Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Withdrawn

Administrative data

NCT number NCT00924963
Other study ID # 2008-0922
Secondary ID
Status Withdrawn
Phase Early Phase 1
First received
Last updated
Start date June 2009
Est. completion date June 2010

Study information

Verified date September 2020
Source Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

To measure and compare pain associated with venipuncture and peripheral intravenous catheter insertion among pediatric emergency department patients randomized to treatment with one of three different pain-reduction strategies: J-Tip® jet injection of 1% buffered lidocaine, J-Tip® jet injection of sterile saline, or application of 4% lidocaine topical cream. The investigators hypothesize that J-Tip® jet injection of 1% buffered lidocaine will provide superior local anesthesia compared to saline or lidocaine cream.


Description:

Background: Venipuncture and PIVC insertion are the most common procedures performed in the pediatric emergency department. They are painful procedures, and frequently no local anesthesia is provided. The American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Pediatric Emergency Medicine and Section on Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine has recommended that local anesthesia be provided, but a variety of barriers exist which have prevented implementation of this recommendation.

Specific Aims: To measure and compare pain associated with venipuncture and peripheral intravenous catheter insertion among pediatric emergency department patients randomized to treatment with one of three different pain-reduction strategies: J-Tip® jet injection of 1% buffered lidocaine, J-Tip® jet injection of sterile saline, or application of 4% lidocaine topical cream.

Methods: This study is a partially blinded, placebo controlled, randomized controlled clinical trial in the pediatric emergency department. The comparison of J-Tip® jet injection of 1% buffered lidocaine to J-Tip® jet injection of sterile saline is double blinded, while the comparison of jet injection to 4% lidocaine topical cream is not blinded. Forty-four patients per group will be enrolled, and a VAS self-reported measurement will be recorded for the pain of venipuncture or PIVC insertion following the appropriate treatment. As well, success of the procedure and complications of treatment will be recorded.

Results: Pain scores will be analyzed by pairwise comparisons using a t-test and pooled comparisons using ANOVA. Demographics will be assessed to determine baseline differences among the three groups. Chi square and regression analysis will be performed on demographic differences to determine significance if necessary. Final pain results will be reported as mean, standard deviation, and p-value. Demographics will be reported as number, percent of patients, and p-value (if a difference exists).


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Withdrawn
Enrollment 0
Est. completion date June 2010
Est. primary completion date June 2010
Accepts healthy volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Gender All
Age group 7 Years to 21 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- Children aged seven to twenty-one years old requiring venipuncture or PIVC insertion as part of their emergency department care are eligible for the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

- Lidocaine allergy,

- TegadermTM allergy,

- Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) less than 15,

- Pain at the proposed site for the procedure,

- Requirement of a PIVC or venipuncture immediately due to illness acuity,

- Inability to complete a self-reported pain scale (VAS, visual analogue scale),

- Patients who do not speak and understand English, OR

- Previous enrollment in the study.

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Device:
J-Tip jet injector
0.2ml 1%buffered lidocaine delivered by jet injector
Jet injection saline
0.2ml saline delivered via J-Tip jet injection
Drug:
lidocaine cream
4% lidocaine cream applied for 30 minutes to the skin

Locations

Country Name City State
United States Cincinnati Children's Hospital Liberty Township Emergency Department Liberty Township Ohio

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Jet injection of 1% buffered lidocaine to 4% lidocaine topical cream to measure the effectiveness of jet injection of lidocaine as a local anesthetic prior to venipuncture and PIVC insertion 1. Pain associated with venipuncture or PIVC insertion after pre-treatment with jet injection of 1% buffered lidocaine versus 4% lidocaine topical cream 30 minutes
Secondary Jet injection of 1% buffered lidocaine to jet injection of saline to assess and measure a potential placebo effect not measured in prior studies Pain associated with venipuncture or PIVC insertion after pre-treatment with jet injection of 1% buffered lidocaine versus jet injection of sterile saline 30 minutes
Secondary Second attempt pain scores (if occurred) among the three groups and between their first and second VAS scores compare pain scores across groups if a second attempt was made using VAS scores 30 minutes
Secondary The success of venipuncture or PIVC insertion with all anesthetic techniques Compare all types of anesthetics during venipuncture or PIVC 30 minutes
Secondary Variety of locations of successful venipuncture or PIVC insertion after jet injection use compare successful venipunctures across locations 30 minutes
Secondary Measurement of complication rate after jet injection use Compare variability of complications that arise post injection across groups 1 hour
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Active, not recruiting NCT05559255 - Changes in Pain, Spasticity, and Quality of Life After Use of Counterstrain Treatment in Individuals With SCI N/A
Completed NCT04748367 - Leveraging on Immersive Virtual Reality to Reduce Pain and Anxiety in Children During Immunization in Primary Care N/A
Terminated NCT04356352 - Lidocaine, Esmolol, or Placebo to Relieve IV Propofol Pain Phase 2/Phase 3
Completed NCT05057988 - Virtual Empowered Relief for Chronic Pain N/A
Completed NCT04466111 - Observational, Post Market Study in Treating Chronic Upper Extremity Limb Pain
Recruiting NCT06206252 - Can Medical Cannabis Affect Opioid Use?
Completed NCT05868122 - A Study to Evaluate a Fixed Combination of Acetaminophen/Naproxen Sodium in Acute Postoperative Pain Following Bunionectomy Phase 3
Active, not recruiting NCT05006976 - A Naturalistic Trial of Nudging Clinicians in the Norwegian Sickness Absence Clinic. The NSAC Nudge Study N/A
Completed NCT03273114 - Cognitive Functional Therapy (CFT) Compared With Core Training Exercise and Manual Therapy (CORE-MT) in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain N/A
Enrolling by invitation NCT06087432 - Is PNF Application Effective on Temporomandibular Dysfunction N/A
Completed NCT05508594 - Efficacy and Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Relationship of Intranasally Administered Sufentanil, Ketamine, and CT001 Phase 2/Phase 3
Recruiting NCT03646955 - Partial Breast Versus no Irradiation for Women With Early Breast Cancer N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT03472300 - Prevalence of Self-disclosed Knee Trouble and Use of Treatments Among Elderly Individuals
Completed NCT03678168 - A Comparison Between Conventional Throat Packs and Pharyngeal Placement of Tampons in Rhinology Surgeries N/A
Completed NCT03931772 - Online Automated Self-Hypnosis Program N/A
Completed NCT03286543 - Electrical Stimulation for the Treatment of Pain Following Total Knee Arthroplasty Using the SPRINT Beta System N/A
Completed NCT02913027 - Can We Improve the Comfort of Pelvic Exams? N/A
Terminated NCT02181387 - Acetaminophen Use in Labor - Does Use of Acetaminophen Reduce Neuraxial Analgesic Drug Requirement During Labor? Phase 4
Recruiting NCT06032559 - Implementation and Effectiveness of Mindfulness Oriented Recovery Enhancement as an Adjunct to Methadone Treatment Phase 3
Active, not recruiting NCT03613155 - Assessment of Anxiety in Patients Treated by SMUR Toulouse and Receiving MEOPA as Part of Their Care