches affect over 50% of patients annually, with close to 4% of ED visits for headache.
Most headaches managed in the ED are benign, with 90% of these headaches classified as
tension, migraine, or cluster. At present, the satisfaction with ED treatment of headache is
low, and despite the multitude of available medications, the evidence- based treatment
options are often quite limited. There are over twenty different types of medications
available to the ED clinicians for managing headache, many with different routes of
administration (parenteral, intranasal, subcutaneous, and oral). Many of these medications
are provided in so-called "headache cocktail", which varies based on the physician,
institution, and patient preferences.
Description:
STUDY OBJECTIVES: To compare analgesic efficacy and rates of side effects of a proprietary
formulation of orally administered aspirin and ketamine (AOK) to a Nurtec ODT (Rimegepant)
for pain management in adult ED patients presenting to the ED with acute headache.
HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesize that the administration of AOK will provide similar analgesia at
60 minutes post-administration in comparison to Nurtec (Rimegepant) in adult patients
presenting to the ED with acute headache. The primary outcome of this trial is the difference
in participant's pain scores at 60 minutes post-medication administration.
STUDY DESIGN:
Subjects:
Patients 18 years of age and older presenting to the ED with acute headache (defined as HA
lasting no more than 1 week) and an initial pain score of 5 or more on a standard 11- point
(0 to 10) numeric rating scale and requiring oral analgesia as determined by the treating
attending physician. Patients' screening and enrollment will be performed by study
investigators and research assistants. All patients will be enrolled at various times of the
day when study investigators will be available for patient enrollment and an ED pharmacist
will be available for medication preparation.
Design: This is a prospective, randomized, open-label, equivalence trial comparing analgesic
efficacy and safety of AOK and Nurtec (Rimegepant) in patients presenting to the ED of
Maimonides Medical Center with acute headache. Upon meeting the eligibility criteria,
patients will be randomized into one of the two study arms: Group I will receive AOK, and
Group II will receive Nurtec.
Data Collection Procedures: Each patient will be approached by a study investigator for
acquisition of written informed consent and Health Insurance Portability and Accountability
Act authorization after being evaluated by the treating emergency physician and determined to
meet study eligibility criteria. When English will not be the participant's primary language,
a language- appropriate consent form will be used and non-investigator, hospital employed,
trained interpreters or licensed telephone interpreters will assist in acquisition of
informed consent. Baseline pain score will be determined with an 11-point numeric rating
scale (0 to 10), described to the patient as "no pain" being 0 and "the worst pain
imaginable" being 10. A study investigator will record the patient's body weight and baseline
vital signs. All data will be recorded on data collection sheets, including patients' sex,
demographics, medical history, and vital signs, and entered into SPSS (version 24.0; IBM
Corp) by the research manager. Confirmation of written consent acquisition for all
participants, and statistical analyses will be conducted by the statistician, who will work
independently of any data collection.
Expected Outcomes: The primary outcome will include a comparative reduction of pain scores on
numeric rating pain scale (NRS) at 60 minutes from the baseline. The secondary outcomes will
include a need for rescue analgesia, rates of adverse effects and change in pain score up to
120 minutes. With respect to unique adverse effects of ketamine, we will use Side Effect
Rating Scale for Dissociative Anesthetics (SERSDA) and Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale
(RASS) (ref) SERSDA Scale includes fatigue, dizziness, nausea, headache, feeling of
unreality, changes in hearing, mood change, general discomfort, and hallucinations with
severity of each graded by patients on a five-point scale, with "0" representing the absence
of any adverse effects and "4" representing a severely bothersome side effect. RASS evaluates
the severity of agitation and/or sedation in accordance with the nine-point scale with scores
ranging from "-4" (deeply sedated) to "0" (alert and calm) to "+4" (combative).